Maastricht University - UM vs ONCAMPUS Global vs Wittenborg University of Applied Sciences vs Maastricht School of Management vs UMIO Maastricht University
Side-by-side comparison from 80 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +International and intercultural environment
- +Problem-Based Learning (PBL) approach
- +Supportive and approachable professors
- +Knowledgeable and supportive faculty
- +Academic and personal growth opportunities
- +Diverse student community and good facilities
- +Practical, industry-focused curriculum with entrepreneurship and FinTech emphasis
- +Supportive, international, and diverse academic environment
- +Engaging and approachable professors and mentors
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- +Comprehensive education and extensive extracurricular opportunities
- +Strong industry connections and career preparation
- +Supportive learning environment and academic rigor
- +Engaging IB program with global cultural exposure
- +Development of skills and adventurous character
- +Rigorous program as a gateway to top universities
- -Excessive workload and pressure associated with problem-based learning.
- -Harsh academic policies and high failing rates leading to negative study advice.
- -Poor organization and support for first-year students.
- -Administrative and management issues are frequently cited.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment are a common complaint.
- -Lack of communication and transparency is a recurring problem.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant drawback.
- -Lack of clear communication and support is a recurring problem.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are significant problems.
- -Communication and transparency are frequently lacking.
- -Overpriced tuition and hidden fees are a significant concern.
- -Poor communication and lack of support from staff and administration are frequently mentioned.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder the learning experience.
This institution receives commendable ratings across several key areas. Its strongest performances are in Internationality (4.39) and Value (4.30), alongside excellent scores for Facilities (4.22) and Professors (4.16). Student Life also scores well at 4.05. The weakest area identified is Accomodation, receiving a significantly lower rating of 2.93. Location, while positive, sits mid-range at 3.86.
A robust profile emerges, with exceptional marks for its professors, location, and student life. The university also scores well in internationality and value. Conversely, facilities and accommodation received slightly lower, though still positive, ratings, representing the areas with the most room for improvement.
A notable strength lies in the university's **Internationality**, achieving a high rating of 4.875. Conversely, **Student Life** received the lowest score at 2.625, suggesting an area for potential improvement. Other areas, including Accommodation, Location, Value, and Professors, fall within a moderate to good range, indicating a generally well-rounded offering with specific areas of excellence and those needing development.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This university garners an excellent overall rating, with particular strengths in its **Location** and **Student Life**, both receiving a perfect score of 5. **Value for money** also stands out at a 5. Areas receiving a solid score of 4 include **Facilities**, **Professors**, **Accommodation**, and **Internationality**. No categories fell below a 4, indicating a consistently strong offering.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strength in several key areas, boasting perfect scores for Facilities and Accomodation, alongside a flawless rating for Internationality. Student Life, Professors, and Location are all highly regarded with scores of 4. The sole area receiving a slightly lower, though still positive, rating is Value at 4, indicating a strong overall offering.
~74% of students recommend Maastricht University, praising its international environment and Problem-Based Learning (PBL). A small minority (~7.8%) express concerns about organization and the PBL method's effectiveness.
With an average rating of 4.74/5 from 19 reviews, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students praise supportive and knowledgeable lecturers, helpful academic support, good facilities, and a diverse community. Minimal negative feedback was noted.
Most feedback is positive (~74%), highlighting practical learning, entrepreneurship focus, and internationalism. There are no negative reviews in the provided data.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
With one review and an average rating of 5/5, this university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback. Students highlight amazing education and ample support, including prestigious extra-curricular masterclass programs.
This university receives a high average rating of 4/5. The single review highlights enjoyment of the IB program, international connections, skill development, and preparation for top universities. There is no negative feedback.
One of the most advertised features of the university, it is very pressuring and does not deliver the promised results - everything still has to be learned in the same manner as everywhere else - but here no tutorials are to be missed and PBL is supposed to be a key to successful graduation. Doing twice the work, therefore dividing the attention and time resources, without other options for students struggling with this method - then you are on your own.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
