EIGSI la Rochelle Engineering School vs Faculty of Economics, University of Tirana - FEUT vs Tehran University of Medical Sciences - TUMS vs Federal Polytechnic Nekede - FPNO vs The Eugeniusz Geppert Academy of Art and Design in Wroclaw - ASP WRO

When examining the university's performance across various categories, location stands out as the strongest area, receiving a high rating. Conversely, accommodation emerges as the weakest point, with the lowest score among the surveyed aspects. Other notable areas include professors and value, which received moderate ratings, while facilities, student life, and internationality scored lower.

This institution demonstrates a strong showing, particularly in its Facilities and Value, both receiving a solid 4. The caliber of Professors also stands out with a high rating of 4.18. On the other hand, Internationality emerged as the area with the lowest score at 3.36. Student Life and Location also received moderate scores, indicating room for improvement.

This university garners a strong score in Student Life, reaching 4.18, and an even higher mark for Value at 4.36, indicating excellent perceived return on investment. Conversely, Accomodation, rated at 3.62, and Internationality, at 3.55, represent the areas with the lowest scores among the surveyed categories. Other aspects like Facilities, Professors, and Location fall within a similar, moderately positive range.

This institution excels in its **Location**, boasting a near-perfect score. **Professors** and **Student Life** also received strong marks, indicating positive academic and social experiences. However, **Internationality** stands out as a notable weakness, alongside **Accomodation** and **Facilities**, which received the lowest ratings. **Value** falls within the average range.

Roughly 32% of reviews are negative. Positive feedback highlights prepared professors and good programs, while negative comments cite poor facilities, outdated materials, and lack of practical application.

All 11 reviews are positive, rating the university an average of 4.18/5. Students highlight excellent facilities, rigorous academics, and strong career support. No negative feedback was recorded.

With an average rating of 4.32/5, ~95% of reviews are positive. Students highly recommend the university for its passionate and knowledgeable lecturers, conducive learning environment, and practical-based courses. No negative feedback was received.

With ~44% positive reviews and no negative feedback, students highlight a supportive community and engaging academic environment. Recurring themes include approachable professors and vibrant campus life, with some noting limited resources or scholarship availability.