Bauman Moscow State Technical University - BMSTU vs University of Waterloo vs The University of Utah vs Federal Polytechnic Nekede - FPNO vs Bogomolets National Medical University - NMU

Side-by-side comparison from 142 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Heliopolis University For Sustainable Development - HU (5.00)
Bauman Moscow State Technical University - BMSTU: wins 0/7 categories
University of Waterloo: wins 1/7 categories
The University of Utah: wins 1/7 categories
Federal Polytechnic Nekede - FPNO: wins 0/7 categories
Bogomolets National Medical University - NMU: wins 0/7 categories
Heliopolis University For Sustainable Development - HU: wins 5/7 categories
Kampala International University of Tanzania - KIUT: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: B.Sc. in Mechanical Engineering
Best programme: Arts and Business
Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
4.40
Read more reviews
8 reviews
×
Best programme: Architecture and Urban Planning
Best programme: Banking and Finance
Best programme: Pharmacy
Category ratings
Facilities
3.67
4.24
4.75
3.90
2.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
Location
3.67
3.88
4.63
3.95
4.33
5.00
Win
Not rated
Professors
4.00
4.14
4.50
3.95
2.33
5.00
Win
Not rated
Internationality
2.00
4.27
Win
4.13
3.55
2.67
3.00
Not rated
Student life
3.67
3.81
4.38
4.18
3.33
5.00
Win
Not rated
Value
3.00
4.17
3.88
4.36
3.67
5.00
Win
Not rated
Accommodation
4.00
3.85
4.38
Win
3.62
2.67
2.00
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Strong foundational knowledge and practical problem-solving skills
  • +Responsive and supportive administration and faculty
  • +University's established reputation and student initiative support
  • +Academic rigor & challenging environment
  • +Bright peers & supportive staff
  • +Experiential learning & co-op opportunities
  • +Supportive professors and excellent teaching methods
  • +Welcoming environment and strong campus life
  • +Valuable resources and diverse academic programs
  • +Passionate, knowledgeable, and helpful lecturers
  • +Conducive learning environment and practical-based courses
  • +Effective teaching methods and dedicated faculty
  • +Expert instructors and engaging teaching methods.
  • +Relevant and practical curriculum with up-to-date content.
  • +Supportive learning environment and strong career services.
  • +Broad range of extracurricular and personal development subjects
  • +Emphasis on student well-being and a positive university experience

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues create significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning experiences.
  • -Lack of communication and transparency from the institution is a recurring problem.
  • -Negative atmosphere and hostile environment
  • -Poor teaching quality and problematic professors
  • -Inadequate mental health and support systems
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequently mentioned.
  • -Lack of resources and insufficient academic support are significant concerns.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor upkeep detract from the learning environment.
  • -Lack of support for student well-being and mental health is a major concern.
  • -Excessive workload and focus on written assignments over practical skills.
  • -Ineffective and demanding remote learning practices.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Inconsistent and unclear communication from instructors and the institution is a recurring problem.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

The university achieves strong ratings in its teaching staff and accommodation, both scoring an excellent 4 out of 5. Other areas like facilities, location, and student life are also well-regarded, averaging around 3.67. However, internationality stands out as a weaker point, receiving a significantly lower score of 2. Value for money is rated a solid 3.

With a diverse range of strengths, this institution excels particularly in **Internationality** and **Facilities**, both receiving scores above 4.2. **Professors** and **Value** also earned high marks. Conversely, **Student Life** and **Location** garnered the lowest scores, though still within a generally positive range. **Accomodation** falls in the middle, rounding out the university's profile.

With excellent scores across most metrics, the university excels particularly in its **facilities**, earning a near-perfect 4.75. **Professors** and **location** also received very strong marks. Conversely, **value** presented the lowest rating at 3.875, suggesting this is the area with the most room for improvement among the surveyed aspects. Student life and accommodation were rated moderately well.

This university garners a strong score in Student Life, reaching 4.18, and an even higher mark for Value at 4.36, indicating excellent perceived return on investment. Conversely, Accomodation, rated at 3.62, and Internationality, at 3.55, represent the areas with the lowest scores among the surveyed categories. Other aspects like Facilities, Professors, and Location fall within a similar, moderately positive range.

This institution demonstrates a strong showing in its location, which received the highest rating. Conversely, its facilities are the weakest point, scoring significantly lower than other aspects. Student life and value also received favorable marks, while professors, accommodation, and internationality fall in the middle range.

This institution excels in key areas, earning top marks for its facilities, professors, location, and student life, all rated a perfect 5. Value for money also scores highly at 5. However, accommodation presents a significant weakness with a rating of 2, and internationality is a moderate area at 3.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4/5 from four reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive. Students highlight strong foundational knowledge and a rewarding academic experience.

With an average rating of 4.23/5 from 104 reviews, ~99% of feedback is positive, highlighting academic excellence, challenging projects, and bright minds. One negative review cited a competitive atmosphere and mediocre teaching quality.

With an average rating of 4.38/5 from 8 reviews, ~88% are positive. Students highlight excellent professors, a welcoming environment, clear teaching methods, and supportive administration. Campus life and location are also praised. No negative reviews were received.

With an average rating of 4.32/5, ~95% of reviews are positive. Students highly recommend the university for its passionate and knowledgeable lecturers, conducive learning environment, and practical-based courses. No negative feedback was received.

With an average rating of 2/5, two out of three reviews are negative (~67%). Students report excessive assignments and a focus on online tasks over practical learning.

With one review, the university received a perfect 5/5 rating. This feedback was entirely positive, highlighting an appreciation for diverse, non-major subject offerings.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
50%
36%
50%
36%
0%
100%
0%
4★
0%
54%
38%
59%
0%
0%
0%
3★
50%
10%
13%
5%
33%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
33%
0%
0%
1★
0%
1%
0%
0%
33%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

GBDA at University of Waterloo

Waterloo is a solid university with great professors and informative classes. It’s location in Waterloo also offers students access to a nice city full of young people also attending UW, or the surrounding schools. The GBDA program also offered a wide variety of classes to teach everything from international business and project management, to digital media capture and user centric design. There are countless careers that can use GBDA as a starting point, which is a real advantage.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Typical Post-Soviet medical university

A certain hierarchy reigns in the university in which professors and the dean’s office are considered gods, and students and laboratory assistants are secondary characters. Despite this, there are people that ready to teach and help you I consider the opportunity to become more independent as a plus in NMU. Many faculties and campuses can also be attributed to the merits of university. The complexity of learning unites students so that you can turn a blind eye to shortcomings…

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close