The Florence Institute of Design International - F.I.D.I. vs Chengdu University of Technology - CDUT vs Kabarak University - KABU vs Kwantlen Polytechnic University - KPU vs Geneva School of Business Administration
Side-by-side comparison from 50 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Transformative personal and professional growth
- +Exposure to captivating art and inspiring environments
- +High-quality, enriching learning experiences
Nothing to show
- +Academic excellence and holistic growth
- +Supportive and dedicated faculty
- +Positive and spiritual learning environment
- +Practical, hands-on learning and real-world applications
- +Supportive and approachable instructors with clear explanations
- +Excellent facilities and opportunities for engagement
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant drawback.
- -Lack of support for students' academic and personal needs is a concern.
Nothing to show
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are major concerns.
- -Lack of adequate administrative support and unclear communication frustrate students.
- -Course quality, including curriculum and teaching methods, often falls short of expectations.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
- -Lack of resources and support are common complaints.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
The institution excels in several key areas, earning top marks for its facilities and student life, alongside a perfect score for internationality. Areas of strength include professors and accommodation, both receiving positive ratings. However, the university's weakest area is its value, indicated by a lower score in that category.
Nothing to show
This university demonstrates exceptional strengths in several areas, notably achieving its highest score for **Value** (4.76). **Professors** also received a very high rating (4.66). Areas like **Facilities** (4.41), **Location** (4.46), and **Accomodation** (4.44) are well-regarded. **Student Life** (4.25) and **Internationality** (4.17) are the comparatively lower, though still positive, scores.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in academic areas, with Professors receiving a high rating of 4.42 and Internationality also scoring well at 4.32. Facilities and Location are similarly well-regarded. Student Life and Accommodations, however, present areas for potential improvement, with ratings of 3.94 and 3.44 respectively. Overall value is rated at a solid 4.0.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 4.5/5 from two reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students highlight significant personal growth, improved skills, and a broadened perspective as key benefits.
Nothing to show
With a high average rating of 4.69/5, ~97% of reviews are positive, highlighting academic excellence, spiritual growth, and a conducive learning environment. Some suggest improvements for specific courses and occasional administrative delays.
Most students find the university's practical, hands-on learning and supportive professors highly beneficial. Excellent facilities and career-focused courses are frequently praised. There is no reported negative feedback.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Learning design in the city of Florence is almost automatic, because the eyes watch captivating art, history and good taste in every corner, everyday. Studying a Master in Interior Design at F.I.D.I. was an experience that deeply enriched my life. In terms of space, the Institute is an excellent example of European Interior Design: well-conserved facade and frescoes of the 1700's on the ceilings and walls mix with new materials and pieces of contemporary furniture, creating a balanced, unique and intimate atmosphere. As I came from a very large university with many campuses in my country, F.I.D.I.'s attention to detail, neatness and personalization felt exquisite. Lessons were given in small groups, teachers are well prepared and actually enjoy what they are doing. From them I learned to observe closely, in order to start designing with quality, always respecting and appreciating the value of places and objects. Possibly the two things I would change are: 1) that teachers plan new projects for their new students to work. Florence has too many highlights and, as I keep in touch with the Institute at social media, I see that they are still making one of the projects that was asigned to my generation 7 years ago, and 2) that it lasted longer. Masters are usually longer to give students a steady formation.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
