Lodz University of Technology - TUL vs Rongo University vs Institute of Technology, University of Kashmir - IOT ZAKURA CAMPUS vs Open Polytechnic vs São Judas Tadeu University
Side-by-side comparison from 31 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Passionate, qualified professors and supportive environment.
- +Abundant extracurricular activities and student groups.
- +Strong academic programs with practical focus.
- +Dedicated and friendly professors/lecturers
- +Student voice through leaders and presentations
- +Growth in facilities and resources
- +Excellent teachers and professors
- +Great university environment and campus
- +Good facilities and activities
- +Extensive course selection and accessible, responsive tutors
- +Flexible study options balancing work and family
- +Supportive and inspirational faculty making learning enjoyable
- +Supportive and welcoming environment for international students
- +High-quality teaching and accessible information
- +Broadening of perspectives beyond career choice
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Outdated facilities and equipment, especially in labs.
- -Lack of professor guidance and student support for tasks.
- -Poor career prospects and limited opportunities after graduation.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
- -Course content is often perceived as irrelevant or poorly delivered.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are common complaints.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is frustrating.
- -Poor teaching quality and irrelevant course material.
- -Disconnect between learning content and assignments/practical skills taught.
- -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of engagement in curriculum and teaching methods is a concern.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This university demonstrates a well-rounded performance according to recent ratings. Its **strongest area is Location**, achieving a score of 4.36, while **Accomodation received the lowest rating** at 3.55. Other categories like Facilities, Professors, Student Life, Internationality, and Value all fall within a respectable 3.8 to 4.1 range, indicating a generally positive experience across multiple aspects of university life.
Academic and social experiences at this institution are highly regarded. Professors and student life received the strongest scores, both at 4.625. Conversely, accommodation and facilities represent the areas with the lowest ratings, averaging around 3.86. The university also scores well in location and value, indicating a positive overall perception across most key aspects.
Among the surveyed aspects, this university excels in **Location**, receiving a high rating. **Student Life** and **Facilities** are rated moderately, alongside **Accomodation**. Performance in **Professors** and **Value** is also positive. The weakest area highlighted by the ratings is **Internationality**.
Regarding university assessments, the value proposition stands out as the strongest area, receiving the highest rating. Conversely, facilities, student life, and accommodation were identified as weaker aspects, all scoring similarly low. Professors and internationality received moderate scores. The university's location also garnered a respectable rating.
With top marks in professorial quality and internationality, this institution excels in these key areas. Students will find excellent facilities and great value for their investment. However, ratings for location, student life, and accommodation are more moderate, suggesting areas where improvements could enhance the overall student experience.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 3.91/5, ~73% of reviews are positive, praising qualified professors and numerous student activities. Some negative feedback (~18%) mentions outdated equipment and a lack of guidance.
Reviews are largely positive (~75%) with a 4.25/5 average rating. Students praise dedicated lecturers and student platforms. A small amount of negative feedback was noted.
With a 3.75/5 average rating, student feedback is ~100% positive. Students praise academics, the great environment, and excellent teacher cooperation. Some mention a lack of practical skill exposure and a need for advanced equipment.
~83% of reviews are positive, praising course variety, helpful tutors, and flexible online learning. A small portion (~17%) of feedback is negative, citing unhelpful course materials and tutors.
Both reviews are highly positive, praising excellent professor support and student integration. University culture is described as a positive and accessible experience.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
What I like about my university and faculty is that I have a lot of possibilities to work on my development. I will meet here a lot of people from different countries and develop my social and soft skills, which are very important, for example in our future job. I cannot say a lot about my faculty yet, because I am here only for a few weeks, but I have very high hopes that it will be a well-spent time!
Rongo University is located on the western region of Kenya. During my time there, my journey as a student was filled with interesting turns. From academic, to socio-cultural to the local political arena, my experiences there molded me to be the person that I am today. I don't regret a single moment.
Nothing to show
I did my BBus through Open Polytech (2007-2013) and was really happy, recommended them. However, in the last couple of years I had to do the Level 5 Certificate in Financial Services (Residential Property) and am now doing the Level 4 Certificate in Accounting, and wow has the standard gone downhill. There were so many errors in the Level 5 Certificate, they had not updated it with very important changes in the laws (of which I rolled out changes in my organisation, so I knew more than the tutor did!). Now I am doing a Level 4 Certificate and the standard of the information is poor, forms that don't work and vaguely worded questions that the 'tutor' refused to clarify. At least I didn't pay for it but the taxpayers (of which I am one) are still paying for it! Such a shame to see my alma mater go backwards like that.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show