Swiss Federal Institute of Technology - ETH Zurich vs University of Loughborough vs National Institute of Technology Rourkela - NITRKL vs Machakos University - MKSU vs TED University
Side-by-side comparison from 142 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +High-quality education and demanding curriculum
- +Excellent digitalization and accessible learning platforms
- +Vibrant campus life and strong student support systems
- +Strong academic programs with real-world relevance and expert faculty
- +Vibrant campus life with diverse and collaborative community
- +Excellent enterprise support and focus on innovation
- +Strong technical skills & practical experience
- +Collaborative environment & learning support
- +Research opportunities & good career outcomes
- +Supportive and approachable faculty
- +Accessible location and affordable fees
- +Good academic programs and learning resources
- +Diverse and English-taught programs with highly qualified professors
- +Engaging extracurricular activities and clubs
- +Well-maintained campus facilities and study spaces
- +Flexible remote learning options
- +Supportive campus resources
- +Work-study balance
- +Supportive teachers and practical education
- +Personal and professional development
- +Nurturing and caring environment
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a common complaint.
- -A perceived lack of student support and engagement is a recurring negative.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and insufficient support are prevalent concerns.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequently mentioned.
- -Lack of engaging teaching methods and insufficient student support are concerns.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support is prevalent.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources negatively impact the learning experience.
- -Poor communication and lack of support are frequently cited complaints.
- -Administrative & management issues.
- -Outdated facilities.
- -Lack of engagement and outdated curriculum.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are consistently criticized.
- -Ineffective teaching methods and a lack of practical application are major complaints.
Assessing this university reveals a generally positive student experience. Value for money is outstanding, scoring highest, closely followed by internationality and facilities. Student life and location also receive strong endorsements. However, accommodation presents the weakest area, with a notably lower rating. Professors' ratings are respectable but fall below the other strong categories.
Overall, the university scores well across multiple categories. Its strongest area is **Facilities**, boasting an impressive 4.69 average. **Student Life** and **Value** also received high marks, both exceeding 4.3. The lowest-rated aspect is **Location** at 4.0, while other areas like Professors, Accomodation, and Internationality remain solid with scores above 4.2.
Offering strong value for money, this institution excels in several key areas. Facilities, professors, accommodation, and internationality all received high marks, indicating a well-resourced and globally-minded environment. Student life presents a good, though not exceptional, experience. The primary area for improvement lies in its location, which received the lowest rating.
This institution receives very strong evaluations for its Professors and Location, both rated at 4.47. Student Life also scores well at 4.26, and Value is highly regarded at 4.42. Areas with slightly lower, though still respectable, ratings include Facilities (3.89), Internationality (3.84), and Accommodations (3.74).
An overview of the university's ratings reveals an exceptional academic environment, with professors receiving a perfect score. Location also scores highly. Student life and accommodation are also considerable strengths, both rated at 4.5. The university performs well in internationality and value, but facilities stand out as the weakest area, with a rating of 3.5.
This institution boasts outstanding strengths, with perfect scores for its facilities, professors, student life, accommodation, and internationality. These areas indicate a highly supportive and engaging environment for students. However, the university receives a significantly lower rating for its location, which may be a point of consideration for prospective students. The value for money is rated well at a 4, suggesting a generally positive return on investment.
This institution garners perfect scores across all evaluated aspects. Its facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value are all rated a flawless 5 out of 5. This indicates a consistently strong and highly desirable university experience, with no single area standing out as a particular weakness or strength relative to others.
With an average rating of 4.3/5 from 43 reviews, nearly all ~93% are positive. Students highlight an impressive academic environment, high teaching quality, and good digitalization. Some mention demanding workloads and variable organization.
With a ~95% positive sentiment, reviews highlight diverse courses, work experience opportunities, and a vibrant campus. Students appreciate the supportive, collaborative atmosphere and lack of a strong drinking culture. No negative feedback was recorded.
With one review and an average rating of 5/5, the university receives ~100% positive feedback. Students highlight strong engineering programs, practical experience, diverse environments, research opportunities, and good placement records.
Machakos University garners overwhelmingly positive reviews, with ~95% of feedback being highly favorable. Students praise its balanced academic and campus life, approachable lecturers, and accessible location, with ~5% noting areas for course streamlining.
With 100% positive feedback and an average rating of 5/5, students highlight a diverse learning environment, knowledgeable professors, and ample extracurricular activities. Well-maintained facilities and a fully English-taught curriculum are also appreciated.
This university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with a 5/5 average rating. The single review highlights excellent remote learning options and ample campus resources. No negative feedback was provided.
The sole review is highly positive, with a 5/5 rating, praising the quality of education and practical work. The reviewer highlighted effective teaching and personal development support.
Pro: Very good education. Con: Very high workload. We get tought more details and theory behind the concepts we learn than at other universities. However, this also shows in a higher workload. Nevertheless, it is very interesting. For student life, there are lots of great student associations, there is really something for everyone and plenty of events to attend or associations to join.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
The University is located near a town making it reacheable easily. Smart planning of the lecture halls;no need for long walks from place to place The university administration is now keen on supporting cocurricular activities where students are benefitting largely.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show