Dublin Institute of Technology - DIT vs Dublin City University - DCU vs ONCAMPUS Global vs EM Normandie - EM Normandie vs American College Dublin - ACD
Side-by-side comparison from 121 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practical, applied learning with real-world focus.
- +Accessible faculty and strong student support.
- +Central location and active academic atmosphere.
- +Dedicated and supportive lecturers
- +Welcoming and friendly student community
- +Positive and smooth overall university experience
- +Supportive and approachable lecturers
- +Well-organized courses and learning resources
- +Personal and academic development
- +Connecting theory to practice through real-world cases.
- +Diverse international environment and global opportunities.
- +Relevant industry-focused courses and knowledgeable faculty.
- +Passionate and supportive faculty with personalized attention
- +Strong focus on student success and career development
- +Welcoming city environment and convenient accommodations
Nothing to show
- +Skill development and career preparation
- +High-quality facilities and specialized programs
- +Supportive community and accessible staff
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities are a significant issue.
- -Administrative and management inefficiencies cause frequent frustration.
- -Lack of clear communication and support creates confusion and dissatisfaction.
- -Administrative and management issues cause constant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are major drawbacks.
- -Ineffective teaching methods and insufficient support hinder learning.
- -Administrative and management issues are frequently cited as a source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are a common complaint.
- -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant or poorly delivered.
- -Perceived as a money-making scheme with mediocre teaching.
- -Administrative and financial mismanagement, including delayed refunds and staff turnover.
- -Concerns about academic stability and frequent changes in teaching staff.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance detract from the learning environment.
- -Lack of effective communication and support from staff is a recurring complaint.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in student life and location, receiving the highest marks in these areas. Conversely, accommodation presents the lowest score. Professors and internationality are also positively rated, alongside a solid showing for value and facilities. Overall, the university offers a generally favorable experience, though areas for improvement, particularly in housing, are evident.
This university garners favorable ratings across most aspects, with **Professors** and **Value** standing out as the strongest areas, both scoring above 4.3. **Facilities** and **Student Life** also receive high marks, exceeding 4.2. **Accomodation** and **Internationality** are well-regarded, with scores around 4.0 and 4.1 respectively. The **Location** is the weakest performing category, though still respectable at 3.75.
Overall, this institution garners favorable reviews across multiple aspects. The highest-rated areas are Professors (4.75) and Location (4.73), indicating significant strengths in these domains. Conversely, Facilities (4.3) and Accomodation (4.27) received the lowest scores, suggesting these might be areas for potential improvement. Student Life and Internationality also scored highly.
This institution performs well across most aspects, with **Internationality** standing out as its strongest area. Facilities, Professors, and Value also receive high marks. Areas for potential improvement include **Location**, which scored the lowest, and Accomodation. Student life and the overall value proposition are rated solidly in the mid-to-high range.
This institution's strengths lie in its **Professors**, with a solid rating of 3.86, and its **Internationality** and **Value**, both scoring 3.71. Conversely, areas requiring improvement include **Facilities** and **Student Life**, each receiving a 2.87 rating. **Location** and **Accommodation** fall in the mid-range, with scores of 3.2 and 2.93 respectively.
Nothing to show
A solid academic profile emerges from these university ratings. Facilities and Professors are particularly strong points, both scoring above 4.0. Student Life, Location, and Internationality are also well-regarded, all receiving a respectable 3.9. The weakest area appears to be Accomodation, with a score of 3.4, while Value also performs well at 4.1.
With ~76% positive reviews and an average of 4.06/5, students highlight practical learning, helpful faculty, and strong community. No negative feedback was reported.
With a 4.49 average rating from 61 reviews, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight excellent lecturers, a welcoming community, and a positive academic experience.
Reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%), highlighting excellent teaching, supportive staff, and well-organized courses that improve language and academic skills. Minor scheduling changes were the only noted inconvenience.
Most reviews (approximately 71%) highlight a positive learning atmosphere, inspiring professors, and valuable international experiences. A small amount of feedback (around 14%) suggests mediocrity and a focus on profit. The average rating is 3.86/5.
Most (approximately 86%) of the 14 reviews are highly positive, praising knowledgeable and supportive faculty, small class sizes, and career development. A small percentage (~7%) of feedback mentioned financial issues and staff retention.
Nothing to show
Most reviews are positive, with students praising rewarding experiences, excellent facilities, and helpful staff. Approximately 90% of feedback is positive, with no negative reviews documented.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
