Vilnius University vs Vilnius Tech vs Vilnius University of Applied Sciences - VIKO vs Mykolas Romeris University - MRU vs SMK College of Applied Sciences - SMK
Side-by-side comparison from 270 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Excellent learning system and accessible study materials
- +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty and coordinators
- +Strong academic programs with practical training opportunities
- +Practical, future-oriented programs and strong academic curriculum
- +Inspiring, collaborative environment and creative innovation focus
- +Supportive professors, clear explanations, and useful, relevant subjects
- +Practical, applied learning focused on real-world skills
- +Supportive and knowledgeable teaching staff
- +Opportunities for success and career preparation
- +Welcoming international environment and diverse student body
- +Knowledgeable and supportive professors
- +Practical, skill-focused learning opportunities
- +Practical, career-oriented education with real-world skills
- +Supportive, approachable lecturers with professional experience
- +Friendly learning environment with personal and professional growth opportunities
Nothing to show
- +Excellent professors and quality teaching in accessible languages
- +Diverse and interdisciplinary academic programs
- +Vibrant campus life and good value for money
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources detract from the learning experience.
- -Lack of support and guidance from faculty is a recurring concern.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
- -Lack of support and resources impacts student experience.
- -Administrative and management issues are frequently cited.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a common complaint.
- -The curriculum and teaching methods are often perceived as ineffective or irrelevant.
- -Lack of adequate support and guidance from professors
- -Unrealistic and overwhelming initial course expectations
- -Poor quality of facilities, particularly dormitories
- -Outdated facilities and a small, unappealing campus environment.
- -Limited course offerings in English and a perceived lack of appeal for students.
- -Struggles with administrative and management issues.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a consistent problem.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring concern.
This institution receives exceptional ratings in several key areas, particularly excelling in **Value** (4.60) and **Professors** (4.58). Student life, location, and internationality also score highly. However, **Accommodation** stands out as the weakest area, receiving a significantly lower rating. Overall, the university demonstrates a strong academic and social environment, with room for improvement in its housing provisions.
This institution demonstrates commendable strengths, particularly in its **Location**, receiving the highest rating. **Student Life** also scores very favorably. While all aspects are well-regarded, **Accomodation** received the lowest score among the assessed areas, indicating room for improvement in that specific category. Overall, the university presents a solid offering with distinct highlights.
This institution demonstrates strong performance in several key areas, with Student Life and Location receiving particularly high marks. Facilities and Internationality also rank very favorably. While Accomodation is rated lower than other categories, it remains a solid score, indicating an overall positive university experience. Professors' ratings, while good, are the lowest among the surveyed aspects.
This institution excels in student life and internationality, both scoring a high 4.45. Location also received a strong rating of 4.42. Accommodation is the lowest-rated area at 4.07, though other aspects like facilities, professors, and value remain solidly above 4.0.
This institution garners excellent marks for its location, student life, internationality, and facilities, all receiving scores above 4.3. Professors are also highly rated at 4.2. A notable area for improvement is accommodation, which received the lowest rating at 3.18. The overall value proposition is solid, rated at 4.03.
Nothing to show
Exceptional scores highlight the university's strengths. Facilities receive a perfect 5, with professors, location, and student life also earning high marks at 4.75. Internationality and value are well-regarded at 4.25. Accommodation stands out as the comparatively weaker area, scoring a 4. While generally strong, this indicates room for improvement in student housing options.
The university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~93% of students rating it 4–5 stars. Praised aspects include learning systems, humble and helpful teachers, and an international environment. Minimal negative feedback exists.
University reviews are highly positive, with ~100% giving 4-5 stars and an average rating of 4.33/5. Students praise well-structured, future-oriented programs, practical applications, and excellent academic facilities.
With an average rating of 4.47/5 from 15 reviews, ~93% are positive. Students highlight the practical curriculum, supportive faculty, and opportunities for success. No negative reviews were provided.
With a 4.39 average rating from 28 reviews, ~96% are positive, highlighting a welcoming international environment, supportive professors, and practical learning. A small ~4% of feedback mentioned some programs needing improvement for challenging, research-focused study.
With an average rating of 4.37/5, ~97% of reviews are positive. Students praise practical, career-oriented programs, supportive lecturers, and a modern learning environment. A single negative review exists.
Nothing to show
Four out of four reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.5/5. Students highlight a high-quality, diverse academic experience with professional, engaging professors. The university is recommended for its academic freedom, critical thinking emphasis, and value.
This is one of the best universities in Lithuania right now. After taking admission here, I joined the classes and the learning system impressed me greatly. We have online learning moodle , where we can find everything that is taught in the class also we get all updates and study materials here. We can submit our lab works and assignments here that can helps us to track all the things. Apart from this, we have got humble teachers who are very cooperative and helpful to us. As a non EU student, I feel these things are adorable to me.
VGTU is one of the best technical universities in Lithuania. They provide many field of studies for students and good environemnet for studies at all. Moreover, its International office provides many opportunities to study or doing internship abroad, thus have cooperation with many international universities around the world. Thanks to VGTU, I got a summer internship 2019 in Belgium and received good feedback there and, at the moment, I am studying in Estonia by bilateral agreement. I especially want to note teachers staff of the department where I study. They are good specialists and share necessary experience during lectures which can be useful for the future job. Furthermore, sometimes they send us actual vacancies and give recommendations to some companies who are ready to consider students' applications. For me personally this university "opened a window of life". I have met a lot of people from other countries, learned new things and got valuable life experience.
Nothing to show
Mykolas Romeris University is unlike anything I've ever seen; the quality of education here is insanely high, but it's more than just academics; it's about preparing you for practical problems! Our lecturers don't just teach us from textbooks; they use their personal experiences and industry connections to paint a vivid picture of what awaits us outside the confines of a notebook or classroom. When we graduate, we are more than just theoretical specialists; we are problem solvers who are ready to leap headfirst.
I am currently studying in the Tourism and Recreation programme and have completed four semesters. Overall, my experience at SMK College of Applied Sciences has been positive. The programme combines theoretical knowledge with practical activities, helping students understand how the tourism and recreation industry works in real-life situations. The lecturers are generally supportive and willing to help students when needed. Classes cover a variety of topics related to tourism, hospitality, recreation, and business, which provides a broad understanding of the field. I also appreciate the opportunity to work on projects and assignments that encourage teamwork and problem-solving skills. The college has an international environment, allowing students to meet people from different countries and cultures. This makes studying more interesting and helps improve communication skills. One area that could be improved is the organization of some administrative processes, which can occasionally take longer than expected. However, this has not significantly affected my studies. I would recommend SMK College of Applied Sciences to students who are interested in tourism and recreation and are looking for a practical, career-oriented study programme.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
