University of Ghana - UG vs Tamale Technical University - TATU vs University for Development Studies - UDS vs Tamale College of Education - TACE vs University of Cordilleras

Side-by-side comparison from 252 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: AP University of Applied Sciences and Arts - AP (5.00)
University of Ghana - UG: wins 1/7 categories
Tamale Technical University - TATU: wins 1/7 categories
University for Development Studies - UDS: wins 0/7 categories
Tamale College of Education - TACE: wins 0/7 categories
University of Cordilleras: wins 0/7 categories
AP University of Applied Sciences and Arts - AP: wins 5/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Administration
Best programme: Bsc Information Technology
Best programme: Education
Baguio City, Philippines
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Marketing and Communications
Category ratings
Facilities
4.00
3.00
Not rated
2.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
Location
4.46
4.00
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
Professors
4.25
4.50
Win
Not rated
1.00
Not rated
4.00
Internationality
4.09
4.00
Not rated
1.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
Student life
4.30
3.00
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
Value
4.22
4.50
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
Accommodation
3.49
Win
3.00
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
2.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Strong academic programs and theory-practice balance
  • +Diverse, inclusive, and intellectually engaging campus environment
  • +Opportunities for exploration and personal growth
  • +Skill acquisition for career and future
  • +Project support from lecturers
  • +Desire for degree-level programs

Nothing to show

  • +Conducive and bright environment.
  • +Proper movement layout.

Nothing to show

  • +Practical, applicable learning
  • +Supportive and understanding lecturers
  • +Welcoming, stress-free environment
Cons
  • -Outdated curriculum and teaching methods hinder skill development.
  • -Inefficient administrative processes cause communication and access issues.
  • -Overcrowded facilities and old-fashioned learning environments are problematic.
  • -Administrative & management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Limited career support and unclear future prospects are disappointing.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and inadequate resources impact the learning environment.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff causes dissatisfaction.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of communication and support from staff is a common complaint.
Rating summary
What students say

Overall, the university receives positive feedback, with particularly strong ratings in Location (4.32), Student Life (4.29), and Value (4.22). Professors (4.25) and Internationality (4.08) also score well. The weakest area identified is Accomodation, receiving a rating of 3.48, indicating room for improvement in this aspect of the student experience. Facilities also received a solid, but lower, score of 4.

Academic excellence and international appeal are clear strengths, evidenced by high ratings for professors (4.5) and internationality (4). The university also scores well in location (4) and value (4.5). However, areas such as facilities, student life, and accommodation received more moderate scores of 3, suggesting potential for improvement in these aspects.

Nothing to show

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **location** and **student life**, both receiving a high rating of 4. Furthermore, its **value** is also rated positively at 4. Conversely, the university faces challenges in **professors** and **internationality**, both scoring a low 1. **Facilities** and **accommodation** fall within the mid-range with scores of 2 and 3 respectively.

Nothing to show

This institution garners outstanding scores in several key areas, including facilities, location, student life, internationality, and value, all receiving a perfect 5. Professors are also highly rated at 4. However, accommodation presents a clear area for improvement, with a significantly lower rating of 2. This suggests an excellent overall experience, with the exception of housing options.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Most reviews (~88%) highlight academic excellence, diverse programs, and vibrant campus life. A small minority (~1.6%) experienced administrative delays and outdated teaching methods.

With an average rating of 4.5/5, the 2 reviews were entirely positive. Students highlighted lectures' assistance with projects and skill acquisition for future careers.

Nothing to show

The sole review praises the college's conducive environment and proper layout. With an average rating of 4/5, feedback is overwhelmingly positive.

Nothing to show

The sole review is overwhelmingly positive (100%), rating the university 5/5. Students highlight comfort for international learners, practical programs, engaging activities, and supportive lecturers as key strengths.

Rating distribution
5★
41%
50%
0%
0%
0%
100%
4★
47%
50%
0%
100%
0%
0%
3★
10%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
A Grounded and Expansive Learning Experience

Studying Geography at the University of Ghana gave me a strong balance between academic theory and real world perspective. The program encouraged critical thinking about environmental systems, urban development, and human interactions with space, which helped me develop a more analytical way of understanding everyday challenges. Beyond the classroom, the environment was diverse and intellectually engaging, with opportunities to collaborate, research, and explore different viewpoints. Overall, my experience at the University of Ghana was both grounding and expansive, shaping how I approach problem solving and structured thinking today.

75%

It's not a university but it's a training ground to acquire skills for a purpose and future. What I like about this is Lectures are always ready to assist students to undertake projects which enhance their ability. What I dislike about the school is students are being stressed with series of projects with limited time.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close