Universidad de Burgos vs University of Ghana - UG vs Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology - KNUST vs Sunyani Technical University - STU vs University of Energy and Natural Resources - uenr
Side-by-side comparison from 500 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Supportive teachers and academic programs
- +Accessible and helpful staff
- +Positive campus environment and resources
- +Strong academic programs and theory-practice balance
- +Diverse, inclusive, and intellectually engaging campus environment
- +Opportunities for exploration and personal growth
- +Engaging, practical courses and knowledgeable, supportive professors
- +Demanding academics fostering critical thinking, discipline, and problem-solving
- +Excellent facilities, infrastructure, and organized campus operations
- +Dedicated and knowledgeable lecturers
- +Supportive campus environment and good facilities
- +Effective and accessible online management system
- +Supportive, approachable, and knowledgeable lecturers.
- +Strong academic foundation and personal growth opportunities.
- +Well-structured programs with practical project engagement.
- +Good lecturers, staff, and facilities
- +Beautiful location and natural environment
- +Professional and diverse faculties
Nothing to show
- -Poor communication and a lack of transparency from administration.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources.
- -Overcrowded classes and a lack of personalized attention.
- -Outdated curriculum and teaching methods hinder skill development.
- -Inefficient administrative processes cause communication and access issues.
- -Overcrowded facilities and old-fashioned learning environments are problematic.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant drawback.
- -Limited access to necessary resources and support hinders learning.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Facilities are consistently described as outdated and in poor condition.
- -Communication from the institution is frequently unclear and unhelpful.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and unclear expectations lead to confusion.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and inadequate resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of effective teaching and poor communication are major concerns.
Nothing to show
Overall, the university garners a generally positive reception. Professors receive the highest marks, indicating a strong academic environment. Conversely, accommodation is rated lowest, suggesting this area could benefit from improvement. Other aspects like facilities, student life, location, internationality, and value fall within a moderate range, reflecting a generally satisfactory, yet not exceptional, experience across these facets.
Overall, the university receives positive feedback, with particularly strong ratings in Location (4.32), Student Life (4.29), and Value (4.22). Professors (4.25) and Internationality (4.08) also score well. The weakest area identified is Accomodation, receiving a rating of 3.48, indicating room for improvement in this aspect of the student experience. Facilities also received a solid, but lower, score of 4.
Academic and campus life at this institution are generally well-regarded, with particularly strong scores for Location (4.45) and Value (4.43). Student Life (4.34) and Professors (4.33) also received high marks. The weakest area appears to be Accomodation, with a rating of 3.81, indicating room for improvement in this aspect of the student experience.
This university garners strong marks in several key areas, notably excelling in its **location** with a near-perfect score. **Professors**, **student life**, and **value** also receive high praise. However, **accommodation** stands out as the weakest area, indicating potential room for improvement in student housing. **Facilities** and **internationality** receive solid, positive ratings, contributing to an overall favorable assessment.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **professors (4.35)** and **value (4.25)**, as well as a well-regarded **student life (4)**. The **location (3.94)** also receives positive feedback. However, **facilities (3.05)** represent the weakest area according to these ratings, with **accommodation (3.4)** and **internationality (3.4)** falling in the mid-range.
This institution garners strong marks across multiple aspects, with facilities, professors, location, and value all receiving an impressive 4.4. Student life and accommodation also rate well at 4.2. The university's internationality stands as its relatively weakest area, scoring 4.0, though still indicating a positive level of global engagement. Overall, the feedback suggests a well-rounded and highly-regarded educational environment.
Nothing to show
With a 3.96 average rating from 24 reviews, approximately 100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight comprehensive programs, caring teachers, and a supportive learning environment.
Most reviews (~88%) highlight academic excellence, diverse programs, and vibrant campus life. A small minority (~1.6%) experienced administrative delays and outdated teaching methods.
With an average rating of 4.41/5 from 196 reviews, ~87% highlight rewarding experiences, engaging practical courses, supportive professors, and vibrant campus life. A single negative review, representing ~0.5%, was noted.
With an average rating of 4.38/5, ~88% of reviews are positive. Students highlight good facilities, engaging academics, and dedicated lecturers. A recurring challenge is the lack of student accommodation.
With a high average rating of 4.35/5 from 20 reviews, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students frequently praise friendly atmospheres, approachable and knowledgeable lecturers, and a strong foundation for academic and personal growth. No negative feedback was received.
With an average rating of 4.6/5 from 5 reviews, ~80% are highly positive. Students praise the university's beautiful location, good facilities, and professional lecturers. No negative feedback was recorded.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
The University of Ghana is a highly respected institution with strong research, diverse programs, and a vibrant campus life, though it faces challenges with large class sizes and administrative delays, and I would recommend it for its academic reputation and opportunities.
In 2023, my University, KNUST, won the overall best in the world in education. I like the fact that my University gives me the best. Anyone looking for the University now should check through KNUST. There are a lot of opportunities KNUST has for you. Our campuses always look stunning. There are parts where you get to meet Managing Directors of businesses sharing live journeys with us, and I love that.
I like the school because of their Technology level. They have a very responsive advanced management system which make students access all their education needs online and with ease. They teach very well to the understanding of the students. It deserves to be an international school. Is really a good school. But the only thing not actually interesting about it is their school fees are high.
My experience at this university has been highly rewarding. The programme is well-structured, with dedicated lecturers who provide strong academic and professional guidance. I particularly appreciated the supportive learning environment, access to resources, and opportunities to engage in practical projects that enhanced my knowledge. The university also promotes diversity and collaboration, which made the learning experience more enriching. While there could be improvements in administrative processes, overall, I would strongly recommend this university to anyone seeking quality education and personal growth.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show