University of Ghana - UG vs Sunyani Technical University - STU vs University of Energy and Natural Resources - uenr vs Sahyadri College Of Engineering and Management - SCEM vs National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University - NYCU

Side-by-side comparison from 277 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University - NYCU (5.00)
University of Ghana - UG: wins 3/6 categories
Sunyani Technical University - STU: wins 1/6 categories
University of Energy and Natural Resources - uenr: wins 0/6 categories
Sahyadri College Of Engineering and Management - SCEM: wins 0/6 categories
National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University - NYCU: wins 2/6 categories
Catholic University of Ghana - CUG: wins 0/6 categories
Karnataka State Women's University - KSWU: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Administration
Best programme: Hospitality Management
Best programme: Agribusiness Management
Best programme: Electrical Engineering
Category ratings
Facilities
4.00
Win
4.00
3.05
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Location
4.46
4.63
Win
3.94
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
4.25
4.25
4.35
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
4.09
Win
4.00
3.40
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
4.30
Win
4.25
4.00
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Value
4.22
4.25
4.25
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
3.49
3.13
3.40
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Strong academic programs and theory-practice balance
  • +Diverse, inclusive, and intellectually engaging campus environment
  • +Opportunities for exploration and personal growth
  • +Dedicated and knowledgeable lecturers
  • +Supportive campus environment and good facilities
  • +Effective and accessible online management system
  • +Supportive, approachable, and knowledgeable lecturers.
  • +Strong academic foundation and personal growth opportunities.
  • +Well-structured programs with practical project engagement.

Nothing to show

  • +Scenic and well-equipped campus facilities
  • +Highly regarded specific schools and programmes

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Outdated curriculum and teaching methods hinder skill development.
  • -Inefficient administrative processes cause communication and access issues.
  • -Overcrowded facilities and old-fashioned learning environments are problematic.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Facilities are consistently described as outdated and in poor condition.
  • -Communication from the institution is frequently unclear and unhelpful.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and unclear expectations lead to confusion.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause confusion and frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support leads to student dissatisfaction.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Overall, the university receives positive feedback, with particularly strong ratings in Location (4.32), Student Life (4.29), and Value (4.22). Professors (4.25) and Internationality (4.08) also score well. The weakest area identified is Accomodation, receiving a rating of 3.48, indicating room for improvement in this aspect of the student experience. Facilities also received a solid, but lower, score of 4.

This university garners strong marks in several key areas, notably excelling in its **location** with a near-perfect score. **Professors**, **student life**, and **value** also receive high praise. However, **accommodation** stands out as the weakest area, indicating potential room for improvement in student housing. **Facilities** and **internationality** receive solid, positive ratings, contributing to an overall favorable assessment.

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **professors (4.35)** and **value (4.25)**, as well as a well-regarded **student life (4)**. The **location (3.94)** also receives positive feedback. However, **facilities (3.05)** represent the weakest area according to these ratings, with **accommodation (3.4)** and **internationality (3.4)** falling in the mid-range.

Nothing to show

This institution garners significant praise in several key areas. Its accommodation and professor quality stand out with perfect scores. Facilities and student life are also rated highly. However, its location receives a more moderate assessment, suggesting it might be an area for potential improvement or consideration by prospective students. The university also demonstrates good internationality and provides solid value for its students.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

Most reviews (~88%) highlight academic excellence, diverse programs, and vibrant campus life. A small minority (~1.6%) experienced administrative delays and outdated teaching methods.

With an average rating of 4.38/5, ~88% of reviews are positive. Students highlight good facilities, engaging academics, and dedicated lecturers. A recurring challenge is the lack of student accommodation.

With a high average rating of 4.35/5 from 20 reviews, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students frequently praise friendly atmospheres, approachable and knowledgeable lecturers, and a strong foundation for academic and personal growth. No negative feedback was received.

Nothing to show

With a perfect 5/5 average rating, this university has overwhelmingly positive reviews. Students praise its scenic, spacious main campus and renowned Schools of Electronics and Information, and Medicine. There is no negative feedback.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
41%
50%
55%
0%
100%
0%
0%
4★
47%
38%
25%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3★
10%
13%
20%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
A Grounded and Expansive Learning Experience

Studying Geography at the University of Ghana gave me a strong balance between academic theory and real world perspective. The program encouraged critical thinking about environmental systems, urban development, and human interactions with space, which helped me develop a more analytical way of understanding everyday challenges. Beyond the classroom, the environment was diverse and intellectually engaging, with opportunities to collaborate, research, and explore different viewpoints. Overall, my experience at the University of Ghana was both grounding and expansive, shaping how I approach problem solving and structured thinking today.

A very practical and productive knowledge

I like the school because of their Technology level. They have a very responsive advanced management system which make students access all their education needs online and with ease. They teach very well to the understanding of the students. It deserves to be an international school. Is really a good school. But the only thing not actually interesting about it is their school fees are high.

Excellent Academic Support and Opportunities

My experience at this university has been highly rewarding. The programme is well-structured, with dedicated lecturers who provide strong academic and professional guidance. I particularly appreciated the supportive learning environment, access to resources, and opportunities to engage in practical projects that enhanced my knowledge. The university also promotes diversity and collaboration, which made the learning experience more enriching. While there could be improvements in administrative processes, overall, I would strongly recommend this university to anyone seeking quality education and personal growth.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close