Harokopio University - HUA vs Maseno University vs The Kisumu National Polytechnic - TKNP vs Great Lakes University of Kisumu - GLUK vs Maasai Mara University

Side-by-side comparison from 122 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Harokopio University - HUA: wins 0/5 categories
Maseno University: wins 4/5 categories
The Kisumu National Polytechnic - TKNP: wins 1/5 categories
Great Lakes University of Kisumu - GLUK: wins 0/5 categories
Maasai Mara University: wins 0/5 categories
Ahram Canadian University: wins 0/5 categories
Tom Mboya University: wins 0/5 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Computer Science
kisumu, Kenya
4.50
Read more reviews
86 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Administration
Best programme: 3D Design
Best programme: Applied Statistics
Best programme: HR Management and Leadership
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
4.06
4.14
Win
4.00
Not rated
3.88
2.00
Not rated
Location
3.82
4.31
4.50
Not rated
4.50
1.50
Not rated
Professors
4.17
4.49
Win
4.00
Not rated
4.25
2.33
Not rated
Internationality
3.67
3.97
4.50
Win
Not rated
3.63
2.00
Not rated
Student life
3.94
4.21
Win
4.00
Not rated
3.75
1.83
Not rated
Value
4.22
4.53
Win
4.50
Not rated
4.38
2.33
Not rated
Accommodation
3.40
3.98
4.00
Not rated
4.00
1.83
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Passionate and helpful professors
  • +Modern facilities and engaging learning environment
  • +Strong sense of community and social connections
  • +Strong academic environment and practical learning focus
  • +Supportive atmosphere with approachable, passionate instructors
  • +Well-structured programmes with engaging teaching methods
  • +Practical, hands-on learning and career-oriented education
  • +Dedicated lecturers and supportive learning environment
  • +Development of essential soft skills and overall personal growth

Nothing to show

  • +Dedicated and knowledgeable lecturers
  • +Holistic learning and diverse activities
  • +Quality education and modern facilities
  • +Practical skills and real-world application focus
  • +Supportive professors and creative encouragement
  • +Modern facilities and friendly atmosphere

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment are a recurring concern.
  • -Course content and teaching methods are often unengaging or irrelevant.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
  • -Limited communication and transparency from the institution.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance.
  • -Inconsistent and unfair grading policies.
  • -Unresponsive and unhelpful administrative support.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor teaching quality and unengaging course content are common complaints.
  • -Lack of transparency and fairness in grading.
  • -Outdated curriculum and lack of modern industry relevance.
  • -Limited practical skill development for future careers.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

A comprehensive review indicates strong performance in several key areas, particularly concerning the value of education, which received a high rating. Professors are also highly regarded. Areas for potential improvement include accommodation, which scored the lowest, and internationality. Ratings for facilities, location, and student life are generally positive, suggesting a well-rounded university experience.

Overall, this university garners strong feedback, particularly excelling in the value of education, with a rating of 4.53. Professors also receive high marks at 4.49, alongside a positive student life experience at 4.21. The weakest areas appear to be accommodation and internationality, both scoring just under 4.0. Facilities and location also received solid, though not outstanding, scores.

This institution garners consistently high marks, with its **location** and **internationality** standing out as its strongest attributes at 4.5. Its **value for money** also received a top score of 4.5. Other aspects, including **facilities**, **professors**, **student life**, and **accommodation**, are all rated a solid 4, indicating a well-rounded and positive university experience across the board.

Nothing to show

The university demonstrates considerable strengths in its **Location** (4.5) and **Value** (4.375), alongside an impressive score for **Professors** (4.25). **Student Life** and **Accomodation** also received favorable marks. The **Internationality** aspect, however, registers as the lowest rated area at 3.625, with **Facilities** also performing slightly below average at 3.875.

This institution's assessment reveals a varied landscape of strengths and weaknesses. Its strongest areas, both scoring a solid 2, are Facilities and Internationality. Conversely, Location stands out as the weakest point, with a rating of 1.5. Professors and Value show moderate performance, while Student Life and Accommodation fall slightly below average.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4.4/5 from 20 reviews, ~90% are positive. Students praise knowledgeable and passionate professors, excellent facilities, and a vibrant campus community. There is minimal negative feedback.

With ~93% of 86 reviews being positive, students praise the university's supportive atmosphere, practical learning, and well-structured programs. No negative feedback was recorded.

With an average rating of 4.5/5, these 2 reviews are entirely positive. Students highlight excellent communication, teamwork, dedication, love for education, and the quality of courses and lecturers. Practical learning and supportive lecturers preparing students for real-world situations are also praised.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4.5/5, ~88% of reviewers are positive. Students commend dedicated lecturers, quality education, and a holistic learning environment. No negative feedback was provided.

With an average rating of 2.17/5, ~67% of reviews are negative. Students express frustration with outdated curriculum, lack of AI and modern tool instruction, and unfair grading. A few positive reviews highlight strong academic foundations and supportive professors.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
50%
60%
50%
0%
63%
17%
0%
4★
40%
31%
50%
0%
25%
17%
0%
3★
10%
8%
0%
0%
13%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
67%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Quality work in a small campus

It's a small campus compared to the other ones in Athens, but that is what makes it special. The facilities are maybe the best in Athens but the true benefit is the support and passion from the administration. At least in my CS department. If you truly have a passion for this field, there are quite a few professors that will help you excel and master the subject you are interested in. Apart from the professors, the rector of the course and the department head, which are all amazing in their job, and as I said really supportive, I want to mention the effort of the Career office for helping students get in the field and preparing them for their next steps. Excellent experience!

Nice place to be

I enjoyed learning at the university. The lectures were nice and students were nice to everyone, I found it easier to interact with everyone at school. However, life was tough in general due to lack of enough funds to support my student upkeep. But I recommend the school to anyone

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close