Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya - UPC vs PFH Private University of Applied Sciences vs Mount Kenya University - MKU vs Gretsa University vs West Visayas State University - WVSU
Side-by-side comparison from 190 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Excellent teaching quality and helpful professors.
- +Vibrant campus life and diverse extracurricular activities.
- +Supportive environment with good student welfare and flexible academic options.
- +Practical focus and dual study programs
- +Approachable instructors and small classes
- +Strong soft skills development
- +Supportive and knowledgeable lecturers
- +Flexible study options
- +Positive student community and co-curricular activities
- +Supportive and dedicated lecturers
- +Affordable fees and fast course completion
- +Inclusive and harmonious campus environment
- +Strong academic programs and excellent faculty
- +Commitment to producing competent professionals
- +Dedication to research and innovation
- +Supportive learning environment
- +Opportunities for growth and resilience
- +Deep understanding from lectures and helpful, kind tutors.
- +Welcoming atmosphere and access to recreational activities.
- +Opportunities for social connection and physical fitness.
- -Excessive difficulty and perceived unfairness in grading contribute to student dissatisfaction.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources hinder the learning experience.
- -Disappointing academic quality and hidden extra costs.
- -Disorganized academic processes and poor administrative support.
- -Rude staff and perceived corruption or bribery.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and technology are a common complaint.
- -Lack of support and communication creates frustration.
- -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a concern.
- -Lack of essential resources and support negatively impacts learning.
- -Administrative and management issues
- -Outdated facilities and resources
- -Lack of effective teaching and curriculum
- -Administrative & management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and inadequate resources are commonly cited problems.
- -Lack of effective communication and support from the institution is a recurring complaint.
Across a range of surveyed categories, this university demonstrates strong performance, particularly excelling in **Value** with a rating of 4.09. **Professors** also received a high mark at 3.97. Conversely, the **Location** and **Internationality** scores are relatively lower, both hovering around 3.75, indicating these areas might be considered for improvement. Overall, the institution maintains a solid standing in its facilities, student life, and accommodation.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its location, which received a high rating. However, areas requiring significant improvement include accommodation and student life, both receiving the lowest scores. Other aspects like facilities, professors, internationality, and value fall within a moderate to low range.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strength in its Facilities, scoring a high 4.41. Value also received a perfect 4.4 rating. Student life and internationality are well-regarded, with scores above 4.1. The weakest area is Accomodation, with a score of 3.95, indicating room for improvement. Overall, the university presents a solid academic and social environment.
Exceptional scores were awarded to this institution, particularly in the realms of professors and location, both receiving a perfect 5. Facilities, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value also garnered strong ratings, all sitting at a commendable 4.5. The university demonstrates a high level of quality across its offerings, with no areas falling below this impressive benchmark.
Professors, location, and value are outstanding strengths for this university, each scoring a near-perfect 4.67. Student life and internationality are also solid, both receiving a 4. Facilities and accommodation, while still respectable, represent the weakest areas with ratings of 3.67.
Assessing the university's performance reveals a varied landscape. Its strongest aspects lie in student life, internationality, and value, all earning high marks of 4. Conversely, facilities and accommodation received zero ratings, indicating significant areas for improvement. The quality of professors and the university's location both garnered moderate scores of 3.
Exhibiting an impressive and uniform performance, the institution received perfect scores across all evaluated aspects. The university excelled equally in its facilities, the quality of its professors, its desirable location, vibrant student life, and accommodation options. Furthermore, its international appeal and the overall value it offers students were also rated exceptionally high, indicating no discernible weaknesses among the surveyed areas.
Nearly all (99%) of the 94 reviews are positive, highlighting helpful teachers, good academic explanations, and excellent extracurricular activities. A small amount of feedback (1%) mentioned a perceived focus on difficulty over quality.
With an average rating of 3/5, student feedback is split, with roughly 50% positive and 50% negative. Positive comments highlight practical programs and accessible instructors, while negative reviews criticize a perceived lack of substance behind marketing efforts and unexpected costs.
Approximately 96.5% of reviews are positive, praising supportive lecturers, flexible study options, and a practical curriculum. A small percentage of negative feedback noted issues with administrative processes and staff approachability.
With all four reviews being positive (100%), students highlight a supportive learning environment, dedicated lecturers, and practical connections to the real world. Affordability, fast course completion, and a friendly, unifying atmosphere are also frequently praised.
With an average rating of 4.33/5 from 3 reviews, ~67% are positive. Students praise academic excellence, strong programs, and commitment to research and innovation. No negative reviews were submitted.
This university has a perfect 5/5 average rating based on one review. The feedback is overwhelmingly positive, with 100% of reviews being highly favorable.
With a perfect 5/5 average rating and 100% positive feedback, students highlight a deeply understanding and hospitable environment. They praise amazed, kind tutors and appreciate recreation centers like baseball, which also aids in making friends.
As a student of the UPC, it must be said that at the level of studies and teaching staff, both the one I have had as well as friends and acquaintances, is excellent. However, as far as facilities are concerned, it leaves much to be desired, and given the university's debt, small (and historical) faculties, such as the nautical one, are negatively affected by each management.
Nothing to show
It has efficient and reliable programmes which are tailored to suit the background of all students in terms of cost and service delivery.lecturers are competent and friendly .The management is top notch .
Gretsa university is a private university based in Thika town. The university has embraced the art of unifying all races from all over the world. Students admitted here study together in unity love each other and embrace peace. I am one of the championing ambassadors of peace and unity on campus and I love seeing students live in harmony. Gretsa university is my home.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
