Sciences Po vs Université de Poitiers vs emlyon business school vs EM Normandie - EM Normandie vs Clermont School of Business
Side-by-side comparison from 193 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Interdisciplinary curriculum with practical applications
- +Networking opportunities and vibrant student life
- +Prestigious institution with accomplished faculty
- +Approachable, invested, and knowledgeable faculty
- +Stimulating and supportive academic environment
- +Clean, comfortable, and well-maintained facilities
- +Practical, international focus and diverse student body.
- +Strong career support and professional experience opportunities.
- +Diverse program options and personal project development.
- +Connecting theory to practice through real-world cases.
- +Diverse international environment and global opportunities.
- +Relevant industry-focused courses and knowledgeable faculty.
- +Practical industry application and real-world expertise from professors.
- +Diverse, international student community fostering multicultural experiences.
- +Personalized academic journey with flexible course options.
- +Culturally diverse environment and international campus access
- +Supportive and organized academic environment with helpful instructors
- +Opportunities for career advancement and independent learning
- +Strong aerospace focus with practical application.
- +Vibrant student life and numerous associations.
- +Good balance of theory and practice.
- -Administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities and academic methods.
- -Poor teaching quality and lack of preparation.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources impede learning.
- -Poor communication and lack of support from staff are common complaints.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and unclear expectations lead to dissatisfaction.
- -Perceived as a money-making scheme with mediocre teaching.
- -Poor quality of teaching and relevance to career preparation.
- -Lack of substantial learning and qualified speakers.
- -Lack of extracurriculars and limited opportunities for lower-year students.
- -Poor campus environment and a perceived low academic standard.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support is a problem.
Internationality and location stand out as the university's strongest attributes, receiving exceptional ratings. Conversely, accommodation presents the weakest area, scoring significantly lower than other categories. Professors, student life, and value are all rated positively, indicating a well-rounded experience, though facilities fall in the middle ground.
This institution shows a generally positive reception across its evaluated aspects. Student life stands out as a particular strength, achieving the highest rating. Conversely, location and value for money received the lowest scores among the surveyed categories. Facilities and accommodation are also well-regarded, with professors and internationality performing strongly.
This institution demonstrates a generally positive standing, with its strongest areas being **Location** and **Internationality**, both scoring above 4.6. **Student Life** and **Value** also received high marks, around 4.3 and 4.49 respectively. The **Facilities** and **Professors** are rated well, in the low 4s. **Accomodation** appears to be the relatively weakest area, with a score of 4.
This institution performs well across most aspects, with **Internationality** standing out as its strongest area. Facilities, Professors, and Value also receive high marks. Areas for potential improvement include **Location**, which scored the lowest, and Accomodation. Student life and the overall value proposition are rated solidly in the mid-to-high range.
This university garners strong evaluations across multiple aspects. Its internationality stands out as a particular strength, receiving the highest rating. Student life and professors are also highly regarded. The weakest area identified is accommodation, which, while still rated positively, falls below the university's other strong categories.
With a strong emphasis on location and internationality, this university also scores very well for its professors and student life. Value for money is also a positive aspect. The weakest areas, while still respectable, are its facilities and accommodation.
This institution receives its highest accolades for student life and facilities, both scoring well above average. Conversely, the location emerges as a significant concern, with a considerably lower rating. Other areas like professors, accommodation, and value present a more moderate, positive picture, while internationality falls somewhere in the middle.
Around 96% of reviews are positive, highlighting interdisciplinary education, strong academics, and vibrant student life. A small percentage (~4%) express concerns about teaching methods and academic staff preparation.
With an average rating of 4.13/5 from 16 reviews, approximately 100% of feedback is positive. Students frequently praise approachable and invested teachers, quality lessons, and a clean, comfortable study environment.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~90% 4-5 stars) with an average rating of 4.53/5. Students praise the academic rigor, practical and international focus, and diverse student body.
Most reviews (approximately 71%) highlight a positive learning atmosphere, inspiring professors, and valuable international experiences. A small amount of feedback (around 14%) suggests mediocrity and a focus on profit. The average rating is 3.86/5.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (around 98%), with an average rating of 4.68/5. Students praise the high-quality teaching, professors' real-world expertise, and the diverse, international student community. One negative review cited a lack of job-ready skills and unqualified speakers.
With a 4.54/5 average rating, nearly all students praise Schiller for its culturally rich environment and global opportunities. A small portion of feedback (~7.7%) suggests the university may be better suited for those seeking a less demanding academic path.
Students praise extensive practical aerospace training and vibrant student life with numerous associations. The university's isolated location is a recurring concern, though positive feedback suggests it doesn't overshadow the strong sense of community.
I'm an exchange student in the Reims campus in the academic year of 2023-2024. I think this campus is good for an exchange experience because there are a lot of exchange students and even the french people who come to the grad school don't live in Reims, so basically everyone on the campus is new to the city and wants to form a bond. In terms of academic experience, I think Sciences Po system is really controlling. Their attendance policy is really strict and all the classes have an assignment for the week, either a presentation or an evaluation, which makes the semester exhausting since the beginning. Also, I didn't like the fact that in some classes there are only presentations made by students and no later explanation by the professor. I don't like this method because I think the students only focus on preparing their presentation and we don't really pay attention to the presentation of the other classmates as much as we would pay as if the professor was presenting. To summarize, I still love some of my classes, but I had higher expectations about Sciences Po's method, since it's the best political sciences university in Europe, which made me a little disappointed.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
As a student, I’ve been impressed by the professionalism and expertise of the professors, who bring real-world experience into the classroom, making learning both relevant and practical. The student body is equally diverse, with classmates from all over the world, which creates a rich, multicultural environment that enhances the overall experience. The administration also supports this international mix, ensuring that students from different countries feel welcomed and well-supported throughout their studies.
I loved being at Schiller in Heidelberg. The setting and the city were very serene and the exposure to all those students and teachers from such different and diverse backgrounds was a great learning experience. Additionally, the ease of accessing the Schiller campuses in the other countries was a great additional bonus to studying at Schiller. I would most definitely recommend Schiller to other students who are looking for a very culturally fulfilling experience.
Nothing to show
