Swiss School of Management - SSM vs The British University in Egypt vs German International University - GIU vs Faculty of Applied Arts Helwan University vs Assiut University

Side-by-side comparison from 32 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Swiss School of Management - SSM (5.00)
Swiss School of Management - SSM: wins 4/6 categories
The British University in Egypt: wins 0/6 categories
German International University - GIU: wins 2/6 categories
Faculty of Applied Arts Helwan University: wins 0/6 categories
Assiut University: wins 0/6 categories
Faculty of Pharmacy Cairo University: wins 0/6 categories
High Institute For Computers and Management Information: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Bellinzona, Switzerland
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
3 reviews
×
Best programme: Bachelor of Business Administration
Best programme: Bachelor of Nursing
Best programme: Engineering Sciences
Best programme: Art History
Best programme: Bachelor of Medicine
Best programme: Clinical Pharmacy
Category ratings
Facilities
4.67
4.63
5.00
Win
4.50
3.50
3.00
Not rated
Location
5.00
Win
4.36
3.00
3.50
4.00
2.50
Not rated
Professors
4.33
3.94
4.50
Win
4.00
3.86
4.00
Not rated
Internationality
5.00
Win
3.94
4.50
3.00
4.14
3.00
Not rated
Student life
4.33
4.33
3.00
4.00
3.71
2.50
Not rated
Value
5.00
Win
4.31
4.50
4.00
3.57
3.50
Not rated
Accommodation
5.00
Win
4.13
3.50
3.50
3.57
2.00
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Practical, real-world preparation
  • +Personal and professional growth
  • +International experience
  • +Expert, supportive professors and rigorous, challenging academics
  • +High-quality campus facilities and learning resources
  • +Vibrant campus life, social activities, and diverse student body
  • +Hands-on learning and real-world projects
  • +Engaging coursework and exciting assignments
  • +Global student community and international experience
  • +Supportive lecturers & practical, rewarding courses
  • +Modern facilities & equipment
  • +Strong faculty and diverse programs
  • +Excellent medical and clinical training
  • +Positive campus environment and facilities
  • +Excellent professors and strong practical training
  • +High-quality pharmaceutical education and career opportunities
  • +Well-structured curriculum and research exposure

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Frustrating administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
  • -Lack of engaging and relevant curriculum.
  • -Unhelpful professors and poor social engagement were major disappointments.
  • -Limited and exclusive extracurriculars restricted student participation.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance detract from the learning experience.
  • -Lack of essential resources and support hinders academic progress.
  • -Poor administrative support and unclear communication plague students.
  • -Facilities are consistently described as outdated and in need of improvement.
  • -Course content is often perceived as irrelevant and lacking in practical application.
  • -Administrative & management issues
  • -Outdated facilities
  • -Lack of resources & support
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of support and unclear communication lead to dissatisfaction.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution boasts exceptional scores in several key areas, notably achieving perfect marks for **Location**, **Accomodation**, **Internationality**, and **Value**. The **Facilities** also stand out with a strong rating of 4.67. Areas showing slightly less consistent strength, though still positive, include **Professors** and **Student Life**, both rated at 4.33.

This university garners excellent marks for its facilities, achieving a high score of 4.63. Student life and value also stand out with strong ratings around 4.33 and 4.31 respectively. Accommodation is well-regarded at 4.13. However, the university's professors and internationality received the lowest ratings, both scoring 3.94. The location also scored a respectable 4.36.

An assessment of the university reveals particularly strong performance in facilities, professors, internationality, and value, all receiving high scores. Conversely, location, student life, and accommodation represent areas with comparatively lower ratings. The overall profile suggests a university excelling in academic and amenity aspects, while facing some challenges in its geographical placement and student experience offerings.

This institution shines particularly in its **Facilities**, receiving a high score of 4.5. Other well-regarded aspects include **Professors** and **Student Life**, both rated at 4. The **Internationality** score, at 3, represents the area with the lowest rating among the surveyed categories, along with **Location** and **Accomodation**, which both sit at 3.5. Overall, the university demonstrates a solid performance with notable strengths and some areas for potential improvement.

This institution garners its highest marks for **Internationality** and **Location**, both receiving over 4.0. Conversely, **Facilities** and **Accomodation** are rated at a respectable 3.5, representing the lower end of its evaluated strengths. The university also scores well in **Student Life** and **Value**, indicating a generally positive overall perception across these metrics. Professors are also well-regarded, with a score close to 3.9.

When evaluating this institution, professors emerge as a significant strength with a rating of 4. Conversely, accommodation presents the weakest area, scoring just 2. The university also received moderate scores across facilities, internationality, and value. Student life and location were rated slightly below average.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

All three reviews are overwhelmingly positive, awarding a perfect 5/5 rating. Students highlight the university's encouragement of creativity and practical, real-world business preparation. The international experience and the balance between theory and practice are also frequently praised.

Nearly all feedback (approximately 94%) is positive, highlighting rigorous academics, expert professors, and good facilities. A small amount of criticism (~6%) notes limited social life and occasional administrative responsiveness issues.

With an average rating of 4.5/5, these two reviews are 100% positive. Students praise hands-on learning, real-world projects, and global experiences, noting excellent coursework and opportunities.

With an average rating of 4.5/5 from two reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive. Students highlighted life-changing experiences, academically rewarding courses combining theory and practice, and supportive lecturers. Minimal negative feedback was noted regarding administrative delays.

Six of seven reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.14/5. Students praise diverse learning, quality faculty, and strong medical programs. Limited funding for research supplies was noted once.

With an average rating of 4/5 from 2 reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students highlight a strong pharmaceutical education, experienced professors, and excellent career opportunities. There are no negative reviews.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
100%
44%
50%
50%
29%
0%
0%
4★
0%
44%
50%
50%
57%
100%
0%
3★
0%
6%
0%
0%
14%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
6%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close