Swiss School of Management - SSM vs The British University in Egypt vs German International University - GIU vs Egyptian Russian University vs Assiut University

Side-by-side comparison from 29 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Swiss School of Management - SSM (5.00)
Swiss School of Management - SSM: wins 4/6 categories
The British University in Egypt: wins 0/6 categories
German International University - GIU: wins 1/6 categories
Egyptian Russian University: wins 1/6 categories
Assiut University: wins 0/6 categories
modern academy: wins 0/6 categories
Egyptian Chinese University - ECU: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Bellinzona, Switzerland
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
3 reviews
×
Best programme: Bachelor of Business Administration
Best programme: Bachelor of Nursing
Best programme: Engineering Sciences
Best programme: Electronics and Telecommunication
Best programme: Bachelor of Medicine
Cairo, Egypt
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
4.67
4.63
5.00
Win
3.00
3.50
Not rated
Not rated
Location
5.00
Win
4.36
3.00
2.00
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
4.33
3.94
4.50
5.00
Win
3.86
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
5.00
Win
3.94
4.50
3.00
4.14
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
4.33
4.33
3.00
3.00
3.71
Not rated
Not rated
Value
5.00
Win
4.31
4.50
3.00
3.57
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
5.00
Win
4.13
3.50
1.00
3.57
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Practical, real-world preparation
  • +Personal and professional growth
  • +International experience
  • +Expert, supportive professors and rigorous, challenging academics
  • +High-quality campus facilities and learning resources
  • +Vibrant campus life, social activities, and diverse student body
  • +Hands-on learning and real-world projects
  • +Engaging coursework and exciting assignments
  • +Global student community and international experience
  • +Strong international focus and challenging courses
  • +Dedicated faculty and close-knit community
  • +Unique educational experience
  • +Strong faculty and diverse programs
  • +Excellent medical and clinical training
  • +Positive campus environment and facilities

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Frustrating administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
  • -Lack of engaging and relevant curriculum.
  • -Unhelpful professors and poor social engagement were major disappointments.
  • -Limited and exclusive extracurriculars restricted student participation.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance detract from the learning experience.
  • -Lack of essential resources and support hinders academic progress.
  • -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a common complaint.
  • -Lack of resources and limited course availability frustrate students.
  • -Administrative & management issues
  • -Outdated facilities
  • -Lack of resources & support

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution boasts exceptional scores in several key areas, notably achieving perfect marks for **Location**, **Accomodation**, **Internationality**, and **Value**. The **Facilities** also stand out with a strong rating of 4.67. Areas showing slightly less consistent strength, though still positive, include **Professors** and **Student Life**, both rated at 4.33.

This university garners excellent marks for its facilities, achieving a high score of 4.63. Student life and value also stand out with strong ratings around 4.33 and 4.31 respectively. Accommodation is well-regarded at 4.13. However, the university's professors and internationality received the lowest ratings, both scoring 3.94. The location also scored a respectable 4.36.

An assessment of the university reveals particularly strong performance in facilities, professors, internationality, and value, all receiving high scores. Conversely, location, student life, and accommodation represent areas with comparatively lower ratings. The overall profile suggests a university excelling in academic and amenity aspects, while facing some challenges in its geographical placement and student experience offerings.

This institution demonstrates significant strengths in faculty quality, receiving a perfect score. However, it faces considerable challenges regarding accommodation, which received the lowest possible rating. Facilities, student life, internationality, and overall value are rated moderately. The location is also identified as a weaker area, with a score of two.

This institution garners its highest marks for **Internationality** and **Location**, both receiving over 4.0. Conversely, **Facilities** and **Accomodation** are rated at a respectable 3.5, representing the lower end of its evaluated strengths. The university also scores well in **Student Life** and **Value**, indicating a generally positive overall perception across these metrics. Professors are also well-regarded, with a score close to 3.9.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

All three reviews are overwhelmingly positive, awarding a perfect 5/5 rating. Students highlight the university's encouragement of creativity and practical, real-world business preparation. The international experience and the balance between theory and practice are also frequently praised.

Nearly all feedback (approximately 94%) is positive, highlighting rigorous academics, expert professors, and good facilities. A small amount of criticism (~6%) notes limited social life and occasional administrative responsiveness issues.

With an average rating of 4.5/5, these two reviews are 100% positive. Students praise hands-on learning, real-world projects, and global experiences, noting excellent coursework and opportunities.

The sole review for Egyptian Russian University is positive, with an average rating of 4/5 stars. Positive feedback highlights the international focus and challenging courses, though minor administrative issues were noted.

Six of seven reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.14/5. Students praise diverse learning, quality faculty, and strong medical programs. Limited funding for research supplies was noted once.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
100%
44%
50%
0%
29%
0%
0%
4★
0%
44%
50%
100%
57%
0%
0%
3★
0%
6%
0%
0%
14%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
6%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close