Swiss School of Management - SSM vs Arab Academy for Science, Technology and Maritime Transport - AASTMT vs German University in Cairo - GUC vs Zewail City of Science and Technology vs Thebes Higher Institute for Engineering

Side-by-side comparison from 43 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Swiss School of Management - SSM (5.00)
Swiss School of Management - SSM: wins 5/7 categories
Arab Academy for Science, Technology and Maritime Transport - AASTMT: wins 0/7 categories
German University in Cairo - GUC: wins 2/7 categories
Zewail City of Science and Technology: wins 0/7 categories
Thebes Higher Institute for Engineering: wins 0/7 categories
Faculty of Pharmacy Cairo University: wins 0/7 categories
High Institute For Computers and Management Information: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Bellinzona, Switzerland
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
3 reviews
×
Best programme: Bachelor of Business Administration
Best programme: Architectural Engineering
Best programme: Computer Engineering
Best programme: Aerospace Engineering
Best programme: Clinical Pharmacy
Category ratings
Facilities
4.67
Win
3.74
4.60
4.00
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
Location
5.00
Win
3.71
4.11
3.20
Not rated
2.50
Not rated
Professors
4.33
4.13
4.60
Win
4.40
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Internationality
5.00
Win
3.91
3.60
3.20
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
Student life
4.33
3.48
4.40
Win
3.00
Not rated
2.50
Not rated
Value
5.00
Win
4.17
4.40
4.40
Not rated
3.50
Not rated
Accommodation
5.00
Win
3.64
3.36
3.60
Not rated
2.00
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Practical, real-world preparation
  • +Personal and professional growth
  • +International experience
  • +Practical skill development and future career preparation
  • +Supportive and engaging campus atmosphere with diverse fields of study
  • +Internationally recognized and respected degrees
  • +High-quality, practical education with global competitiveness
  • +Strong career preparation and development of essential soft skills
  • +Vibrant and supportive creative or like-minded community
  • +Expert professors and high-quality education
  • +Hands-on learning and practical experience
  • +Supportive staff and well-equipped campus

Nothing to show

  • +Excellent professors and strong practical training
  • +High-quality pharmaceutical education and career opportunities
  • +Well-structured curriculum and research exposure

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Frustrating administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
  • -Lack of engaging and relevant curriculum.
  • -Limited student life and campus facilities.
  • -Lack of parking and dining options.
  • -Insufficient university expansion for student needs.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
  • -Lack of adequate support for students, both academic and personal, is a recurring problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
  • -Course content is irrelevant or poorly delivered.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of support and unclear communication lead to dissatisfaction.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution boasts exceptional scores in several key areas, notably achieving perfect marks for **Location**, **Accomodation**, **Internationality**, and **Value**. The **Facilities** also stand out with a strong rating of 4.67. Areas showing slightly less consistent strength, though still positive, include **Professors** and **Student Life**, both rated at 4.33.

Review of the university indicates a strong performance in academics, with the highest ratings for **Value** (4.17) and **Professors** (4.13). **Internationality** also scores well at 3.91. Conversely, **Student Life** received the lowest rating (3.48), suggesting this is an area for potential improvement. Other aspects like Facilities, Location, and Accomodation fall within a moderate to good range.

This institution receives excellent marks for its **Facilities** (4.6) and **Professors** (4.6), suggesting high-quality learning environments and academic instruction. **Student Life** (4.4) and **Value** (4.4) also score well. However, **Accomodation** (3.36) presents the lowest-rated aspect, along with **Internationality** (3.6), indicating areas for potential improvement compared to other surveyed categories. **Location** (4.11) falls in the mid-to-high range.

Across surveyed categories, the university demonstrates a solid performance, with its strongest areas being **Professors** and **Value**, both receiving a high rating of 4.4. Facilities also scored well at 4. Facilities and professors are notable strengths, while student life and location represent areas with the lowest ratings, at 3 and 3.2 respectively.

Nothing to show

When evaluating this institution, professors emerge as a significant strength with a rating of 4. Conversely, accommodation presents the weakest area, scoring just 2. The university also received moderate scores across facilities, internationality, and value. Student life and location were rated slightly below average.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

All three reviews are overwhelmingly positive, awarding a perfect 5/5 rating. Students highlight the university's encouragement of creativity and practical, real-world business preparation. The international experience and the balance between theory and practice are also frequently praised.

With a 4.09 average rating from 23 reviews, approximately 83% highlight growth and skill development through challenging coursework and formative experiences. A small amount of feedback (~4%) mentions poor student life and lack of campus activities.

Reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with an average rating of 4.7/5. Students highlight high-quality education, excellent preparation for the job market with technical and soft skills, and a vibrant, supportive creative community. No negative feedback was recorded.

Students highly rate academics, professors, and facilities, with ~100% positive feedback. Some noted a need for better course organization and more student life engagement.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4/5 from 2 reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students highlight a strong pharmaceutical education, experienced professors, and excellent career opportunities. There are no negative reviews.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
100%
30%
70%
40%
0%
0%
0%
4★
0%
52%
30%
60%
0%
100%
0%
3★
0%
13%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
4%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Top-Notch Education!

My university, Zewail City of Science and Technology, is a fantastic option for a high-quality education. I've had nothing but great experiences, from teachers to student services. The support team is usually kind and eager to assist with any academic or social adjustment issues. The lectures are delivered by qualified professors who have years of expertise and are up to speed on the latest research. Furthermore, the school provides all of the required amenities for students, such as computer laboratories, sports facilities, and scientific labs. Not to mention the numerous activities and events that encourage student invention and creativity. All of this contributes to my great overall experience at Zewail City of Science and Technology. I would very much recommend it to anyone looking to pursue higher education.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close