Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences - HRO vs University of Lodz - UL vs Digital Technology Institute vs Redeemer's University Ede - RUN vs Federal Polytechnic Ede - Fedepe

Side-by-side comparison from 140 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences - HRO: wins 1/3 categories
University of Lodz - UL: wins 0/3 categories
Digital Technology Institute: wins 0/3 categories
Redeemer's University Ede - RUN: wins 0/3 categories
Federal Polytechnic Ede - Fedepe: wins 1/3 categories
Meenakshi Academy of Higher Education and Research: wins 1/3 categories
The National Ribat University - NRU: wins 0/3 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Bachelor of International Studies
Best programme: Biology
Best programme: English
Best programme: Library and Information Science
Best programme: Mathematics
Category ratings
Facilities
4.71
3.99
Not rated
3.97
5.00
5.00
Not rated
Location
4.71
4.27
Not rated
3.73
5.00
5.00
Not rated
Professors
4.14
4.14
Not rated
4.24
5.00
5.00
Not rated
Internationality
4.57
Win
4.15
Not rated
3.73
4.00
4.00
Not rated
Student life
4.29
4.01
Not rated
3.97
5.00
5.00
Not rated
Value
4.43
4.24
Not rated
4.24
4.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
Accommodation
3.40
3.90
Not rated
3.72
5.00
Win
3.00
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Real-world learning, hands-on projects, and industry focus
  • +International environment and diverse student body
  • +Program flexibility and personalized learning paths
  • +High-quality education with excellent, approachable professors and a supportive atmosphere.
  • +Diverse, international, and social environment with many opportunities.
  • +Modern, well-equipped facilities and a positive urban setting.

Nothing to show

  • +Stable academic calendar and conducive learning environment
  • +Supportive, approachable, and dedicated faculty
  • +Affordable tuition and good student accommodation
  • +Quality education and enlightening experience
  • +Conducive learning environment
  • +Accommodating lecturers
  • +Diverse course offerings and in-depth syllabus
  • +Supportive and effective teaching staff
  • +Equal opportunities for academic and extracurricular pursuits

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues are frequently cited.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a common complaint.
  • -Course content is often perceived as irrelevant or poorly structured.
  • -Excessive administrative burdens and lack of efficient management.
  • -Outdated or poorly maintained facilities and resources.
  • -Unengaging curriculum and ineffective teaching methods.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a recurring problem.
  • -Poor communication and unclear expectations from the institution are consistently criticized.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
  • -Limited opportunities for practical experience and career development are disappointing.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor equipment hinder learning.
  • -Lack of career support and job opportunities is a concern.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Campus amenities and its geographical setting stand out with the highest scores. Conversely, accommodation received the lowest rating. Other areas, including professors, student life, internationality, and value, all scored well above average, indicating a generally positive university experience.

This institution garners strong ratings across several key areas. Location and value are particularly well-regarded, achieving scores over 4.2. Internationality and professors also score highly, exceeding 4.1. While student life and accommodation are rated positively, facilities represent the weakest area among the surveyed categories.

Nothing to show

In its latest review, the institution demonstrates notable strengths in both **Professors** and **Value**, achieving identical high scores. Conversely, **Accomodation** received the lowest rating among the surveyed aspects. Other areas like Facilities, Student Life, and Internationality fall within a moderate to good range, indicating a well-rounded but not uniformly exceptional experience.

This educational institution receives outstanding marks, with perfect scores across facilities, professors, location, student life, and accommodation. Internationality is rated highly at a 4 out of 5, while the value proposition also stands at a strong 4. Overall, the university demonstrates excellence in most aspects of the student experience.

This institution excels in several key areas, earning perfect scores for its facilities, professors, location, student life, and overall value. However, its accommodation receives a lower rating, indicating room for improvement in this specific aspect. Internationality is also a strong point, though not reaching the maximum score.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

All 7 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.57/5. Students highlight hands-on learning, real-world experience, and international environments. Some wish for more structured courses or specific technical knowledge.

With a 4.13/5 average rating from 98 reviews, ~94% are positive, highlighting a high-quality education, supportive academic staff, and a social, dynamic city. No negative feedback was received.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4.03/5 from 33 reviews, ~85% are positive. Students praise the stable academic calendar, excellent faculty, conducive learning environment, and affordable tuition. Minimal negative feedback was noted.

This university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with a perfect 5/5 average rating. The single review highlights sound and quality education, a conducive environment, and accommodating lecturers. There is no negative feedback.

With one review, the university received a perfect 5/5 rating. This positive feedback (~100%) highlighted excellent opportunities for studies and sports, along with good and friendly teachers and effective teaching methods.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
57%
17%
0%
18%
100%
100%
0%
4★
43%
79%
0%
67%
0%
0%
0%
3★
0%
4%
0%
15%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Designing My Own Study Path

Studying International Business we moved to a new building in my third year of University. The new building is amazing and has an encouraging atmosphere. I am constantly surrounded by different cultures and encouraged to meet new people. I was able to design my own learning path, choose topics I was interested in, and study abroad. The course could be a little more structured and I think the university could work on its communication sometimes, but overall I am really satisfied with my decision.

amazing experience

I was an international student at the University of Lodz in Poland. I am very happy that I choose this university for my masters studies. May be for some one its not but the overall discipline is appreciable.

Nothing to show

What can i say about my univeristy?

Redeemer's University is a faith-based educational institution that prioritise learning, lectures and a conducive environment for its students, that is a major advantage of the school. speaking on disadvantages the school needs to work on its accomodation and feeding services.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close