Université Rennes-II-Haute-Bretagne vs Université de Rennes I vs EPITECH - EPITECH vs TELECOM Bretagne vs Agrocampus Ouest
Side-by-side comparison from 14 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Supportive professors and challenging courses
- +Welcoming atmosphere and cultural immersion
- +Expert faculty and diverse academic programs
- +Welcoming environment and engaging campus life
- +Beautiful and well-equipped campus facilities
- +High-quality, balanced training with relevant topics.
- +Strong company network for work-study and employment.
Nothing to show
- +Comprehensive horticulture and landscaping programs
- +Strong sense of community and collective spirit
- +Abundant extracurricular activities
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Administrative & management issues cause frustration and inefficiency.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
- -Lack of adequate support and resources impacts student success.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are consistently disappointing.
- -Lack of clear communication and support creates uncertainty.
- -Administrative and management issues, with a focus on profit over student well-being and quality of education.
- -Lack of soft skills oriented learning, despite a strong technical environment.
- -High cost of education.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are common complaints.
- -Unclear communication and insufficient support hinder student experience.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This institution garners positive marks across several key areas, with **Professors** receiving the highest rating at 4.5. Facilities, Location, Student Life, and Accomodation are all rated a solid 4. The university also performs reasonably well in terms of Value, scoring 3.5. The primary area for potential improvement is **Internationality**, which received the lowest rating of 3.
Overall, this institution garners strong positive feedback. Student life and accommodation stand out as the highest-rated aspects, both achieving a score of approximately 4.17. The university also received solid ratings of 4 for facilities, professors, internationality, and value. Location is the lowest-scoring area, though still rated positively at 3.8.
This institution garners excellent scores, particularly in its student life and internationality, both receiving perfect marks. Professors are also highly regarded with a top rating. Facilities and location are strong points, both at 4.5. Value for money is rated well at 4.5. The weakest area identified is accommodation, with a rating of 3.5.
Nothing to show
This institution receives particularly strong marks for its vibrant student life, achieving a perfect score. Areas for potential improvement include facilities and accommodation, both rated at a moderate three. Professors, location, and overall value are well-regarded, each earning a solid four. Internationality also sits at a respectable three.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 4/5, the 2 reviews indicate overwhelmingly positive sentiment (~100%). Students praise the enriching experience, challenging courses, and supportive professors, particularly within the international exchange program.
All 6 reviews are positive, averaging 4/5 stars. Students praise the dynamic academic setting, diverse programs, expert faculty, and well-maintained facilities. Some mention a desire for better parking and cafeteria food.
Reviews are mixed, with a 3/5 average. ~40% of feedback is negative, citing high cost and lack of student well-being support. Positive feedback highlights excellent training and good employment networks.
Nothing to show
With a 4/5 average rating from one review, this university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback (~100%). The single review highlights strong academic programs in Horticulture and Landscaping, a good collective atmosphere, and ample after-school activities.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show