Rennes School of Business vs emlyon business school vs EM Normandie - EM Normandie vs ESSCA School of Management vs Le Cordon Bleu Paris
Side-by-side comparison from 105 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Excellent faculty and stimulating academic environment
- +Strong international student community and welcoming atmosphere
- +Conducive learning environment with good facilities and practical focus
- +Practical, international focus and diverse student body.
- +Strong career support and professional experience opportunities.
- +Diverse program options and personal project development.
- +Industry-relevant courses for job readiness
- +Positive learning atmosphere and helpful, knowledgeable professors
- +Valuable international exposure and personal/professional development
- +International focus and diverse programs
- +Experiential learning and networking opportunities
- +Supportive professors and student community
- +Exceptional chef instructors and curriculum quality.
- +Strong emphasis on skill development and practical experience.
- +Valuable international reputation and alumni network.
- +Approachable and supportive professors
- +Practical learning and real-world experience
- +International environment and personal development
- +Well-ranked programs and career opportunities
- +Supportive learning environment and smaller class sizes
- +Excellent campus location and facilities
- -Administrative and management issues, especially for international students.
- -Poor English communication and fluency from both administration and some professors.
- -Lack of inclusivity and accessibility for non-French speakers.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and unclear expectations lead to dissatisfaction.
- -Poor quality education and value for money.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequently criticized.
- -Lack of engaging teaching and curriculum concerns are common complaints.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment.
- -Poor communication and administrative support.
- -Lack of practical application and relevance in coursework.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -A lack of communication and support from the institution is prevalent.
- -Poor communication and administrative issues.
- -Outdated facilities and technology.
- -Uninspiring teaching and curriculum.
An assessment of the university reveals strong student life and internationality, with ratings of 4.41 and 4.34 respectively. Professors and location also received favorable scores. The weakest area identified is accommodation, which scored 3.82. Overall, facilities and value were rated well, indicating a generally positive experience for students in these aspects.
This institution demonstrates a generally positive standing, with its strongest areas being **Location** and **Internationality**, both scoring above 4.6. **Student Life** and **Value** also received high marks, around 4.3 and 4.49 respectively. The **Facilities** and **Professors** are rated well, in the low 4s. **Accomodation** appears to be the relatively weakest area, with a score of 4.
This institution garners high marks in several key areas. Its Facilities, Professors, and Value are all rated consistently well at 3.83. Internationality stands out as a significant strength with a perfect score of 4. Conversely, Accomodation is a weaker point, rated at 3.2, with Location also receiving a comparatively lower score of 3.33. Student Life falls in the middle with a rating of 3.5.
The university demonstrates considerable strengths, notably in its **Professors** and **Internationality**, both earning a high rating of 4.5. **Student Life** and **Value** also score very well at 4.33. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents the weakest area with a rating of 2.83. **Facilities** are rated at 3.5, and **Location** at 3.67, indicating room for improvement in these aspects.
Performance varies across key aspects of university life. Outstanding ratings were awarded for Location (4.75) and Professors (4.625), alongside strong marks for Internationality (4.625) and Facilities (4.5). Student Life (3.875) and Value (4.125) received good scores. Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, with a rating of 3.
Receiving perfect scores across the board, this institution excels in all evaluated aspects. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value are all rated as outstanding. With a consistent five-star performance across every category, there are no discernible weak areas to highlight. The university demonstrates a uniformly strong offering.
This institution demonstrates considerable strengths in its **professors, location, and student life**, all receiving high marks. Facilities are also rated well. Areas needing improvement include **internationality**, which is the lowest-rated aspect, and accommodation and value, both of which are in the middle range.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~97% of feedback praising excellent faculty, practical learning, and a supportive international community. A small amount of negative feedback (~3%) highlights administrative and communication issues, particularly for international students.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~90% 4-5 stars) with an average rating of 4.53/5. Students praise the academic rigor, practical and international focus, and diverse student body.
With a 3.67/5 average, most reviews are positive (~74%), highlighting personal growth, industry-relevant courses, and a good learning atmosphere. One negative review (~16.7%) criticizes the school as a money-making scheme with mediocre teaching.
With an average rating of 4.17/5 from 6 reviews, ~83% are positive, highlighting international focus, experiential learning, and networking. Some note demanding workloads.
All eight student reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.63/5. Students highly praise the knowledgeable instructors, quality curriculum, and enriching learning experience.
Both reviews are overwhelmingly positive, rating the university 5/5. Students praise the program's fulfillment of expectations, approachable professors, practical learning, and strong industry connections. The international environment and focus on personal development are also highlighted.
With a 4.67/5 average rating from three reviews, student feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Recurring themes highlight a good program, a well-equipped campus, and a conducive teaching environment.
The school stands out as an exemplary institution with commendable features. The accommodation facilities are not only comfortable but also designed to foster a conducive learning environment. The faculty comprises diverse, highly qualified educators, ensuring a high standard of education. The emphasis on practical learning prepares students effectively for real-world scenarios. The institution offers a top-notch academic experience combined with excellent living standards, making it a highly recommended choice for those seeking quality education.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
ESSCA School of Management is known for its international approach and diverse programs. In my opinion, many students appreciate its emphasis on experiential learning and the opportunities for international exposure through exchange programs and internships. However, some may find the workload demanding and challenging but that's the way it operates. Whether I recommend it would depend on your specific academic and career goals, as well as your preferences for learning style and environment. Likes/ Dislikes: *Essca provides enormous opportunities to improve and enhance your skill. *Diversified culture *Provides webinars and seminars across all the campuses. *Workload Management could be seen as an disadvantage. As sometimes, you may find it very challenging.
I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
