Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology - JKUAT vs University of Eldoret vs Daystar University vs Laikipia University vs KIRIRI Women's University of Science and Technology - KWUST

Side-by-side comparison from 217 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: University of Eldoret (4.80)
Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology - JKUAT: wins 0/6 categories
University of Eldoret: wins 3/6 categories
Daystar University: wins 1/6 categories
Laikipia University: wins 0/6 categories
KIRIRI Women's University of Science and Technology - KWUST: wins 2/6 categories
Kenya Medical Training College: wins 0/6 categories
Tharaka University - TUN: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Actuarial Mathematics
4.80
Top
Read more reviews
18 reviews
×
Best programme: Applied Statistics and Programming
Nairobi, Kenya
4.50
Read more reviews
41 reviews
×
Best programme: Bachelor of Nursing
Best programme: Agriculture
Best programme: Business Administration
Best programme: Environmental Sciences
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
4.04
4.41
4.46
3.20
4.67
Win
3.75
Not rated
Location
4.46
4.71
Win
4.28
4.00
3.33
4.00
Not rated
Professors
4.32
4.39
4.27
4.20
4.67
Win
4.00
Not rated
Internationality
3.95
4.28
4.34
Win
2.80
2.33
3.00
Not rated
Student life
4.27
4.53
Win
4.22
3.40
4.00
2.75
Not rated
Value
4.35
4.67
4.51
4.00
4.67
4.25
Not rated
Accommodation
3.68
4.31
Win
3.90
2.75
4.00
2.25
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Strong STEM, agriculture, and technology programmes
  • +Supportive academic environment and practical learning
  • +Positive student experience and sense of community
  • +Supportive and devoted lecturers
  • +Opportunities for innovation and career growth
  • +Positive campus environment and diverse student body
  • +Student-centered approach and preparedness for disruptions
  • +Engaging and practical academic programs with knowledgeable lecturers
  • +Welcoming and supportive learning environment for personal growth
  • +Practical learning and quality education in key programs
  • +Conducive, serene, and quiet learning environment
  • +Welcoming and helpful staff
  • +Empowering and supportive academic environment
  • +Personalized attention and approachable lecturers
  • +Strong focus on key disciplines for women
  • +Dedicated and committed lecturers
  • +Clear learning objectives and practical skill development
  • +Slow administrative processes

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Lack of faculty support and guidance.
  • -Repetitive or theoretical coursework.
  • -Issues with program management and limited career prospects.
  • -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant drawback.
  • -Course content is perceived as irrelevant or poorly delivered.
  • -Administrative and management issues
  • -Outdated facilities
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources negatively impact learning.
  • -Poor communication and unclear expectations lead to dissatisfaction.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause constant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Ineffective teaching and lack of student support are major concerns.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are frequently criticized.
  • -Poor communication and a lack of responsiveness from staff are common complaints.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution garners notable strengths in its **Location**, **Professors**, and **Value**, all receiving high marks. Student life and facilities are also well-regarded. The **Accomodation** category stands out as the weakest area, with a comparatively lower rating. Internationality is rated moderately well. Overall, the university presents a strong academic and environmental offering, with room for improvement in housing.

This institution receives particularly high marks for its **location** (4.71) and **value** (4.67), indicating these are key strengths. **Student life** also scores well at 4.53. The **facilities** (4.41), **professors** (4.39), and **accommodation** (4.31) are all rated positively. The area with the lowest score, though still respectable, is **internationality** (4.28).

This institution receives high marks across most surveyed areas, with "Value" being the strongest at 4.51. "Facilities" also score exceptionally well at 4.46. "Internationality" and "Professors" are also rated favorably. The weakest area identified is "Accomodation," receiving a score of 3.9. "Student Life" and "Location" fall within a similarly mid-range, solid performance.

This institution demonstrates significant strengths in its academic offerings and overall value, with particularly high ratings for Professors (4.2) and Value (4). Conversely, the university faces challenges in its Accommodation (2.75) and Internationality (2.8) scores, indicating areas for potential improvement to enhance the student experience. Other aspects like Facilities and Student Life are rated moderately.

This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in its facilities, professors, and value, all receiving outstanding scores. Student life and accommodation are also rated positively. However, the university's location receives a moderate rating, and its internationality is a noted area for improvement, scoring significantly lower than other categories.

This institution demonstrates considerable strengths in several key areas, with **Value** and **Location** receiving the highest scores at 4.25 and 4 respectively. Professors are also well-regarded, averaging a 4. While facilities and internationality are rated moderately, student life and accommodation represent the weakest aspects, with scores of 2.75 and 2.25, indicating areas for potential improvement.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4.38/5 based on 146 reviews, ~92% of students highlight strong academic programs and a supportive learning environment. A small minority (~2%) mentioned occasional administrative or faculty support challenges.

With an average rating of 4.78/5, approximately 100% of reviews are positive. Students praise brilliant, supportive lecturers and a great environment, though some mention limited resources like internet and computers, and the cold weather.

With an average rating of 4.46/5, ~97.6% of reviews are positive. Students praise student-centered approaches, prepared remote learning, engaging academics, and supportive lecturers. A small amount of negative feedback mentioned institutional influences.

With an average rating of 4.4/5, ~80% of reviews are positive. Students praise the quality education, practical learning, and dedicated faculty, especially in Agriculture, Education, and Business Studies. The serene learning environment and well-equipped facilities are also highlighted.

With 100% positive feedback and an average rating of 4/5, students praise Kiriri Women's University for its supportive and empowering academic environment. Lecturers are described as approachable and knowledgeable, fostering personalized attention and growth.

With an average rating of 4/5 from 4 reviews, ~75% are positive. Students praise opportunities for growth, skill development, and committed lecturers. Some noted slow registration processes and poor food quality, with limited options.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
52%
78%
61%
60%
0%
25%
0%
4★
36%
22%
29%
20%
100%
50%
0%
3★
10%
0%
7%
20%
0%
25%
0%
2★
2%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
2%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Hands-On and Practical Learning

Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology is one of the best universities in Kenya, as a personal opinion and one that is recommended nationally. I went there first because it was a few kilometres away from home and I wanted the experience of living alone and generally to feel like an adult. It was home away from home, that I even stayed one year later even after graduation. The lecturers were quite tough which was a good thing because I almost didn't graduate because I had missed a few classes. All my practical units that required extra coursework outside class always had the lecturers in attendance even when they didn't have to. My lecturers were very friendly and very practical on what the course I did would translate to once I finished. The security was very good especially for a single female young lady miles away from home. There was plenty of room to study, from parks all around the university, the student centre and the library. You could also easily access help from the administration and get to the staff offices for extra help from our lectures without going through loops. I loved it there and yes, I would recommend it to a family or friend, depending on the course they plan to do. I was an introvert in campus but I remember trying things like rollball, table tennis, pool, drama which are available and active even till date.

School as a flame of knowledge.

It is a good place to learn and fully explore your career. What I like is the commitment of the staff to make the school a better place. And what I dislike is the cold weather that makes school experience bad ,at times. I recommend that the school to have enough infrastructure for the well being of the students especially the lecture hall seats.

Servant Leadership

Daystar University gtaught me the importance of expressing myself and respectfully disagreeing with opinions that i djid not subscribe to. The university taught me that as much as i am leader i should not be afraid to be hands on on any given task in life and work space. A servant leader leads by example and does not instill fear to those he is leading.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close