London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE vs University of Greenwich - UoG vs Apsley Business School vs University of Cumbria vs Royal Docks Business School

Side-by-side comparison from 395 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Apsley Business School (5.00)
London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE: wins 0/6 categories
University of Greenwich - UoG: wins 0/6 categories
Apsley Business School: wins 6/6 categories
University of Cumbria: wins 0/6 categories
Royal Docks Business School: wins 0/6 categories
BMC Training: wins 0/6 categories
London Corporate Training: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Economics
London, The United Kingdom
4.40
Read more reviews
64 reviews
×
Best programme: Computer Science
London, The United Kingdom
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
3 reviews
×
Best programme: Business with Digital Marketing Management
Lancaster, The United Kingdom
4.50
Read more reviews
4 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting and Finance
London, The United Kingdom
3.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
London, The United Kingdom
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
London, The United Kingdom
4.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting and Economics
Category ratings
Facilities
4.04
4.25
4.67
Win
2.75
3.00
Not rated
3.00
Location
4.78
4.52
5.00
4.00
4.00
Not rated
5.00
Professors
4.26
4.34
5.00
Win
4.75
3.00
Not rated
4.00
Internationality
4.80
4.56
5.00
Win
3.75
4.00
Not rated
4.00
Student life
3.63
4.25
4.67
Win
3.25
3.00
Not rated
3.00
Value
4.04
4.23
5.00
Win
4.50
2.00
Not rated
4.00
Accommodation
3.78
3.82
5.00
Win
4.00
1.00
Not rated
3.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Expert and experienced faculty
  • +Supportive and collaborative community atmosphere
  • +Diverse and flexible learning and assessment methods
  • +Supportive and approachable faculty
  • +Welcoming and vibrant campus community
  • +Practical learning and real-world exposure
  • +Excellent professors and learning resources
  • +Well-structured programmes and timely delivery
  • +Good accommodation and supportive student environment
  • +Practical, career-focused programs and employability emphasis
  • +Supportive and motivating teaching staff
  • +Enjoyable study environment and facilities

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Helpful tutors and support staff
  • +Worthwhile and fun learning experience
Cons
  • -Poor teaching quality and lack of structure in academic programs.
  • -Inadequate support services and limited social opportunities.
  • -High fees with perceived low value and administrative issues.
  • -Poor organization and lecturer availability are significant problems.
  • -Disruptions from strikes negatively impacted the learning experience.
  • -The value for money is perceived as poor.
  • -Unresponsive administration and ineffective management.
  • -Insufficient and outdated campus facilities.
  • -Limited academic support and course offerings.
  • -Administrative & management issues cause frequent frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning experiences.
  • -Course content and teaching quality often fall short of expectations.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause constant frustration.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities create a difficult learning environment.
  • -Course content is often irrelevant or not current with industry standards.
Rating summary
What students say

Perceived strengths of this institution lie significantly in its **Location** and **Internationality**, both receiving top marks. Conversely, **Student Life** emerges as the area with the lowest reported satisfaction. Ratings for Facilities, Professors, Accomodation, and Value fall within a moderate to good range, indicating generally positive feedback across these aspects.

Overall, the university garners positive feedback, with **Internationality** and **Location** emerging as its strongest attributes, both receiving ratings above 4.5. **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a significantly lower score. Ratings for Facilities, Professors, Student Life, and Value are consistently strong, generally falling within the 4.2 to 4.3 range, indicating a well-rounded experience.

This institution garners exceptional marks, achieving a perfect score in **Professors, Location, Accomodation, Internationality, and Value**. The university also boasts high ratings for **Facilities and Student Life**, both scoring a commendable 4.67. While no areas fall below excellent, **Facilities and Student Life** represent the relative points of emphasis for potential improvement.

With a standout score for professors, this institution clearly excels in academic instruction. Conversely, facilities present the lowest-rated aspect. Other areas like location and accommodation are well-regarded, suggesting a generally positive student experience, though student life scores are moderate. Internationality and value also receive favorable marks.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This institution garners excellent scores for its location and a strong showing in professor quality and international student experience. However, areas such as facilities, student life, and accommodation received more moderate ratings, indicating potential for improvement in these aspects. Overall, it presents a compelling offering, particularly for those prioritizing geographical advantages and academic instruction.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Most reviews (~74%) are positive, praising academic reputation, expert faculty, and excellent resources. A small percentage (~3.4%) express dissatisfaction with lecturing quality, course structure, or career services.

With a 4.42 average rating from 64 reviews, ~87% of feedback is positive, highlighting supportive faculty, a vibrant community, and a beautiful campus. A small amount of negative feedback (~1.6%) noted organizational issues and lecturer inconsistency.

All 100% of feedback is positive, with a perfect 5/5 average rating. Students praise excellent professors, top-tier learning facilities, and well-furnished accommodation. The business-focused training and structured doctoral programs are also highlighted.

Most reviews are highly positive, rating the university 4.5/5. Students praise practical, career-focused programs, supportive staff, and appealing campuses. No negative feedback was recorded.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

The single review is positive, rating the university a 4/5. This feedback highlights worthwhile and fun experiences, with progress attributed to helpful tutors and support staff. Negative feedback is negligible.

Rating distribution
5★
34%
56%
100%
75%
0%
0%
0%
4★
44%
31%
0%
0%
0%
0%
100%
3★
19%
11%
0%
25%
100%
0%
0%
2★
2%
2%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Great Experience

LSE is a great place to create life-long connections and friends. There's a certain sense of community that is special to the university. The staff are hands-on and approachable. The facilities are modern and well-equipped.

Nothing to show

Timely delivered and well structured

I have gained a lot from my paper reviews, all courses and programme in general were delivered timely. The procedure on the path towards a doctoral degree is well structured and that was what I liked most. I would recommend ABS London especially for experienced executives looking for their career growth and personal development.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close