King's College London vs London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE vs University of Westminster vs Kingston University - KU vs University of West London

Side-by-side comparison from 790 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: University of West London (4.40)
King's College London: wins 1/7 categories
London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE: wins 1/7 categories
University of Westminster: wins 0/7 categories
Kingston University - KU: wins 0/7 categories
University of West London: wins 5/7 categories
London Business Training and Consulting: wins 0/7 categories
AMOS Sport Business School: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
London, The United Kingdom
4.20
Read more reviews
235 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Management
Best programme: Economics
London, The United Kingdom
4.30
Read more reviews
104 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Management
London, The United Kingdom
4.20
Read more reviews
78 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Management and Marketing
London, The United Kingdom
4.40
Top
Read more reviews
51 reviews
×
Best programme: Artificial Intelligence
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Aix en Provence, France
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
4.29
4.04
4.10
4.14
4.47
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Location
4.81
Win
4.78
4.37
4.05
4.48
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
4.16
4.26
4.17
4.09
4.48
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
4.62
4.80
Win
4.29
4.30
4.49
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
4.06
3.63
3.85
3.89
4.25
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Value
3.99
4.04
4.07
4.06
4.35
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
3.54
3.78
3.64
3.61
3.93
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Supportive professors and engaging, relevant courses
  • +Diverse international community and vibrant student life
  • +Strong academic reputation and central London location
  • +Expert and experienced faculty
  • +Supportive and collaborative community atmosphere
  • +Diverse and flexible learning and assessment methods
  • +Supportive and approachable faculty
  • +Vibrant, diverse, and engaging campus environment
  • +Practical and career-focused academic programs
  • +Knowledgeable, approachable faculty and relevant, practical course content
  • +Supportive transition and inclusive campus environment with growth opportunities
  • +Good quality teaching and accessible location with city connections
  • +Industry connections and career opportunities
  • +Engaging and relevant curriculum
  • +Supportive staff and positive campus environment

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues plague the student experience.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of essential resources are a significant concern.
  • -The high cost of tuition is not reflected in the quality of education or facilities.
  • -Poor teaching quality and lack of structure in academic programs.
  • -Inadequate support services and limited social opportunities.
  • -High fees with perceived low value and administrative issues.
  • -Poor teaching quality and lack of lecturer engagement.
  • -Ineffective communication regarding coursework and feedback.
  • -Disappointing course structure and administrative issues.
  • -Administrative and management issues, including disorganization and a lack of student support.
  • -Inexperienced or uncaring faculty and a scattered course structure.
  • -Lack of resources impacting the learning experience.
  • -Administrative and management issues create frequent problems.
  • -Facilities are outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Course content is irrelevant or outdated.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution receives excellent marks for its **location**, scoring a notable 4.81. Internationality is also a strong suit, with a rating of 4.62. Conversely, **accommodation** is identified as the weakest area, receiving the lowest score at 3.54. Other categories, including facilities, professors, student life, and value, fall within a generally positive range, indicating a well-rounded, though not uniformly outstanding, university experience.

Perceived strengths of this institution lie significantly in its **Location** and **Internationality**, both receiving top marks. Conversely, **Student Life** emerges as the area with the lowest reported satisfaction. Ratings for Facilities, Professors, Accomodation, and Value fall within a moderate to good range, indicating generally positive feedback across these aspects.

This institution demonstrates strong performance in its Location (4.37) and Internationality (4.29), indicating a well-situated campus with a global outlook. While Facilities (4.09), Professors (4.17), and Value (4.07) also receive positive marks, Student Life (3.85) and Accomodation (3.64) represent areas where scores are comparatively lower.

This university receives commendation across several metrics, with **Internationality** standing out as its strongest area at 4.30. Facilities and Value also score well, both above 4.0. Conversely, **Accomodation** is the lowest-rated aspect at 3.61, indicating room for improvement in this category. Student Life and Location also present solid, though not top-tier, scores.

This university demonstrates strong performance in several key areas, with exceptionally high marks for Internationality (4.49) and Professors (4.48). Facilities and Location also received very favorable scores. Student Life and Value are well-regarded, though Accomodation presents as the weakest area with a rating of 3.93.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a 4.16/5 average rating, ~99.6% of 236 reviews are positive, highlighting supportive professors, interesting courses, strong practical application, and vibrant student life. A single negative review mentioned campus locations and international student draw.

Most reviews (~74%) are positive, praising academic reputation, expert faculty, and excellent resources. A small percentage (~3.4%) express dissatisfaction with lecturing quality, course structure, or career services.

The University of Westminster receives overwhelmingly positive reviews (~92% of 104), highlighting diverse campuses, approachable faculty, and engaging student life. A small percentage of feedback (~2%) mentions concerns with course structure and lecturer communication.

~79% of reviews are positive, highlighting knowledgeable faculty, relevant courses, and good facilities. A small percentage (~2.5%) express concerns about management, resources, and disorganized student activities.

With a 4.45/5 average rating from 51 reviews, ~88% of feedback is positive. Students frequently praise the great experiences, strong industry connections leading to job placements, relevant curriculum, and supportive staff. No negative feedback was recorded.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
33%
34%
42%
40%
57%
0%
0%
4★
51%
44%
46%
42%
31%
0%
0%
3★
16%
19%
10%
17%
12%
0%
0%
2★
0%
2%
1%
3%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
1%
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Life changing experience.

A top-ranking university. Best faculty/ staff and professors. I have gained tremendous amount of knowledge and skills during my 1 year master's program. As a result, I have grown academically, professionally and personally.

Great Experience

LSE is a great place to create life-long connections and friends. There's a certain sense of community that is special to the university. The staff are hands-on and approachable. The facilities are modern and well-equipped.

International experience

During my first year at the university of Westminster I was able to come to three conclusions. The first one is that the university is a great place to connect to people from all around the world, is it also a great place to find friends and teachers that help you find yourself. Second conclusion is that it is not always so fun and beautiful, it is a hard path, where you learn how to be responsible, and that every action that you take for your future has a consequence. It is also a great place to learn from your mistakes and become a better person, you get in contact with different people that teach you many things. Third conclusion is that it is a very cozy place, I love my university because it has a nice and cozy vibe, it is a modern building but inside is very nice. I love how the institution tries to make its students feel comfortable inside.

Human Geography

The course and it's syllabus can be super interesting and fun but most of the lecturers are trash. They show no enthusiasm to teach and deliver lectures as if they were eulogies. Which is a shame, I feel the only thing holding back KU is the lack of enthusiasm.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close