EADA Business School vs EU Business School vs OBS Business School vs UIC Barcelona vs allWomen
Side-by-side comparison from 401 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practical, case-based learning and modern methodologies.
- +Strong international community and networking opportunities.
- +Expert faculty and diverse, relevant subject matter.
- +Practical, real-world business education
- +Diverse, international student community
- +Opportunities for networking and career development
- +Strong business programs with real-world application
- +Engaging professors and challenging coursework
- +Networking opportunities and appealing study location
- +Excellent academic programs and knowledgeable, kind professors.
- +Supportive and collaborative student atmosphere.
- +Strong preparation for career success and international outlook.
- +Engaging and supportive instructors
- +Practical and relevant course content
- +Strong community and peer support
- +Practical, hands-on learning with immediate application
- +Experienced, professional instructors with industry expertise
- +Engaging hybrid learning format
- +Supportive & engaged professors, humanistic & diverse environment
- +Practical learning, real-world application, and engaging classes
- +Accessible (affordable, online, evening classes) and helpful support
- -Administrative and communication issues lead to poor planning and rigidity.
- -Lack of practical application or emphasis on promised program features.
- -Arbitrary grading and inflexible academic structures.
- -Disorganization and administrative issues are prevalent.
- -Educational quality, staff helpfulness, and facilities are subpar.
- -The institution prioritizes profit over genuine educational support and accreditation.
- -Lack of qualified teachers and poor educational quality
- -Perceived as a for-profit institution rather than a school
- -Ineffective learning environment and useless forum structure
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
- -Lack of support and indifferent attitude from staff create a negative experience.
- -Administrative & management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequently criticized.
- -Lack of effective communication and support is a recurring problem.
- -Administrative and management issues.
- -Perceived lack of value for money.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a common complaint.
- -Lack of clear communication and support is prevalent.
This university receives excellent marks across most areas. Its strongest area is undeniably **Location**, achieving a near-perfect score. **Student Life**, **Professors**, and **Facilities** are also highly rated, reflecting positive experiences in these key aspects. **Internationality** is another standout, indicating a globally diverse environment. The primary area for improvement seems to be **Accomodation**, which, while still good, is the lowest-scoring category. **Value** also presents a solid, though not exceptional, rating.
This university shows particularly strong performance in its location and internationality, both receiving high scores. Student life and facilities also stand out positively. However, accommodation appears to be the weakest area, scoring notably lower than other aspects. The value and professor ratings fall in the mid-range, indicating solid but not exceptional performance in these categories.
This institution presents a largely consistent performance across several key areas. Facilities, professors, location, accommodation, and internationality all received a solid 2.5 rating, indicating a generally positive experience. The strongest aspect appears to be value, scoring a 3. Conversely, student life is the weakest area, rated at 2, suggesting room for improvement in that regard.
The university demonstrates particular strengths in its academic offerings, with **Professors** receiving a high rating of 4.27. **Facilities** are also well-regarded at 4.09. Areas for improvement are evident in **Accomodation**, which scored lowest at 3.33. Other aspects like Location, Student Life, Internationality, and Value are rated moderately.
With high marks across the board, this university excels in faculty expertise, earning a near-perfect 4.67. Its location and accommodation are also well-regarded at 4.38. Student life, though strong at 4.22, represents the lowest-rated category in this assessment. Internationality and value for money are notably strong, both receiving 4.44.
With exceptional marks in Facilities and Location, this institution clearly excels in its physical environment and accessibility. Student Life also receives top scores, suggesting a vibrant campus experience. Conversely, the university's weakest areas lie in its Professors and Internationality, both rated a moderate three. Value also sits at this mid-tier rating, indicating areas for potential improvement.
This institution excels in several key areas, receiving perfect scores for its professors, location, student life, and internationality. Its value proposition is also very strong. However, accommodation presents the most significant weakness, rated considerably lower. Facilities also received a middling score.
With an average rating of 4.49/5, ~98% of reviews are positive, praising practical, tech-sector focused, and international programs with excellent professors. A small amount of negative feedback (~2%) mentions issues with course scheduling and limited focus on specific program areas.
~74% of reviews are positive, highlighting practical learning and networking. Approximately 8% are negative, citing disorganization, basic education, and unhelpful staff.
Most reviews are positive, highlighting good educational foundations and opportunities. However, about 33.3% of feedback is negative, citing issues with teaching quality and program recognition.
With an average rating of 4.21/5, approximately 86% of reviews are positive, praising the collaborative atmosphere, quality programs, and accessible location. One review (around 7%) cites issues with indifferent administration.
Reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~100% of feedback recommending the program. Students highlight great teachers, practical course content, and a supportive, diverse community as key strengths. There are no negative reviews.
With an average rating of 3/5, feedback is evenly split, with ~50% positive and ~50% negative. Positive comments highlight practical, hands-on learning and professional instructors. Negative reviews express dissatisfaction with program value and staff.
All reviews are positive, highlighting helpful professors, a humanistic and diverse approach, and a practical, affordable learning experience. The average rating is 4.67 out of 5.
International Immersion: Transformative Leadership for Future Challenges – Program Review I had the opportunity to participate in the International Immersion program at EADA Business School, Barcelona, spending a month at the Barcelona campus and an additional week at the Collbató campus. The overall experience was highly enriching and impactful. The classroom sessions at the Barcelona campus were exceptionally interactive and engaging. The learning environment encouraged open dialogue, collaborative thinking, and the exchange of diverse perspectives among participants from different backgrounds. This significantly enhanced the depth of discussions and contributed to a well-rounded learning experience. The Collbató campus offered a distinctly immersive environment, combining experiential learning with outdoor activities. This setting complemented the academic sessions by fostering teamwork, reflection, and leadership development in a more informal yet highly effective context. Overall, the program was a valuable learning journey. While the immediate experience was positive, its true impact has become more evident over time. It has contributed meaningfully to my personal and professional development, particularly in enhancing my leadership perspective, cross-cultural understanding, and ability to navigate complex, real-world challenges.
Although I earned my bachelor degree at the University of York in UK, it was quite theoretical. I really started to bridge the learning gap between theory and practice only when I started to pursue my master degree in Business Analytics and Data Science at EU Business School in Barcelona. What stands out most in my current program is the university’s strong emphasis on practical experience. Our professors are not only scholars but also are successful business managers and data experts, as they are either the owners of successful organizations or individuals who took on top management roles in large corporations. Their teachings are more than just the syllabus in, they also provide personal experience in the area of niche markets, provide best practices in an industry, and always provoke our thinking with regard to the existing trends in higher education, business strategy, and innovation.
It's embarrassing that they call themselves a school. They're a company that wants to take your money without providing any education nor a recognized degree. The "teachers" are businessmen without any teaching qualification and without the know-how, the classes were boring and the forum structure is pointless. Save yourself and study somewhere else!
Classes are good, I would try to make them more interactive and with more practices in class. Professors normally are good, in the english course I believe the english of the teachers could be better specially if the course is taught in that language. I also believe professors could interact more with their students and try to get in contact with students they see may be struggling. Otherwise the campus, although a bit small is fine, really nice, the library could be a little bigger.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
