Central European University - CEU vs University of Szeged vs ESSCA School of Management vs Corvinus Business School vs University of Pécs

Side-by-side comparison from 118 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Central European University - CEU: wins 0/7 categories
University of Szeged: wins 0/7 categories
ESSCA School of Management: wins 0/7 categories
Corvinus Business School: wins 4/7 categories
University of Pécs: wins 0/7 categories
University of Miskolc: wins 1/7 categories
University of Pécs Faculty of Business and Economics: wins 2/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Philosophy
Szeged, Hungary
4.40
Read more reviews
18 reviews
×
Best programme: Agricultural Engineering
Best programme: International Business
Best programme: Business Management
Best programme: Psychology
Miskolc, Hungary
4.50
Read more reviews
11 reviews
×
Best programme: Environmental Engineering
Best programme: MSc Management & Leadership
Category ratings
Facilities
3.56
4.00
3.57
3.00
4.18
4.18
4.36
Win
Location
3.44
4.25
3.71
5.00
Win
4.44
4.45
4.57
Professors
4.22
4.33
4.14
4.00
4.14
4.27
4.36
Win
Internationality
4.78
4.22
4.29
5.00
Win
4.53
4.27
4.64
Student life
4.00
4.44
4.14
5.00
Win
4.44
4.27
3.80
Value
3.78
4.17
4.00
5.00
Win
4.26
4.09
4.50
Accommodation
3.75
3.78
2.86
3.00
4.19
4.36
Win
4.21
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Diverse student body and international perspective
  • +High academic rigor and intellectual stimulation
  • +Expert faculty and dedicated mentorship
  • +Excellent and supportive faculty and staff
  • +Diverse and well-structured academic programs
  • +Welcoming and advantageous environment for students
  • +Strong international focus and diverse programs
  • +Excellent networking opportunities and alumni network
  • +Engaging learning environment and helpful professors
  • +Challenging and skill-enriching academic environment
  • +Positive overall experience despite external factors
  • +Supportive scholarship opportunities
  • +Practical and theoretical course balance
  • +Approachable, experienced faculty
  • +Supportive, multicultural community
  • +Innovative learning environment and supportive community
  • +Internationalization and cultural diversity
  • +Accomplished faculty and top-notch facilities
  • +Practical, up-to-date curriculum with real-world focus
  • +Affordable, international study environment
  • +Welcoming city with good social opportunities
Cons
  • -Rigid academic structure and lack of intellectual engagement.
  • -Insufficient financial aid and rising tuition fees.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources hinder learning.
  • -Limited opportunities for practical experience and insufficient career support are major drawbacks.
  • -Irrelevant courses and unqualified instructors are a common complaint.
  • -The high cost of tuition for subpar offerings is a significant detractor.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a constant source of frustration.
  • -Facilities are often outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Course content and teaching methods are frequently seen as unengaging and irrelevant.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment create a poor learning environment.
  • -Excessive administrative burdens and inefficient management cause frustration.
  • -Lack of accessible and timely support exacerbates student difficulties.
  • -Administrative and management issues create significant problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
  • -Lack of adequate support and communication leaves students feeling unsupported.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant and poorly delivered.
Rating summary
What students say

Internationality stands out as the strongest area, achieving an impressive rating. Conversely, facilities present the weakest aspect, with a score of 3.56. Other areas like professors and student life received strong marks, while location, accommodation, and value also scored positively, indicating a generally well-regarded institution with distinct strengths and some room for improvement in its physical infrastructure.

This institution demonstrates a strong performance across multiple aspects, with student life and professors receiving particularly high marks. While facilities and accommodation are rated well, they represent the areas with room for improvement compared to other categories. The university also scores favorably in location, internationality, and value.

This university's strengths lie significantly in its **Internationality**, rated at 4.29, and **Student Life** and **Professors**, both scoring a high 4.14. However, **Accomodation** emerges as the weakest area, with a considerably lower rating of 2.86. Other aspects like Facilities (3.57), Location (3.71), and Value (4) fall within a moderate to good range.

This institution garners exceptional marks for its **location, student life, internationality, and overall value**, all receiving perfect scores. The quality of its **professors** is also highly praised. However, areas for improvement are evident in **facilities and accommodation**, which received lower, albeit still adequate, ratings.

This institution garners excellent marks in key areas, with Internationality standing out at 4.53, closely followed by Location (4.44) and Student Life (4.44). Value for money is also highly rated at 4.26. While Facilities and Accommodations also score well (around 4.18), Professors received slightly lower, though still strong, feedback at 4.14.

This institution garners strong marks across several aspects. Location stands out as the highest-rated area, followed closely by accommodation. Professors and student life also received commendable scores. While facilities and internationality performed well, the value proposition emerged as the lowest-rated category. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded profile with a particular strength in its physical setting and living arrangements.

This university garners high marks in several key areas, with Internationality and Location being particularly strong at 4.64 and 4.57 respectively. Facilities, Professors, and Value also receive excellent scores, all above 4.35. Accommodations are rated well at 4.21. Student Life, however, is the weakest area with a rating of 3.8.

Reviews summary
Highlights

~70% of reviews are positive, highlighting diversity, teaching methods, and faculty expertise. ~20% of feedback is negative, citing rigid academic structure and a lack of critical engagement.

University of Szeged receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~83% of reviews being highly positive (4-5 stars). Students appreciate the wide range of faculties, great library, and scholarship opportunities. Teaching methodologies and supportive professors are frequently praised.

~86% of reviews are positive, highlighting international exposure, networking, and good professors. Some negative feedback (~14%) mentioned irrelevant courses and teachers.

This university receives very positive feedback, with ~100% of reviews being 4-5 stars. Students highlight the nourishing of skills and a competitive yet positive environment. Accommodation costs are noted as high.

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~91%), highlighting a strong academic foundation with a practical and theoretical balance. Professors are praised for fairness, real-world experience, and approachability, creating a dynamic learning environment. Limited on-campus job opportunities were a minor concern.

The University of Miskolc receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~91% of reviews being highly favorable. Students praise cutting-edge labs, approachable professors, a supportive community, and internationalization. No negative feedback was noted.

~93% of reviews are positive, highlighting practical, up-to-date curricula and hands-on learning. Negative feedback, representing ~0%, was not provided.

Rating distribution
5★
30%
56%
29%
0%
44%
55%
57%
4★
40%
28%
43%
100%
47%
36%
36%
3★
10%
17%
14%
0%
9%
9%
7%
2★
10%
0%
14%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
10%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Engaging

ESSCA School of Management is known for its international approach and diverse programs. In my opinion, many students appreciate its emphasis on experiential learning and the opportunities for international exposure through exchange programs and internships. However, some may find the workload demanding and challenging but that's the way it operates. Whether I recommend it would depend on your specific academic and career goals, as well as your preferences for learning style and environment. Likes/ Dislikes: *Essca provides enormous opportunities to improve and enhance your skill. *Diversified culture *Provides webinars and seminars across all the campuses. *Workload Management could be seen as an disadvantage. As sometimes, you may find it very challenging.

Nothing to show

Practical Hours/ Language Barrier

My honest opinion of PECS University has evolved significantly over the years. When I first started, I faced numerous challenges, including language barriers, a lack of lecturers who spoke English, and insufficient support for learning Hungarian, especially in my department. However, Pécs listened to our complaints and made strides to improve the situation. If someone had asked me whether I would recommend Pécs while I was still there, I would have said no. However, based on what I see now, I truly believe the improvements are worth giving it a chance. The university has enhanced its resources, offered more diverse course options, and fostered a more inclusive environment. It's also important to mention that Pécs is such a peaceful and serene city, which adds to the overall experience of studying there. If the opportunity arises for me to return for a master's degree, I would certainly consider it, as I believe the university is now better equipped to support its students' success. Overall, I appreciate PECS University's progress and look forward to seeing it grow.

Nothing to show

Modern, practical and worth It

My experience with the Business Development Master’s program has been really great overall. It offers high-quality education with practical knowledge. The courses are well-structured. The program has been renewed and designed to match current business trends, not just old-school textbook knowledge. We worked on a bunch of case studies, group projects, and presentations. We also experienced real business scenarios in every semester from subjects like Project Management, Tutorial: Startup Lab, Marketing Analysis and Planning, ESG, etc. Another important factor is affordability. Compared to many other master’s programs in Europe, this one gives really good value for money. You’re getting a strong education, experienced lecturers, and a modern curriculum, without the crazy tuition fees you’d expect elsewhere. The programme also feels fresh and up-to-date. Topics like innovation, strategy, and business development are approached in a way that reflects what’s actually happening in the business world today. The atmosphere is great. The community is diverse, and working with people from different backgrounds adds a lot to the experience. Plus you can meet different cultures and get new friends from all around the World. Also the study department is a huge help for every student. I used to be a Student Representative and working with the staff was easy, because they supported and informed us constantly. Overall, I’d say the Business Development Master’s at PTE KTK is a great choice if you’re looking for something modern, practical, and affordable, without sacrificing quality.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close