Sciences Po vs Université du Havre vs emlyon business school vs ONCAMPUS Global vs EM Normandie - EM Normandie
Side-by-side comparison from 190 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Interdisciplinary curriculum with practical applications
- +Networking opportunities and vibrant student life
- +Prestigious institution with accomplished faculty
- +High-quality programs & professors
- +Diverse student body & exchange opportunities
- +Excellent facilities & location
- +Practical, international, and balanced academic/professional programs.
- +Diverse student body and global environment.
- +Ample opportunities for personal and professional development.
- +Supportive and approachable lecturers
- +Well-organized courses and learning resources
- +Personal and academic development
- +Connecting theory to practice through real-world cases.
- +Diverse international environment and global opportunities.
- +Relevant industry-focused courses and knowledgeable faculty.
- +Expert professors with real-world experience
- +Practical, industry-focused curriculum
- +Diverse international student community
- +Industry-active instructors and professional preparation
- +Supportive and welcoming atmosphere
- +Emphasis on practical, project-based learning
- -Administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities and academic methods.
- -Poor teaching quality and lack of preparation.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are a problem.
- -Communication from instructors and the institution is poor.
- -Learning was perceived as lacking depth and practical value.
- -Frustrating and unfair grading systems, especially for group work, were common complaints.
- -Program management and communication were seen as inadequate.
- -Administrative and management issues are frequently cited as a source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are a common complaint.
- -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant or poorly delivered.
- -Perceived as a money-making scheme with mediocre teaching.
- -Lack of skill development and career readiness.
- -Unqualified speakers and insufficient academic enrichment.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Facilities are frequently described as outdated and in poor condition.
- -Teaching quality and curriculum relevance are inconsistent and often disappointing.
Internationality and location stand out as the university's strongest attributes, receiving exceptional ratings. Conversely, accommodation presents the weakest area, scoring significantly lower than other categories. Professors, student life, and value are all rated positively, indicating a well-rounded experience, though facilities fall in the middle ground.
This institution garners excellent marks in several key areas. Facilities, professors, and location all received perfect scores, indicating exceptional quality in these aspects. Student life, internationality, and value for money are also strong, each rated a solid four. The weakest area identified is accommodation, scoring a three.
This institution performs exceptionally well in several key areas. Its location and internationality are standout features, receiving the highest scores. Student life and value are also strong points, indicating a positive overall experience. The weakest area appears to be accommodation, which, while still rated moderately, falls below other categories. Facilities and professors also received solid, though not exceptional, scores.
Overall, this institution garners favorable reviews across multiple aspects. The highest-rated areas are Professors (4.75) and Location (4.73), indicating significant strengths in these domains. Conversely, Facilities (4.3) and Accomodation (4.27) received the lowest scores, suggesting these might be areas for potential improvement. Student Life and Internationality also scored highly.
This institution performs well across most aspects, with **Internationality** standing out as its strongest area. Facilities, Professors, and Value also receive high marks. Areas for potential improvement include **Location**, which scored the lowest, and Accomodation. Student life and the overall value proposition are rated solidly in the mid-to-high range.
Overall, this university garners favorable ratings in key areas. Internationality stands out with the highest score. However, accommodation received the lowest rating, suggesting a potential area for improvement. Other categories, including professors and student life, also scored highly.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in its **Value** (4.67) and **Facilities** (4.47), indicating high satisfaction in these key areas. **Accomodation** (4.33) and **Student Life** (4.20) also received positive scores. However, the university's **Location** (3.13) stands out as a comparatively weaker aspect, with **Internationality** (3.87) also receiving a moderate rating.
Around 96% of reviews are positive, highlighting interdisciplinary education, strong academics, and vibrant student life. A small percentage (~4%) express concerns about teaching methods and academic staff preparation.
With a 4/5 average rating, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students praise the diverse lecture programs, proximity of a large library, and recommend the International Business Management courses and professor quality.
Approximately 98% of reviews are positive, praising the academic rigor, practical focus, international environment, and career support. A small amount of feedback noted disappointing learning experiences and unfair grading.
Reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%), highlighting excellent teaching, supportive staff, and well-organized courses that improve language and academic skills. Minor scheduling changes were the only noted inconvenience.
Most reviews (approximately 71%) highlight a positive learning atmosphere, inspiring professors, and valuable international experiences. A small amount of feedback (around 14%) suggests mediocrity and a focus on profit. The average rating is 3.86/5.
Reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~98.3%), with students highlighting academic excellence, practical industry focus, and supportive, knowledgeable professors. A small minority (~1.7%) reported a lack of career readiness or qualified speakers.
With a 4.4/5 average rating from 15 reviews, ~93% are positive. Students praise quality teaching from industry professionals and a supportive, welcoming atmosphere. The heavy workload and project-focused curriculum prepare them well for professional careers.
I'm an exchange student in the Reims campus in the academic year of 2023-2024. I think this campus is good for an exchange experience because there are a lot of exchange students and even the french people who come to the grad school don't live in Reims, so basically everyone on the campus is new to the city and wants to form a bond. In terms of academic experience, I think Sciences Po system is really controlling. Their attendance policy is really strict and all the classes have an assignment for the week, either a presentation or an evaluation, which makes the semester exhausting since the beginning. Also, I didn't like the fact that in some classes there are only presentations made by students and no later explanation by the professor. I don't like this method because I think the students only focus on preparing their presentation and we don't really pay attention to the presentation of the other classmates as much as we would pay as if the professor was presenting. To summarize, I still love some of my classes, but I had higher expectations about Sciences Po's method, since it's the best political sciences university in Europe, which made me a little disappointed.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I had an amazing experience at ESC Clermont Business School. As a school founded in 1919, it has more than 100 years of history and a strong reputation for academic excellence. It perfectly combines tradition with modern teaching methods and innovative business education. The professors are knowledgeable, approachable, and always willing to support students both academically and professionally. The courses are practical, industry-focused, and designed to prepare students for today's global business environment, making the school competitive with many of the top business schools in France. One of the things I appreciated most was the location. Clermont-Ferrand is a beautiful, safe, and welcoming city that offers a great quality of life for students. The school truly values its international community, creating an inclusive environment where students from different cultures feel comfortable and supported from day one. What makes the experience even more special is the local community. The people in Clermont are friendly and welcoming, making it easy for international students to integrate, build friendships, and experience French culture beyond the classroom. I highly recommend ESC Clermont Business School to anyone looking for a high-quality business education, excellent faculty, a diverse international environment, and a supportive community. It is a place where you can grow academically, professionally, and personally.
Nothing to show
