Universidad Autónoma de Colombia - FUAC vs Falmouth University vs BI Norwegian Business School - BI vs University of Bergen vs Warsaw University of Life Sciences - SGGW

Side-by-side comparison from 71 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Western Norway University of Applied Sciences (4.50)
Universidad Autónoma de Colombia - FUAC: wins 0/7 categories
Falmouth University: wins 0/7 categories
BI Norwegian Business School - BI: wins 3/7 categories
University of Bergen: wins 1/7 categories
Warsaw University of Life Sciences - SGGW: wins 0/7 categories
NHH Norwegian School of Economics: wins 1/7 categories
Western Norway University of Applied Sciences: wins 2/7 categories
Comparing
Falmouth, The United Kingdom
4.20
Read more reviews
46 reviews
×
Best programme: Theatre Arts
Best programme: B.Sc. in International Business Administration
Best programme: Biomedical Sciences
Best programme: School of Business/Management
Best programme: Economics and Finance
Best programme: Engineering
Category ratings
Facilities
Not rated
4.24
5.00
Win
4.00
4.25
4.71
3.50
Location
Not rated
4.00
5.00
Win
4.33
4.14
4.14
3.00
Professors
Not rated
4.20
4.00
3.86
4.13
4.43
4.50
Win
Internationality
Not rated
4.07
5.00
Win
4.00
4.25
4.43
4.50
Student life
Not rated
4.18
4.00
4.43
Win
3.75
4.29
3.50
Value
Not rated
4.07
3.00
4.14
4.13
4.14
4.50
Win
Accommodation
Not rated
3.76
2.00
4.00
4.00
4.71
Win
3.50
Pros & Cons
Pros

Nothing to show

  • +Hands-on experience and industry opportunities
  • +Supportive faculty and accessible help
  • +Flexible course structure and modern facilities
  • +Strong industry connections and practical business education
  • +International environment and balanced daily life
  • +Excellent and varied food options
  • +Excellent academic programs and knowledgeable professors
  • +Strong student support services and welfare provisions
  • +Vibrant international community and city-integrated campus life
  • +Beautiful, green campus and modern facilities.
  • +Practical, hands-on learning and experienced, helpful lecturers.
  • +Good value, reasonable tuition, and available scholarships.
  • +Free tuition and diverse program options
  • +High quality education and international exchange opportunities
  • +Supportive environment and welcoming community
  • +Flexible online format and structure
  • +Career-focused and practical learning
  • +Supportive instructors and engaging lectures
Cons

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are consistently criticized.
  • -Course content is often perceived as irrelevant or poorly delivered.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and lack of student support are common complaints.
  • -Outdated or problematic lecture streaming software hinders communication with instructors.
  • -Administrative and management issues create a frustrating student experience.
  • -Lack of specialized knowledge in the field of study.
  • -Limited practical application and authority in the field.
  • -Perceived inefficiency of the program's time commitment.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a recurring concern.
  • -Poor teaching quality and curriculum relevance are often criticized.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause confusion and frustration.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support creates a negative student experience.
Rating summary
What students say

Nothing to show

This institution demonstrates a strong showing in key areas, with **Facilities** receiving the highest rating at 4.24. **Professors** and **Student Life** also score well, both exceeding 4.1. Notably, **Accomodation** emerges as the area with the lowest rating, registering at 3.76. Other aspects like Location, Internationality, and Value are all rated solidly around the 4.0 mark.

Impressive scores characterize this institution, particularly in its **facilities**, **location**, and **internationality**, all receiving perfect marks. Student experience is further bolstered by a commendable **student life** and a strong **professor** evaluation. However, **accommodation** presents a notable weakness with a score of 2, and the **value** proposition sits in the middle with a rating of 3.

This institution demonstrates excellent performance, with student life and location receiving the highest marks at approximately 4.43 and 4.33 respectively. Facilities, accommodation, and internationality are all rated a solid 4. Professors represent the weakest area, scoring 3.86. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded experience, with particular strengths in its vibrant student community and convenient setting.

Review of the institution reveals strong performance in several key areas. Facilities and Internationality both earned an excellent 4.25 rating. While Professors and Value were also highly regarded at 4.125, Student Life emerged as the comparatively weakest aspect with a rating of 3.75. Location and Accomodation also received solid scores.

This institution receives exceptionally high marks for its facilities and accommodation, both scoring an outstanding 4.7. Professors and internationality are also strong points, with ratings of 4.4. Student life and value for money are rated at 4.3 and 4.1 respectively. The university's location is its weakest area, though still a respectable 4.1.

This institution demonstrates significant strengths in **Professors** and **Internationality**, both receiving top scores of 4.5. **Value** also stands out at a high 4.5. Conversely, **Location** received the lowest rating at 3. The remaining areas of Facilities, Student Life, and Accommodation are rated solidly at 3.5, indicating a generally positive, though not exceptional, experience in these aspects.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Nothing to show

Nearly all of the 46 reviews are positive, highlighting supportive faculty and excellent facilities. Students appreciate the hands-on experience and opportunities offered, with no negative feedback recorded.

This university receives a strong average rating of 4/5, with approximately 100% of feedback being positive. Students highlight excellent industry connections, an international environment, and practical business education. The campus offers a balanced daily experience and diverse dining options.

With a 4.14/5 average, reviews are overwhelmingly positive, highlighting a good learning environment and student welfare services. A small percentage (~14.3%) of feedback mentioned issues with lecture streaming software.

Most reviews are positive (~75%), highlighting a beautiful campus, practical courses, and helpful lecturers. A small minority (~12.5%) found their field of study lacking practical expertise.

Reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~0% negative feedback. Students praise the free tuition and wide range of masters specializations, highlighting a conducive academic and diverse environment.

With an average rating of 4.5/5, student feedback is overwhelmingly positive. Reviews highlight convenience and structure in online formats, alongside supportive instructors and career-focused, practical learning.

Rating distribution
5★
0%
35%
0%
43%
50%
29%
50%
4★
0%
52%
100%
43%
25%
57%
50%
3★
0%
13%
0%
0%
13%
14%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
14%
13%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close