The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin - KUL vs Vincent Pol University - VPU vs Lublin University of Technology vs University of Economics and Innovation in Lublin - WSEI vs University of Life Sciences in Lublin - UP Lublin
Side-by-side comparison from 58 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Qualified and friendly staff/professors.
- +Wide range of programs and modern facilities.
- +International atmosphere and helpful environment.
- +Welcoming and supportive academic environment with approachable and knowledgeable faculty.
- +Diverse and international student body with accessible English-taught programs.
- +Practical learning opportunities and personalized attention in engaging discussions.
- +Excellent, knowledgeable, and passionate professors.
- +High-quality academic programs and innovative courses.
- +Well-equipped facilities and supportive services.
- +Approachable and supportive lecturers and staff
- +Emphasis on practical skills and real-world application
- +Welcoming and friendly university environment
- +Strong emphasis on practical learning and hands-on experience.
- +Professional and supportive faculty and a well-designed curriculum.
- +Positive campus environment including good accommodation and extracurriculars.
- +Professors' approachability
- +Program relevance and substance
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are significant drawbacks.
- -Lack of support for students' academic and personal needs is a concern.
- -Inconsistent curriculum and poor lecturer English proficiency hinder learning.
- -Difficulty in receiving promised refunds and poor communication from administration.
- -Lack of preparation for future careers due to teaching methods.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and lack of support from staff are prevalent complaints.
- -administrative & management issues
- -outdated facilities
- -lack of clear communication
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and student support is prevalent.
- -Lack of professor engagement and institutional support.
- -Uninspiring campus environment.
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates a particularly strong showing in Student Life, Internationality, and Value, all receiving excellent marks of 4.8. Facilities and Accomodation also score highly at 4.6. The area with the lowest rating, though still positive, is Professors, at 4.2. Location garners a solid 4.4. Overall, the feedback highlights impressive strengths in student experience and global engagement, with academics being the sole category receiving a less exceptional score.
The university garners solid marks across most areas, with Location standing out as a significant strength. Internationality and Professors also received favorable reviews. Conversely, Accomodation was rated the weakest, suggesting room for improvement in that specific aspect. Other categories like Facilities, Student Life, and Value received moderate scores.
This institution receives commendable ratings across several key areas, with its **Location** standing out as the strongest aspect, followed closely by **Student Life** and **Accommodation**. **Facilities** and **Professors** also score well. Areas for potential improvement, where ratings are less robust, include **Internationality** and **Value**.
This university garners impressive scores in several key areas, with **Location** being its strongest asset at 4.67 and **Facilities** also highly rated at 4.57. **Student Life** and **Professors** also received positive marks. However, **Accomodation** presents a significant challenge, with a considerably lower rating of 2.83, indicating this is the weakest aspect according to the provided data. **Internationality** and **Value** fall within a solid middle range.
This institution demonstrates significant strengths in its **Location**, earning a perfect score, and **Accommodations**, rated highly. **Facilities** also stand out with an excellent rating. **Student Life**, **Professors**, and **Internationality** all receive strong, consistent scores. The university also offers good **Value**. Overall, the ratings indicate a well-rounded experience with a particular emphasis on its prime location and living arrangements.
The university's location is its most significant strength, receiving a high rating of 4.4. Internationality also scores well at 3.8. Conversely, facilities and professors present areas for improvement, both scoring 2.8. Student life, accommodation, and value are rated moderately at 3.0, indicating a generally average performance in these aspects.
Nothing to show
Students praise the university's international atmosphere, fair prices, and friendly, helpful staff. Recurring themes include qualified professors, modern facilities, and a wide range of programs. Positive sentiment is ~83% with no negative feedback.
Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting knowledgeable lecturers, a welcoming and diverse environment, and good learning standards. A smaller portion of feedback (~12%) mentions issues with curriculum adherence, financial transparency, and lecturer communication.
Positive feedback (~83%) highlights knowledgeable and supportive professors, good academic programs, and well-equipped facilities. Some minor concerns exist regarding outdated equipment and syllabus improvements. No significant negative feedback was noted.
Students largely praise the university's welcoming environment and approachable, supportive lecturers, with a strong emphasis on practical application. Minor feedback suggests potential areas for improvement in sports facilities and clarification of explanations.
The University of Life Sciences garners strong positive feedback (~80%), with students highlighting high standards, practical learning, and supportive staff. No negative reviews were recorded.
With an average rating of 3.2/5, feedback suggests a mixed student experience. While ~80% of reviews are positive, some students report professors lacking engagement and insufficient learning support, alongside easy exams.
Nothing to show
I estimate the years spent at the Catholic University in Lublin positively. I believe that the university staff is helpful to students. The University is well located near the city center and has modern facilities.
I want to share our experience about studying at VPU. I hope this review will help somebody not to make a mistake. My daughter studied there from October 2023 to May 2024 – Beauty Science faculty, in English. She decided not to continue her studies at the University due to a number of reasons: 1. The curriculum is not followed. The semester classes indicated in it did not coincide with those taught in the daughter’s group. 2. Classes according to the plan were supposed to begin on October 9, 2023, the 1st lesson was held only on October 16. Only 3 classes per week were held from the 16th to the end of October. There were no classes at all during the first week of November. 3. We were promised that all classes specified in the program would be carried out in full. But actually, teachers were regularly late for classes and finished the classes ahead of schedule. The 3 or 4 hours stated in the schedule lasted 1.5 or 2 hours. 4. The medical examination for students wasn’t carried out in full, although practical classes with cosmetology procedures and manipulations were conducted. 5. The University offers only 1 educational institution under the Erasmus program for the Beauty science faculty. My daughter independently found and contacted a number of universities with similar programs. Five of them agreed to accept her under the Erasmus program, but this required entering into partnership agreements. She provided information to the Erasmus program coordinator at Vincent Pol University with contacts and correspondence. But even then, no agreement has been concluded with any of the universities. 6. Not a single experiment was carried out during practical classes in the subjects of perfumery and biochemistry, since there were no reagents. 7. Even though the University considers itself as practically oriented it’s not true. The beauty salons in Lublin don’t want to recruit students for practice. The University offers 2 salons which are ready to recruit students but it turns out that they just sign the documents to confirm the completion of the practice and don’t teach students anything. 8. The administration of the University promises to resolve the problems. But nothing changes. To sum up: the University is not interested in its students’ knowledge. If you just wish to buy a diploma – it’s the right place. If you are interested in getting knowledge, skills and experience – NOT.
Nothing to show
WSEI is a really friendly place to be, the staff are approachable and helpful. My unique experiences were learning about how to care for the sick in ways that I never knew existed such as making the patients feel comfortable and treating them like family since I am studying nursing. It made me feel more passionate and look forward to all my lectures.
Interesting place. If you are interested in "nature-related" studies, that shouldn't be a bad choice. I am from veterinary medicine and everything there is average: average teachers, average program, average methods. Of course, there are some motivated teachers, who will try to give you the most of them but is better to keep your expectations not too high. If you are highly motivated to "dig deep" it should be easier for you. Besides that, there is a very good student exchange program (Erasmus) so you can travel easily with a pretty good scholarship. Same if you want to come there as an Erasmus, you shouldn't be disappointed. Good location in the city center, the city is relatively cheap by itself which is great for students.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
