EU Business School vs Technical University of Dortmund - TU Dortmund vs South Westphalia University of Applied Sciences vs International School of Management (ISM) vs Forward College

Side-by-side comparison from 308 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
EU Business School: wins 0/5 categories
Technical University of Dortmund - TU Dortmund: wins 1/5 categories
South Westphalia University of Applied Sciences: wins 0/5 categories
International School of Management (ISM): wins 0/5 categories
Forward College: wins 0/5 categories
eufom Business School - eufom: wins 2/5 categories
NIT The Business School at the Hamburg University of Technology: wins 2/5 categories
Comparing
Barcelona, Spain
3.90
Read more reviews
251 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Administration
Best programme: Data Science
Best programme: Bachelor of Business Administration
Best programme: International Management
Paris, France
4.70
Read more reviews
33 reviews
×
Best programme: Business and Management
Best programme: International Business Management
Best programme: MBA In Technology Management
Category ratings
Facilities
4.04
5.00
Win
4.40
3.50
4.47
4.00
4.83
Location
4.73
4.14
4.40
3.50
4.83
5.00
Win
4.50
Professors
4.04
4.43
4.60
4.50
4.91
3.00
5.00
Win
Internationality
4.72
4.86
5.00
3.50
4.55
5.00
4.33
Student life
4.22
4.00
4.40
3.00
4.59
5.00
Win
4.67
Value
3.87
4.29
5.00
3.50
4.58
5.00
4.50
Accommodation
3.54
3.43
3.40
1.00
4.28
3.00
4.60
Win
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Helpful professors and career support
  • +Valuable practical and theoretical business knowledge
  • +Enriching overall student experience
  • +Supportive international environment and integration
  • +Strong academic programs with theory-practice balance
  • +Excellent facilities and resources for study and well-being
  • +Practical, hands-on curriculum and industry relevance
  • +Supportive and approachable faculty
  • +International environment and practical career preparation
  • +High-quality lectures and academic planning
  • +Diverse assessment methods
  • +Opportunities for holistic student development
  • +Welcoming and international community
  • +Engaging and interactive learning approach
  • +Opportunities for personal development
  • +Strong international business programs
  • +Positive semester abroad opportunities
  • +Integrated business and technology education for practical application.
  • +Small class sizes and personal lecturer/staff interaction.
  • +Strong focus on entrepreneurship and innovation.
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause disorganization and lack of support.
  • -Outdated facilities and a focus on attendance over quality education are criticized.
  • -The educational program is perceived as basic and unaccredited in some regions.
  • -Inadequate communication and administrative issues.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources.
  • -Limited course variety and inflexible academic policies.
  • -Students are dissatisfied with administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a recurring problem.
  • -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant and poorly delivered.
  • -Administrative and management issues are frequently cited as a source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources detract from the learning environment.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from faculty and staff is a recurring problem.
  • -Disorganized and unhelpful administrative and management processes.
  • -Outdated or poorly maintained facilities and equipment.
  • -Lack of clear communication and transparency regarding policies and decisions.
  • -Administrative & management issues disrupt student experience.
  • -Outdated facilities hinder learning and comfort.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support causes frustration.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a major source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are frequently criticized.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support from staff are recurring complaints.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution excels in several key areas, with Location and Internationality receiving the highest marks at 4.73. Student Life also scores well at 4.22. Conversely, Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, scoring 3.42, suggesting room for improvement. Facilities and Professors are rated consistently around 4.04, while Value sits at a respectable 3.87.

This institution demonstrates considerable strengths, particularly in its **Facilities**, earning a perfect 5. Professors and Internationality also received very high marks. Conversely, the weakest area evaluated was **Accomodation**, receiving a score of 3.43. Student Life and Value were rated solidly, with Location also performing well.

Overall, this university garners excellent scores across most categories. Its strongest areas are internationality and value, both receiving perfect marks. Professors are also highly regarded. Facilities, location, and student life are rated very well. The weakest area is accommodation, which falls significantly below other metrics.

This institution performs exceptionally well in its teaching staff, earning a strong 4.5 for professors. Its facilities, location, internationality, and overall value also receive respectable scores of 3.5. Student life is rated moderately at 3. However, accommodation emerges as a significant weakness, with a low rating of 1.

This institution garners impressive feedback, particularly excelling in **Professors** with a near-perfect 4.9 and **Location** at 4.83. **Facilities** and **Student Life** also score highly, above 4.45. The **Accomodation** rating, while still solid, is the lowest at 4.28, indicating it's the area with the most room for improvement.

This institution excels in several key areas, achieving perfect scores for location, student life, internationality, and value. Facilities are also highly rated, indicating a positive student experience. Conversely, the university's performance in professor quality and accommodation received moderate scores, suggesting these aspects could be areas for improvement.

This institution garners exceptional ratings in several key areas. Professors and accommodation stand out with perfect scores, indicating a highly valued academic staff and excellent housing options. Student life and facilities also received near-perfect marks, suggesting a vibrant campus environment and well-equipped resources. Conversely, internationality and value represent the weaker aspects, with ratings of 4.4, suggesting potential areas for enhancement in global engagement and affordability.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Around 74% of reviews are positive, praising professors, career services, and valuable skills gained. The remaining ~7.6% of feedback expresses concerns about disorganization and the quality of education.

With an average rating of 4.4/5 from 10 reviews, student feedback is ~100% positive. Recurring themes highlight academic quality, supportive professors, and excellent facilities. No negative feedback was provided.

All 5 reviews were positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Students highlighted practical, hands-on education, approachable faculty, and good career preparation. No negative feedback was reported.

With a 3.5/5 average rating from two reviews, approximately 50% are positive. Students highlight strong academic planning, lectures, and assessments for enhancing learning. Minimal negative feedback was noted.

Students report a highly positive experience, praising the welcoming, international community and engaging, interactive learning. Professors are seen as approachable, and opportunities for personal development and unique academic paths are appreciated. No negative feedback was received.

With one review, the average rating is 4 out of 5 stars. This overwhelmingly positive feedback suggests a good experience, with no negative comments recorded.

All 6 reviews are highly positive, with an average rating of 5/5 stars. Students highlight the strong focus on technology and entrepreneurship, practical learning, and a welcoming atmosphere. No negative feedback was reported.

Rating distribution
5★
27%
40%
100%
0%
67%
0%
100%
4★
45%
60%
0%
50%
33%
100%
0%
3★
21%
0%
0%
50%
0%
0%
0%
2★
4%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
4%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Student-Staff relationship

As far as universities go I think EU business school comes first in terms of student-staff relationship. Every member of the staff I have encountered has been more than helpful. What i think should improve as even tho its not connected to my previous point is I think the school should have more leniency towards tuition payment specially to international students because we are here despite the challenges of having to find willing banks to exchange local currencies to Euros.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Great modern university approach

I am currently a 3rd year student at Forward College and I have thoroughly enjoyed the experience and would recommend it to other students. The interactive approach of Forward where questions, debate, and discussion were encouraged enhanced my learning so much and I feel like I genuinely enjoyed every class. Having the experience of living in 3 different cultures, surrounded by people from all over the world made this experience even more special and helped me develop and grow in so many ways. Another aspect I have loved are the professors. Speaking with friends at other university I am so grateful to have teachers that actually know us, are excited to teach and interact with us, and will always take the time to help you.

Nothing to show

Best Varsity

This was the best Varsity ever. The professionalism is on the high level. I have no dislikes and I highly recommend it to people who are struggling with focus. It's takes special students with disabilities.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close