London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE vs ONCAMPUS Global vs The University of Law Business School vs London Academy of Trading - LAT vs London School of Design & Marketing - LSDM
Side-by-side comparison from 359 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Expert, approachable faculty and high-quality teaching
- +Strong career preparation and marketable skills development
- +Excellent facilities and a supportive learning environment
- +Knowledgeable and supportive faculty
- +Academic and personal growth opportunities
- +Diverse student community and good facilities
- +Supportive staff and wellbeing resources
- +Smooth application process and fast feedback
- +Career coaching and employable skills development
Nothing to show
- +Engaging and effective learning platforms
- +Up-to-date and high-quality course content
- +Practical application through simulators
- +World-class reputation and research excellence
- +Practical, engaging, and career-focused programs
- +Supportive careers services and diverse student community
Nothing to show
- -Poor teaching quality and unclear learning expectations.
- -Lack of structure and significant workload.
- -Disappointing careers service and limited social life.
- -Administrative and management issues are frequently cited.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment are a common complaint.
- -Lack of communication and transparency is a recurring problem.
- -Administrative and management issues caused significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance were major drawbacks.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from faculty was a recurring problem.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative & management issues disrupt student experience.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of support and guidance leaves students feeling unsupported.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Facilities are consistently described as outdated and poorly maintained.
- -Inconsistent or unclear communication from instructors and the institution is a recurring frustration.
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates remarkable strengths in its **Internationality** and **Location**, both receiving scores nearing 4.8. **Professors** also score highly at 4.26. Conversely, **Student Life** is the lowest-rated area, with a score of 3.64, followed by **Accomodation** at 3.79. Other aspects like Facilities and Value fall within a solid mid-range.
A robust profile emerges, with exceptional marks for its professors, location, and student life. The university also scores well in internationality and value. Conversely, facilities and accommodation received slightly lower, though still positive, ratings, representing the areas with the most room for improvement.
This institution shines in several key areas, boasting perfect scores for its facilities and location, alongside excellent marks for internationality and value. Student life receives a solid rating. However, accommodation stands out as a weaker point, scoring significantly lower than other aspects. Professors are also highly regarded.
Nothing to show
Exceptional internationality marks this institution's highest score. Professors also receive strong commendation, indicating a positive academic experience. Conversely, the university significantly underperforms in facilities, location, student life, and accommodation, suggesting these areas require substantial improvement. Value for money is rated positively, reflecting a good return for students despite the noted weaknesses.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in its facilities and location, both scoring a near-perfect 4.86. Internationality and value are also highly rated. Conversely, accommodation presents the lowest score at 3.86, suggesting an area for potential improvement. Student life and professor quality also received solid, though not as outstanding, ratings.
Nothing to show
Nearly 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting a supportive environment, knowledgeable faculty, and excellent facilities. A small percentage (around 3.4%) mention issues like poor lecturing, inconsistent grading, and lack of social life.
With an average rating of 4.74/5 from 19 reviews, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students praise supportive and knowledgeable lecturers, helpful academic support, good facilities, and a diverse community. Minimal negative feedback was noted.
All five reviews are positive, with students praising supportive staff and departments, smooth application processes, and helpful career coaching. Resources like a large library and advance module content are also highlighted.
Nothing to show
The single review highlights a simple, effective learning platform with up-to-date, high-quality marketing content. Students appreciate the marketing simulator for practical application, resulting in a strong 4/5 average rating.
All 8 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.75/5. Students praise Imperial's strong reputation, excellent research facilities, and valuable career support. The diverse, international student body and practical coursework are also frequently highlighted.
Nothing to show
LSE is a great place to create life-long connections and friends. There's a certain sense of community that is special to the university. The staff are hands-on and approachable. The facilities are modern and well-equipped.
Nothing to show
It’s a good place to study with lots of activities to do do and with a lot of useful resources as they have a 4 floor library which is great to find studies or even a quite place to study. The modules are set out perfectly with all the content already put up in advance for the students to have a look at so that they can study in advance and have a look through before lessons.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
