Cracow University of Economics - CUE vs University of Science and Technology - AGH vs Cracow University of Technology - PK vs Cracow School of Business vs Tischner European University - WSE

Side-by-side comparison from 137 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: MUP Oświęcim - PWSZ Oświęcim (5.00)
Cracow University of Economics - CUE: wins 0/6 categories
University of Science and Technology - AGH: wins 0/6 categories
Cracow University of Technology - PK: wins 0/6 categories
Cracow School of Business: wins 0/6 categories
Tischner European University - WSE: wins 0/6 categories
WSB Academy - WSB: wins 0/6 categories
MUP Oświęcim - PWSZ Oświęcim: wins 6/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Applied Economics
Best programme: Computer Science
Best programme: Electrical Engineering
Best programme: BA Business Economics
Kraków, Poland
4.40
Read more reviews
5 reviews
×
Best programme: Management
Best programme: English
Category ratings
Facilities
4.39
4.30
4.27
4.50
Not rated
4.40
5.00
Win
Location
4.19
4.81
4.17
5.00
Not rated
4.20
5.00
Professors
4.19
3.78
4.06
4.00
Not rated
4.00
5.00
Win
Internationality
4.21
3.88
4.31
4.00
Not rated
4.20
5.00
Win
Student life
4.40
4.77
4.27
4.50
Not rated
3.80
5.00
Win
Value
4.13
4.08
4.31
4.50
Not rated
4.40
5.00
Win
Accommodation
3.83
4.15
4.00
4.50
Not rated
3.20
5.00
Win
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Supportive and engaging academic culture
  • +Knowledgeable and accessible instructors
  • +Opportunities for socializing and meeting others
  • +High-quality, technical education and specialized programs
  • +Vibrant campus atmosphere and active student life
  • +Excellent career preparation and industry connections
  • +Practical and up-to-date courses with opportunities for hands-on learning
  • +Passionate and helpful professors with real-world experience
  • +Friendly environment fostering personal and academic growth
  • +Practical application and skill development
  • +Engaging and knowledgeable instructors
  • +Positive student life and atmosphere

Nothing to show

  • +Practical, career-focused curriculum
  • +Flexible scheduling options
  • +Modern, user-friendly university experience
  • +Helpful and supportive students and teachers
  • +Ample opportunities for advancement and study
  • +Convenient location
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Facilities are outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Course content and teaching methods are considered uninspiring or irrelevant.
  • -Poor academic quality and unprofessional staff
  • -Unwelcoming and discriminatory environment
  • -Administrative and management issues
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Facilities are outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Course content and delivery are often seen as uninspiring or irrelevant.
  • -Administrative and management issues create frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
  • -Inflexible course structures and limited support are problematic.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Facilities are often outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Course content or delivery is frequently perceived as unengaging or irrelevant.
  • -Lack of clear communication and disorganization from administration
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance
  • -Ineffective teaching methods and irrelevant curriculum
Rating summary
What students say

This institution demonstrates a commendable overall performance, with student life and facilities emerging as its strongest areas, both scoring above 4.4. Internationality and professors also receive solid marks. Accommodations, however, present a relative weakness with a rating of 3.83, suggesting this is an area for potential improvement. The university also fares well in location and value.

This institution receives particularly strong marks for its location and student life, with both scoring close to a perfect 4.8. Accommodations and facilities also rate well above average. However, the university's professors and internationality aspects received the lowest scores among the surveyed categories, indicating areas for potential improvement.

This university receives excellent marks in several key areas, particularly Internationality and Value, both scoring a high 4.31. Facilities and Student Life are also very strong, averaging 4.27. Professors and Location are well-regarded at 4.06 and 4.17 respectively. The weakest area, though still solid, is Accomodation at a 4.0 rating.

This institution receives commendable evaluations across most aspects, with its **Location** standing out as a perfect score. **Facilities**, **Student Life**, **Accomodation**, and **Value** are all highly rated at 4.5. **Professors** and **Internationality** also score well with 4 out of 5. The weakest area, though still strong, is **Professors** and **Internationality**.

Nothing to show

This university garners exceptional ratings in several key areas. Facilities and value are particularly strong, both scoring an impressive 4.4. Location and internationality also received high marks at 4.2. Conversely, accommodation stands out as the weakest area, with a rating of 3.2, while student life, at 3.8, is also on the lower end of the spectrum. Professors are well-regarded with a solid 4.0.

Consistently outstanding evaluations mark this institution. Every surveyed category received a perfect score of 5, indicating exceptional performance across facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value. There are no weak areas to highlight, as all aspects of the university are rated as excellent.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a 4.29/5 average rating from 49 reviews, ~98% are positive, highlighting supportive staff and engaging academic environments. A small amount of negative feedback exists.

With an average rating of 4.19/5, ~87% of 63 reviews are positive, highlighting strong technical programs, city-center campus, and vibrant student life. A single negative review expressed dissatisfaction.

With 14 out of 17 reviews being positive (~82%), students praise practical, up-to-date courses and a friendly, supportive environment. Professors and staff are described as helpful and passionate.

With an average rating of 4.5/5 and 0% negative feedback, student reviews are overwhelmingly positive. Key highlights include valuable practical and theoretical programs, professional and supportive lecturers, and a positive student atmosphere.

Nothing to show

All five reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.4/5. Students praise practical and career-focused learning, flexible schedules, and modern approaches. The only minor criticisms relate to occasional inconsistent lecturer fairness and demanding part-time scheduling.

With a 5/5 average rating, the single review is entirely positive. It highlights great students and teachers, advancement opportunities, and a convenient location. No negative feedback was provided.

Rating distribution
5★
39%
35%
24%
50%
0%
40%
100%
4★
53%
52%
59%
50%
0%
60%
0%
3★
6%
11%
18%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
2%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
2%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Subject showing you how future work looks like

I'm on my third year right now and I'd like to say a couple of words about one of the subjects. It's called software engineering and it teaches you a lot of things that you will need for work as a software developer - On lectures we have latest trends like agile/scrum, docker, Kubernetes etc. and on labs we do an actual project for the client. It's a great experience and I would recommend it to everyone

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close