Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies - ASE vs Romanian-American University vs Romanian-American School Of Business - ASEBUSS vs Tiffin University Bucharest vs Bucharest Business School - BBS

Side-by-side comparison from 102 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Hyperion University - UHB (5.00)
Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies - ASE: wins 0/7 categories
Romanian-American University: wins 0/7 categories
Romanian-American School Of Business - ASEBUSS: wins 0/7 categories
Tiffin University Bucharest: wins 0/7 categories
Bucharest Business School - BBS: wins 0/7 categories
Hyperion University - UHB: wins 7/7 categories
Kepler University: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Cybernetics
Best programme: Accounting
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Bucharest, Romania
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Law
Bucharest, Romania
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
3.79
3.98
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Location
4.62
3.82
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Professors
3.89
4.15
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Internationality
3.80
4.33
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Student life
4.39
3.97
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Value
4.05
3.98
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Accommodation
4.08
3.82
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Supportive and knowledgeable professors
  • +Strong, practical, and well-structured programs
  • +Good career opportunities and academic reputation
  • +Excellent, knowledgeable, and approachable professors.
  • +Practical and well-structured courses with real-world application.
  • +Numerous career, internship, and international exchange opportunities.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Helpful and supportive teachers
  • +Excellent teaching quality

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Outdated facilities and irrelevant curriculum.
  • -Lack of student focus and prioritization.
  • -Perceived as a money-making institution with poor value.
  • -Constant and disruptive construction noise negatively impacts sleep and living conditions.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
  • -Lack of support for student success and academic advising is a concern.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

The university demonstrates a remarkably strong performance in its **Location**, achieving a score of 4.62. Student Life also received high marks at 4.39, with Accommodation and Value scoring favorably around 4.08 and 4.05 respectively. Conversely, **Facilities** emerged as the lowest-rated area, registering at 3.79. Professors and Internationality also fell within a similar mid-range, with scores of 3.89 and 3.80.

This institution demonstrates a well-rounded performance, with **Internationality** standing out as its strongest attribute. Students also rated **Professors** highly. Areas for potential improvement include **Location** and **Accomodation**, which received the lowest scores. Other aspects like Facilities, Student Life, and Value fall within a solid mid-range.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Across all assessed aspects, this institution demonstrates outstanding performance, achieving a perfect score of 5 in every area. Notably, its strengths lie uniformly across facilities, professor quality, location desirability, vibrant student life, accommodation provisions, a high degree of internationality, and exceptional value for money. No specific weaknesses are identified, indicating a consistently excellent experience for students.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

~98% of reviews are positive, praising knowledgeable and supportive professors, structured programs, and good career opportunities. A small ~2% of feedback mentioned outdated facilities and a perceived lack of student-focused administration.

With an average rating of 4.17/5, ~83% of reviews are positive. Students praise knowledgeable and approachable professors, well-structured curricula, and interactive teaching methods. One negative review mentioned disruptive drilling noise.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With a 5/5 average rating and 100% positive feedback, reviews highlight excellent, helpful teachers. Students appreciate the willingness of instructors to assist and explain course material.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
45%
50%
0%
0%
0%
100%
0%
4★
37%
33%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3★
17%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
2%
17%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Useful Programme with Room to Improve

Overall, I had a very positive experience with the International Economics programme. The courses provided a solid understanding of global markets, trade, monetary policy, development, and the economic forces shaping international business The programme could still improve in terms of administration, communication, and consistency across courses. Some classes felt more practical and engaging than others.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close