Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies - ASE vs Romanian-American University vs Romanian-American School Of Business - ASEBUSS vs Tiffin University Bucharest vs Bucharest Business School - BBS

Side-by-side comparison from 103 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: National University of Arts Bucharest - UNArte (4.50)
Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies - ASE: wins 1/7 categories
Romanian-American University: wins 1/7 categories
Romanian-American School Of Business - ASEBUSS: wins 0/7 categories
Tiffin University Bucharest: wins 0/7 categories
Bucharest Business School - BBS: wins 0/7 categories
Kepler University: wins 0/7 categories
National University of Arts Bucharest - UNArte: wins 5/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Cybernetics
Best programme: Accounting
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Bucharest, Romania
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Fine Art
Category ratings
Facilities
3.79
3.98
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Win
Location
4.62
3.82
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Professors
3.89
4.15
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Internationality
3.80
4.33
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Student life
4.39
3.97
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.50
Win
Value
4.05
3.98
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.50
Win
Accommodation
4.08
Win
3.82
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Supportive and knowledgeable professors
  • +Strong, practical, and well-structured programs
  • +Good career opportunities and academic reputation
  • +Excellent, knowledgeable, and approachable professors.
  • +Practical and well-structured courses with real-world application.
  • +Numerous career, internship, and international exchange opportunities.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Dedicated and knowledgeable professors
  • +Welcoming and respectful environment
  • +Exceptional teaching and international perspectives
Cons
  • -Outdated facilities and irrelevant curriculum.
  • -Lack of student focus and prioritization.
  • -Perceived as a money-making institution with poor value.
  • -Constant and disruptive construction noise negatively impacts sleep and living conditions.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources detract from the learning experience.
  • -Unclear communication and lack of support from instructors are recurring problems.
Rating summary
What students say

The university demonstrates a remarkably strong performance in its **Location**, achieving a score of 4.62. Student Life also received high marks at 4.39, with Accommodation and Value scoring favorably around 4.08 and 4.05 respectively. Conversely, **Facilities** emerged as the lowest-rated area, registering at 3.79. Professors and Internationality also fell within a similar mid-range, with scores of 3.89 and 3.80.

This institution demonstrates a well-rounded performance, with **Internationality** standing out as its strongest attribute. Students also rated **Professors** highly. Areas for potential improvement include **Location** and **Accomodation**, which received the lowest scores. Other aspects like Facilities, Student Life, and Value fall within a solid mid-range.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Offering a compelling academic experience, this institution excels with perfect scores for its professors and prime location. Students can also expect a vibrant student life and good value for their investment. Areas for potential improvement include its facilities and accommodation, which received solid but not perfect ratings. Internationality is also rated positively, indicating a well-rounded environment.

Reviews summary
Highlights

~98% of reviews are positive, praising knowledgeable and supportive professors, structured programs, and good career opportunities. A small ~2% of feedback mentioned outdated facilities and a perceived lack of student-focused administration.

With an average rating of 4.17/5, ~83% of reviews are positive. Students praise knowledgeable and approachable professors, well-structured curricula, and interactive teaching methods. One negative review mentioned disruptive drilling noise.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4.5/5 and 100% positive feedback, students praise dedicated teachers and a welcoming atmosphere. Despite some equipment limitations, instructional quality is exceptional.

Rating distribution
5★
45%
50%
0%
0%
0%
0%
50%
4★
37%
33%
0%
0%
0%
0%
50%
3★
17%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
2%
17%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Useful Programme with Room to Improve

Overall, I had a very positive experience with the International Economics programme. The courses provided a solid understanding of global markets, trade, monetary policy, development, and the economic forces shaping international business The programme could still improve in terms of administration, communication, and consistency across courses. Some classes felt more practical and engaging than others.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close