EU Business School vs United International Business Schools - UIBS vs Sustainability Management School - SUMAS vs Institut Avrio de Geneve vs Rushford Business School

Side-by-side comparison from 281 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Rushford Business School (4.80)
EU Business School: wins 0/7 categories
United International Business Schools - UIBS: wins 1/7 categories
Sustainability Management School - SUMAS: wins 0/7 categories
Institut Avrio de Geneve: wins 0/7 categories
Rushford Business School: wins 6/7 categories
University of Business And International Studies Geneva - UBIS: wins 0/7 categories
Geneva School of Diplomacy - GSD: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Barcelona, Spain
3.90
Read more reviews
251 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Administration
Best programme: Accounting and Management Information Systems
Geneva, Switzerland
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Geneva, Switzerland
4.80
Top
Read more reviews
20 reviews
×
Best programme: MBA
Best programme: International Relations
Category ratings
Facilities
4.04
4.00
1.33
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
2.00
Location
4.73
4.75
Win
2.00
Not rated
4.74
Not rated
2.67
Professors
4.04
4.75
3.33
Not rated
4.90
Win
Not rated
3.33
Internationality
4.72
4.50
3.33
Not rated
4.85
Win
Not rated
4.67
Student life
4.22
4.25
1.00
Not rated
4.40
Win
Not rated
2.33
Value
3.87
4.50
1.33
Not rated
4.80
Win
Not rated
2.00
Accommodation
3.42
4.00
1.00
Not rated
4.74
Win
Not rated
2.50
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Helpful professors and career support
  • +Valuable practical and theoretical business knowledge
  • +Enriching overall student experience
  • +Supportive and helpful faculty
  • +Positive and enriching learning experience
  • +Safe and well-equipped campus
  • +Engaging and knowledgeable instructors
  • +Relevant and practical course content
  • +Supportive and collaborative learning environment

Nothing to show

  • +Flexible study schedules and diverse themes
  • +High-quality faculty with global perspectives
  • +Relevant MBA programs for career advancement

Nothing to show

  • +Experienced and accessible professors from diverse backgrounds.
  • +Extensive industry connections and career opportunities.
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause disorganization and lack of support.
  • -Outdated facilities and a focus on attendance over quality education are criticized.
  • -The educational program is perceived as basic and unaccredited in some regions.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support frustrates students.
  • -Administrative and management issues are prevalent.
  • -Lack of transparency in grading and unresponsiveness to student concerns.
  • -The school's accreditation and recognition are questionable.

Nothing to show

  • -Lack of promised support and opportunities.
  • -Poor post-enrollment communication.

Nothing to show

  • -Overpriced and low value for money.
  • -Unqualified or unmotivated professors.
  • -Unreliable administration and accreditation issues.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution excels in several key areas, with Location and Internationality receiving the highest marks at 4.73. Student Life also scores well at 4.22. Conversely, Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, scoring 3.42, suggesting room for improvement. Facilities and Professors are rated consistently around 4.04, while Value sits at a respectable 3.87.

Academic and environmental aspects of the university are highly regarded, with professors and location both receiving a near-perfect score of 4.75. Student life is also a positive, scoring 4.25, and internationality and value are strong at 4.5. Facilities and accommodation present the weakest areas, both rated at 4.

Overall, the university presents a mixed performance across various aspects. The strongest areas are the professors and internationality, both receiving a solid 3.33 rating. In contrast, student life and accommodation are the weakest points, scoring a low 1. However, facilities and value also lag behind with scores of 1.33, while location sits at a moderate 2.

Nothing to show

This institution receives excellent marks, with its **Facilities** standing out as the strongest area, earning a perfect 5. **Professors** also garner high praise at 4.9. **Student Life**, while still strong, is the relatively weakest aspect with a score of 4.4. The university demonstrates a solid all-around performance with high ratings in location, accommodation, internationality, and value.

Nothing to show

This institution excels in internationality, receiving a score of 4.67. Conversely, its facilities and value for money are areas needing improvement, both scoring a low 2. Professors, location, and student life fall into the mid-range, with accommodation also receiving a moderate rating.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Around 74% of reviews are positive, praising professors, career services, and valuable skills gained. The remaining ~7.6% of feedback expresses concerns about disorganization and the quality of education.

With an average rating of 4.5/5, ~75% of reviews are positive, highlighting a supportive learning environment and helpful, passionate faculty. One review mentioned slow administrative services.

All three reviews are negative (100%), with an average rating of 1/5. Recurring themes include unrecognized degrees, poor administration with unresponsiveness and lack of transparency in grading, and disorganized, unprofessional management.

Nothing to show

Nearly all reviews are positive, praising program flexibility, diverse themes, and supportive faculty. A small percentage of feedback mentions unfulfilled promises and poor communication.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 2/5, approximately 67% of reviews are negative. While one positive review highlights great professors and networking opportunities, negative feedback focuses on the program being overpriced and underdelivered, with unaccredited degrees and issues with transcripts.

Rating distribution
5★
27%
75%
0%
0%
90%
0%
0%
4★
45%
0%
0%
0%
5%
0%
33%
3★
21%
25%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
4%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
4%
0%
100%
0%
5%
0%
67%
Most useful review
Most liked
Student-Staff relationship

As far as universities go I think EU business school comes first in terms of student-staff relationship. Every member of the staff I have encountered has been more than helpful. What i think should improve as even tho its not connected to my previous point is I think the school should have more leniency towards tuition payment specially to international students because we are here despite the challenges of having to find willing banks to exchange local currencies to Euros.

Nothing to show

A recent drop out

1. Kindly note, it is a registered private school only, but the degrees are school-issued, not officially recognized Swiss university degrees. They are relying on the entry-tier US accreditor ACBSP itself, which is well below AACSB/EQUIS/AMBA/HEdA accreditation. So please do not be confused thinking it is a proper Swiss university. 2. Actually the school is more like a small company only, having less than 5 staff members on site. And one thing I must tell, before enrollment they are very friendly, but after joining the friendliness is finishing. 3. In the classes there are hardly 5 students at master's and bachelor's level, and many times nobody is even coming to the campus. On top of that, the teachers/staffs seemed to get fired in the middle of the semester itself. 4. One more important thing , the grades are coming from the the founder or staffs directly, very subjective and no transparency at all. The professors are not even having the right to decide the final grade!! How can this be acceptable, I am asking? 5. Now they have started selling online courses also. So I will not be surprised if one fine day they are closing the campus fully and doing only online business.

Nothing to show

Experience with Rushford business school

I regret choosing Rushford Business School for my MBA. Despite detailed discussions and assurances from its president, Syed Tufail, none of the promised support or opportunities were delivered. Communication after enrollment was extremely poor, and the overall experience did not meet expectations. Sharing this to help others make informed decisions.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close