The University of Manchester vs London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE vs EM Normandie - EM Normandie vs Teesside University vs Edinburgh Business School
Side-by-side comparison from 688 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Inspiring and engaging learning environment with supportive and responsive tutors.
- +Vibrant student life and social experiences alongside academic pursuits.
- +High-quality, well-structured, and engaging programmes, including online options.
- +Expert and experienced faculty
- +Supportive and collaborative community atmosphere
- +Diverse and flexible learning and assessment methods
- +Connecting theory to practice through real-world cases.
- +Diverse international environment and global opportunities.
- +Relevant industry-focused courses and knowledgeable faculty.
- +Accessible and supportive faculty and resources.
- +Practical, industry-focused education and career preparation.
- +Comprehensive facilities and diverse program offerings.
- +Practical business knowledge focus
- +Accessible, self-study friendly modules
- +Flexible distance learning and networking
Nothing to show
- +Passionate and supportive staff fostering happiness and personal drive
- +Emphasis on individual happiness and progress over external pressures
- -Outdated or non-functional facilities and lack of practical experience.
- -Unorganized course structure and unhelpful, unresponsive, or self-promoting lecturers.
- -Difficulty in reaching professors and poor communication regarding course relevance.
- -Poor teaching quality and lack of structure in academic programs.
- -Inadequate support services and limited social opportunities.
- -High fees with perceived low value and administrative issues.
- -Perceived as a money-making scheme with mediocre teaching.
- -Lack of lecturer and student support
- -Outdated educational facilities and poor subject knowledge from professors
- -Safety concerns regarding crime in the area
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources detract from the learning experience.
- -Lack of clear communication and support creates uncertainty.
Nothing to show
- -Outdated curriculum and ineffective teaching methods.
- -Poor administrative and management support.
Overall, the university presents a strong showing across most metrics. Its highest-rated aspects include Internationality and Location, both exceeding 4.5. Student Life and Facilities also score well above average. The area with the lowest score is Accomodation, registering significantly lower than other categories. Value and Professors also received solid, though not leading, scores.
Perceived strengths of this institution lie significantly in its **Location** and **Internationality**, both receiving top marks. Conversely, **Student Life** emerges as the area with the lowest reported satisfaction. Ratings for Facilities, Professors, Accomodation, and Value fall within a moderate to good range, indicating generally positive feedback across these aspects.
This institution performs well across most aspects, with **Internationality** standing out as its strongest area. Facilities, Professors, and Value also receive high marks. Areas for potential improvement include **Location**, which scored the lowest, and Accomodation. Student life and the overall value proposition are rated solidly in the mid-to-high range.
This institution receives particularly high marks for its **facilities**, achieving a score of 4.47. Internationality is also a strong point at 4.30, with professors rated well at 4.26. Student life, value, and location also score favorably between 4.09 and 4.17. The area with the lowest rating is **accommodation**, standing at 3.79.
This institution garners strong marks, particularly excelling in its **Professors, Location, Internationality, and Value**, all receiving perfect scores. Facilities and Student Life are also well-regarded with solid ratings. The weakest area identified is **Accomodation**, which received a moderate rating. Overall, the university presents a very attractive package, especially for those prioritizing faculty quality, geographic convenience, global engagement, and cost-effectiveness.
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates a mixed but generally solid performance in its assessed areas. Its strongest suit is undoubtedly **accommodation**, receiving a high rating of 4. Conversely, **student life** emerges as the weakest area, scoring a comparatively low 2.5. Other aspects like facilities, professors, location, internationality, and value all fall within the moderate range, indicating areas that perform adequately without standing out significantly.
With a ~98.7% positive sentiment (4.25/5 average), students praise engaging teaching, strong support, and a vibrant campus life. Limited negative feedback (~1.3%) mentions course structure and professor accessibility issues.
Most reviews (~74%) are positive, praising academic reputation, expert faculty, and excellent resources. A small percentage (~3.4%) express dissatisfaction with lecturing quality, course structure, or career services.
Most reviews (approximately 71%) highlight a positive learning atmosphere, inspiring professors, and valuable international experiences. A small amount of feedback (around 14%) suggests mediocrity and a focus on profit. The average rating is 3.86/5.
~96% of reviews are positive, highlighting strong support, excellent facilities, and practical, career-focused education. A small percentage of feedback expresses dissatisfaction with lecturer knowledge and student support.
With a 5/5 average rating from one review, student feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Positive aspects include appreciating practical business knowledge and well-developed modules suitable for self-study and distance learning. No negative feedback was recorded.
Nothing to show
Reviews are split, with positive feedback highlighting happiness and passion, while negative feedback points to outdated courses and staff lacking industry depth, representing about 50% of the feedback.
The course content is well-structured and covers key areas such as digital forensics, threat intelligence, network security, incident response, and cyber risk management. One of the biggest strengths of the programme is its practical approach. Lab-based sessions, real-world case studies, and hands-on tools helped me understand how cyber attacks and investigations work in real scenarios. The lecturers are knowledgeable, supportive, and approachable, and they encourage critical thinking and independent research. The university also offers good learning resources, including online materials, libraries, and lab facilities. Group projects and assignments helped develop teamwork, problem-solving, and technical skills, which are very important for a career in cyber security. Overall, the programme prepared me well for further study and professional opportunities in the cyber security field. However, there are some areas that could be improved. In some modules, the workload was quite heavy within a short period, which made it challenging to manage deadlines. A few topics could have been explained in more depth, especially advanced threat intelligence and real-world industry tools. Additionally, more industry collaboration, internships, or career guidance would make the programme even stronger. Some technical resources and lab environments could also be updated to reflect the latest cyber security trends and technologies.
LSE is a great place to create life-long connections and friends. There's a certain sense of community that is special to the university. The staff are hands-on and approachable. The facilities are modern and well-equipped.
Nothing to show
The approachable teachers and the facilities are top-notch. The majority of my studies were during COVID-19 so student life can't be assessed. Accommodations in Middlebrough are cheap and very affordable when compared to other places and other universities. The course modules were very helpful except for 3D interactive visualization which I really don't think is applicable as a data scientist and can be replaced with SQL instead.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
