University of Milano-Bicocca - UNIMIB vs POLIMI Graduate School of Management vs SDA Bocconi School of Management vs Humanitas University - HU vs IULM University

Side-by-side comparison from 94 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Vita-Salute San Raffaele University - UniSR (4.90)
University of Milano-Bicocca - UNIMIB: wins 0/7 categories
POLIMI Graduate School of Management: wins 2/7 categories
SDA Bocconi School of Management: wins 0/7 categories
Humanitas University - HU: wins 0/7 categories
IULM University: wins 0/7 categories
European School of Economics - ESE: wins 1/7 categories
Vita-Salute San Raffaele University - UniSR: wins 4/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Economics
Best programme: Finance
Best programme: Medicine and Surgery
Milano, Italy
4.30
Read more reviews
6 reviews
×
Best programme: Communication and Public Relations
London, The United Kingdom
4.50
Read more reviews
39 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Administration
Best programme: Fisioterapia
Category ratings
Facilities
3.68
4.50
Not rated
4.60
4.67
4.33
4.71
Win
Location
3.84
4.00
Not rated
3.80
4.67
4.79
Win
4.43
Professors
3.48
4.00
Not rated
4.00
4.67
4.44
4.71
Win
Internationality
3.12
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.60
3.17
4.51
4.43
Student life
3.60
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.20
4.00
4.43
4.57
Value
3.72
4.50
Not rated
4.20
4.50
4.31
4.86
Win
Accommodation
3.17
3.50
Not rated
3.60
4.17
4.11
4.20
Win
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Great organisation and facilities
  • +Good academic environment and teachers
  • +Engaging extra-curricular activities and international atmosphere
  • +Innovative and forward-looking curriculum
  • +Strong career development and industry connections
  • +Flexible and student-friendly learning environment

Nothing to show

  • +International focus and English-taught programs
  • +Excellent facilities and proximity to research hospital
  • +Strong career prospects and innovative programs
  • +Career-focused and interesting courses
  • +Supportive professors and staff
  • +Modern and well-equipped campus facilities
  • +International relevance & practical/hands-on experience
  • +Welcoming & supportive environment with friendly, helpful staff/faculty
  • +Diverse, small classes with experienced professors
  • +Integrated academic, clinical, and research environment
  • +High-quality teaching and knowledgeable, available instructors
  • +Excellent preparation, rich internships, and modern facilities
Cons
  • -Administrative and organizational issues
  • -Lack of personal attention from faculty
  • -Concerns about professor qualifications
  • -Excessive administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment.
  • -Lack of practical application and unclear curriculum.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
  • -Inconsistent teaching quality and lack of support for students are disliked.
  • -Excessive fees and unclear financial policies are a major source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are frequently criticized.
  • -Poor communication and a lack of responsiveness from faculty and administration are common complaints.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are often criticized.
  • -Poor teaching quality and unengaging course content are commonly cited.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and transparency leads to confusion.
Rating summary
What students say

The university garners its highest marks for Location and Value, both exceeding a 3.7 rating. Student life and facilities also received positive feedback, with scores above 3.5. Conversely, Internationality and Accommodation represent the areas with the lowest ratings, falling below 3.2. Professors received a middling score, indicating room for improvement.

The university scores exceptionally well in Student Life and Internationality, both receiving perfect marks. Its Facilities and Value also stand out with strong ratings of 4.5. Professors and Location are solid at 4.0. The lowest-rated area is Accomodation, with a score of 3.5. This indicates a positive overall experience, particularly for social engagement and global integration.

Nothing to show

This institution garners considerable praise for its **Facilities** and **Internationality**, both scoring an impressive 4.6. Student life and overall value are also well-regarded, with scores of 4.2. Areas for potential improvement lie in **Accomodation** and **Location**, which received lower ratings of 3.6 and 3.8 respectively. Professors are rated favorably at 4.

This institution garners excellent scores in several key areas. Its facilities, professors, and location are all highly rated, achieving near-perfect marks. Student life and accommodation also receive positive feedback. However, internationality stands out as the weakest aspect, with a significantly lower score compared to other metrics. The overall value of the university is rated very favorably.

Student feedback indicates strong satisfaction across several aspects of university life. Location stands out as the highest-rated area, with internationality and professors also receiving excellent marks. While student life and value are also highly regarded, facilities represent the weakest area among the surveyed categories. Overall, the institution demonstrates a solid performance with clear strengths in its external and academic offerings.

This institution receives outstanding marks, particularly for its **professors** and **value**, which are rated exceptionally high. The **facilities** and **student life** are also strong points. While **accommodation** and **location** are rated slightly lower, they remain positive. The university demonstrates good **internationality**, contributing to a well-rounded experience.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting a good academic environment, modern facilities, and an international atmosphere. A small portion of feedback notes organizational issues and high costs. The average rating is 3.82/5.

All reviews are positive, with students praising the program's focus on finance technology, career prospects, and the supportive, organized learning environment. The university is described as flexible and student-friendly.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4.2/5 from 5 reviews, ~80% are positive, highlighting innovative programs and good facilities. Some mention an intense workload and occasional disorganization.

All 6 reviews are positive, averaging 4.33/5 stars. Students praise the interesting courses, career opportunities, supportive staff, and good facilities. Some mention a desire for more international focus.

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~95% of feedback highlighting an engaging, internationally relevant learning experience and a welcoming environment. Students appreciate practical learning, helpful staff, and international class settings. No negative feedback was recorded.

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (100%), with an average rating of 4.86/5. Students frequently highlight the strong integration of campus, hospital, and research, along with high-quality teaching and valuable internship opportunities.

Rating distribution
5★
21%
33%
0%
40%
33%
59%
86%
4★
50%
67%
0%
40%
67%
36%
14%
3★
26%
0%
0%
20%
0%
5%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
3%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Bicocca Sociology

I am following the degree course in Sociology. I'm really happy with how I'm finding myself at this university. I think the professors are very good and available in giving any kind of information. Very active university life with numerous initiatives. Clean and sunny environment. I highly recommend it.

Great technology competences related to the financial world

The program offers great technological and concrete competencies of the technology applied to the financial sector. Students are highly motivated and fun to be around. The courses are highly linked to innovative and forward-looking topics and deliver great career prospects.

Nothing to show

Would undoubtedly choose it again if I had to

Personally, I am quite happy with my choice to come to study at Humanitas University and would do so again if I had to. It is by no means a perfect university, it is currently going through some 'growing pains' that result in disorganization, some professors are better than others, etc. However, it's a new university that is growing, the hospital is right next to it, the facilities are new and excellent, there is a lot of support for international students, etc. In my opinion, the pros heavily outweigh the cons.

Nothing to show

The amazing professors/teachers there!

First of all since my campus was in the heart of Rome, the place and inside of the university was like a whole museum. I love how friendly and helpful the staff was, the professors were one in a million. I love how they did all their best to tell us about the subjects in detail and in a fun way with examples for us to get into it more. I liked how they make time and engage in it and actually help us to teach us, so it was all in one reading writing with our own brain and infos searching for the sources by ourselves listening but also being able to express our own way of knowledge on the topics!

A place for opportunities!

I completed both my Bachelor’s (Triennale) and Master’s (Magistrale) degrees in Biotechnology. Being in a small class was really helpful. It made communication between students and professors much easier. Also, the program offers a one-year internship packed with opportunities! .

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close