London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE vs ONCAMPUS Global vs University of Roehampton vs London Academy of Trading - LAT vs London School of Design & Marketing - LSDM

Side-by-side comparison from 397 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE: wins 0/2 categories
ONCAMPUS Global: wins 0/2 categories
University of Roehampton: wins 0/2 categories
London Academy of Trading - LAT: wins 2/2 categories
London School of Design & Marketing - LSDM: wins 0/2 categories
Regent College London - RCL: wins 0/2 categories
Skills Union: wins 0/2 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Economics
London, The United Kingdom
4.80
Read more reviews
21 reviews
×
Best programme: Undergraduate Foundation Programme
London, The United Kingdom
4.50
Read more reviews
45 reviews
×
Best programme: Forensic Psychology
London, The United Kingdom
5.00
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: Advanced Trading Course
Best programme: Marketing
Harrow, The United Kingdom
5.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Business and Management
London, The United Kingdom
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
4.05
4.44
4.43
5.00
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
Location
4.78
4.75
4.48
5.00
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
Professors
4.26
4.76
4.53
5.00
4.00
5.00
Not rated
Internationality
4.80
4.62
4.36
5.00
5.00
5.00
Not rated
Student life
3.65
4.58
4.40
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Value
4.05
4.52
4.18
5.00
4.00
5.00
Not rated
Accommodation
3.80
4.35
4.02
4.50
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Knowledgeable and approachable faculty
  • +High-quality academic programs and clear feedback
  • +Excellent facilities and resources
  • +Supportive and approachable teachers
  • +Excellent student support services
  • +Convenient campus location and facilities
  • +Practical experience through placements and hands-on training
  • +Supportive and dedicated lecturers
  • +Positive campus environment and community feel
  • +Supportive and knowledgeable tutors
  • +Engaging daily webinars with market analysis
  • +Improved trading profitability and understanding
  • +Engaging and effective learning platforms
  • +Up-to-date and high-quality course content
  • +Practical application through simulators
  • +Wide module variety and relevant courses
  • +Strong student support and opportunities
  • +Practical knowledge for career preparation

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Poor teaching quality and unstructured courses.
  • -High fees combined with lack of support and career services.
  • -Limited social life and judgmental environment.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are prevalent.
  • -Inefficient administrative processes and lack of clear communication are frustrating.
  • -Limited resources and support for academic needs are a concern.
  • -Administrative & management issues are a major source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
  • -Lack of support and resources is frequently mentioned.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of engagement and uninspired teaching methods are disliked.
  • -Administrative & management issues disrupt student experience.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of support and guidance leaves students feeling unsupported.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from faculty and staff is a recurring problem.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Examining the university's performance reveals a diverse set of scores. The strongest areas are **Internationality** and **Location**, both receiving very high marks. **Student Life** stands out as the weakest performing category. Other areas like **Professors**, **Accomodation**, and **Facilities** received solid, above-average ratings, with **Value** also scoring positively.

This institution garners strong approval across multiple aspects, with particularly high marks for its **Professors (4.76)** and **Location (4.75)**. Student life and internationality also score well, above 4.5. **Accommodations (4.35)** received the lowest rating, though still generally positive, while facilities and value demonstrate solid, above-average performance.

Professors and facilities are highly regarded at this institution, earning top marks. Student life and location also receive favorable reviews. While generally positive, accommodation and value represent the areas with the lowest scores, indicating potential for improvement. Internationality is rated solidly in the middle.

Across numerous metrics, this institution demonstrates exceptional strengths. Facilities, professors, location, student life, and internationality all garnered perfect scores, indicating outstanding offerings in these domains. The sole area falling slightly short, though still very strong, is accommodation at 4.5 stars, suggesting a minor area for potential enhancement compared to its otherwise flawless performance.

Exceptional internationality marks this institution's highest score. Professors also receive strong commendation, indicating a positive academic experience. Conversely, the university significantly underperforms in facilities, location, student life, and accommodation, suggesting these areas require substantial improvement. Value for money is rated positively, reflecting a good return for students despite the noted weaknesses.

This university excels remarkably in several key areas, receiving perfect scores for its facilities, professors, location, and internationality, as well as strong value. However, significant weaknesses are evident in student life and accommodation, both of which are rated at zero.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

Approximately 96.6% of reviews are positive, praising knowledgeable professors, supportive learning environments, and strong academic reputations. A small percentage (around 3.4%) of negative feedback cites issues with lecturing, grading, and course structure.

All 21 reviews are positive, averaging 4.76/5 stars. Students frequently praised helpful teachers, strong academic support, and good facilities. Some also highlighted a positive transition experience and newfound confidence.

With an average rating of 4.49/5, ~91% of 45 reviews are positive. Students praise the holistic, evidence-based nursing practice, valuable clinical placements, and supportive environment. Some mention inconsistent mentor support and slow administration.

Both reviews are highly positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Key highlights include excellent tutors, engaging daily webinars, and improved trading profitability. Students appreciated the supportive learning environment that clarified market understanding.

The single review highlights a simple, effective learning platform with up-to-date, high-quality marketing content. Students appreciate the marketing simulator for practical application, resulting in a strong 4/5 average rating.

With one review, the average rating is 5/5 stars. The student highlighted access to diverse modules and courses, strong student support, and preparation for the job market. No negative feedback was recorded.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
34%
76%
60%
100%
0%
100%
0%
4★
44%
24%
29%
0%
100%
0%
0%
3★
18%
0%
11%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
2%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Great Experience

LSE is a great place to create life-long connections and friends. There's a certain sense of community that is special to the university. The staff are hands-on and approachable. The facilities are modern and well-equipped.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close