emlyon business school vs Mumbai University vs Shri Vile Parle Kelvani Mandal - SVKM vs Narsee Monjee Institute of Management Studies - NMIMS vs upGrad
Side-by-side comparison from 187 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practical, international, and globally-minded programs with diverse student body.
- +Strong focus on professional development through internships and career support.
- +Rich program offerings with opportunities for personal and academic growth.
- +Comprehensive course offerings and accessible education
- +Engaging practical sessions and knowledgeable faculty
- +Streamlined application and submission processes
- +Excellent faculty and well-designed curriculum
- +Opportunities for student growth and participation in activities
- +Focus on student welfare and comprehensive education
- +Industry-relevant curriculum and practical application focus
- +Knowledgeable and approachable faculty with real-world insights
- +Opportunities for internships, hands-on learning, and career preparation
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- +World-class equipment and facilities
- +Diverse student body and networking opportunities
- +Encouraging and friendly faculty
- -Lack of practical learning and perceived filler content.
- -Unfair and frustrating grading, especially for group projects.
- -Poor professor engagement and program support.
- -Administrative inefficiency and poor management are significant problems.
- -Outdated facilities and the reality of the college experience differ from promotions.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are consistently criticized.
- -Lack of engaging teaching methods and outdated curriculum are disliked.
- -Poor communication and disorganization from administrative staff.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources.
- -Ineffective teaching methods and unsupportive instructors.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor upkeep are consistently criticized.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
Reviewing the provided ratings, the institution demonstrates notable strengths in **Internationality** and **Location**, both receiving scores above 4.5. Conversely, **Accomodation** emerged as the area with the lowest rating, falling below 4.0. Other categories, including Facilities, Professors, Student Life, and Value, all scored commendably, generally ranging between 4.05 and 4.4.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **location** and **value for money**, both receiving high marks. **Student life** and **professors** also earned positive scores. Conversely, **facilities**, **accommodation**, and **internationality** present areas for potential improvement, indicated by their lower ratings. Overall, the university offers a compelling proposition, particularly for those prioritizing location and value, with opportunities to enhance the student experience in other aspects.
This institution garners excellent marks in several key areas, notably achieving perfect scores for its professors, location, and internationality. Student life and overall value are also highly regarded. Conversely, accommodation stands out as a weaker point, receiving a comparatively lower rating. Facilities are rated well but not exceptionally.
This institution demonstrates significant strengths in its academic and environmental offerings. Professors are highly regarded, receiving a near-perfect score, closely followed by location and value for money, both excelling. Student life and facilities also score well, indicating a positive overall campus experience. However, accommodation presents the weakest area, with a notably lower rating compared to other aspects. Internationality is also a moderate area, performing just above average.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This institution garners outstanding scores for its facilities, location, student life, and internationality, all receiving a perfect 5. Professors are also highly regarded with a score of 4, and the value proposition is strong at 4 as well. The primary area for improvement lies in accommodation, which received a lower rating of 3.
The vast majority of reviews (around 98%) are positive, praising the program's academic rigor, international environment, and career support. A small percentage of feedback (about 2%) expressed disappointment with limited practical learning and grading fairness.
Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting good learning experiences, helpful staff, and a wide range of courses. A small percentage (4.6%) of negative feedback mentions administrative inefficiency and concerns about course relevance.
With an average rating of 4.5/5, these reviews highlight a positive student experience. The feedback praises excellent faculty, a strong curriculum, and supportive infrastructure, contributing to ~100% positive sentiment.
With an average rating of 4.73, virtually all (around ~100%) of the 64 reviews are positive. Students praise the enriching curriculum, knowledgeable faculty, and industry-relevant projects.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
With 1 review, the university has a 5/5 average rating. The single review is entirely positive, highlighting diverse student backgrounds and excellent facilities. There is no negative feedback to report.
Nothing to show
The faculty and university is good. But, if you an't to take admission in french department then take admission only if you have a keen interest in literature and history. Because this department specialises in those domains. But, if you want to explore other practical applications of language such as linguistics and translation. In that case, considering other universities is a better option. Because literature is very heavy and everybody does not has the capacity to handle all of that.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
