Nazarbayev University - NU vs Canakkale 18 March University - COMU vs Chelsea College of Art and Design vs Khoja Akhmet Yassawi University vs Al-Azhar University - Azhar

Side-by-side comparison from 64 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Nazarbayev University - NU (4.40)
Nazarbayev University - NU: wins 0/5 categories
Canakkale 18 March University - COMU: wins 1/5 categories
Chelsea College of Art and Design: wins 0/5 categories
Khoja Akhmet Yassawi University: wins 3/5 categories
Al-Azhar University - Azhar: wins 0/5 categories
International University of Tourism and Hospitality: wins 0/5 categories
UniAthena - Uniathena : wins 1/5 categories
Comparing
Astana, Kazakhstan
4.40
Top
Read more reviews
35 reviews
×
Best programme: Chemistry
Best programme: English Language and Literature
London, The United Kingdom
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Computer Engineering and Informatics
Best programme: Accounting
Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
4.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: MBA Master of Business Administration
Category ratings
Facilities
4.59
3.86
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Location
3.97
4.57
Win
Not rated
4.00
4.33
Not rated
3.00
Professors
4.45
4.29
Not rated
4.00
4.09
Not rated
5.00
Win
Internationality
4.36
3.50
Not rated
5.00
4.00
Not rated
5.00
Student life
4.58
4.15
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.30
Not rated
1.00
Value
4.52
3.79
Not rated
5.00
3.73
Not rated
5.00
Accommodation
4.63
3.71
Not rated
5.00
Win
3.80
Not rated
4.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Engaging teaching with real-world relevance
  • +Supportive and expert faculty
  • +Enriching campus life and culture
  • +Excellent campus location and facilities
  • +Supportive and helpful professors
  • +Well-organized and comprehensive courses

Nothing to show

  • +Great campus and facilities
  • +Endless opportunities and unforgettable experiences
  • +Lifelong friendships
  • +Supportive and knowledgeable professors
  • +Diverse international community and cultural exchange
  • +Practical training and relevant curriculum

Nothing to show

  • +Proactive and attentive student support
  • +Comprehensive information and personalized guidance
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from instructors is a recurring problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause confusion and frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder effective learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and student support is a recurring problem.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance detract from the learning environment.
  • -Ineffective teaching and a lack of academic support are major concerns.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment are a common complaint.
  • -Lack of clear communication and inconsistent policies frustrate students.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Facilities and resources are often outdated or insufficient.
  • -Communication from instructors and administration is poor.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution receives excellent feedback, particularly for its **Accomodation**, which is rated the highest at 4.625. **Facilities** and **Student Life** also score remarkably well, both above 4.57. Conversely, **Location** emerges as the lowest-rated aspect, with a score of 3.97. Other areas like Professors, Internationality, and Value are all rated favorably above 4.36.

This university garners its highest marks for **Location**, boasting a score of 4.57. **Professors** are also highly regarded, receiving a rating of 4.29. Conversely, **Internationality** is the area with the lowest score, at 3.5. Other aspects like Facilities, Accommodation, and Value fall in the mid-range, indicating a generally positive but not universally outstanding performance.

Nothing to show

This institution receives outstanding marks in several key areas, notably Facilities, Student Life, Accomodation, Internationality, and Value, all earning a perfect 5. Professors are rated highly at 4, representing its strongest performance alongside the excellent student experience and resources. The university also scores well for Location, with a solid 4. Its weakest area, relatively speaking, is its faculty, though still a strong rating.

This institution garners significant praise for its **location** and **student life**, both scoring above 4.3. **Professors** also receive strong marks. The university's **accommodation** stands out as a weaker area, with a rating of 3.8, and **value** is also rated somewhat lower. Facilities and internationality are rated solidly at 4.

Nothing to show

With excellent scores for its professors, internationality, and overall value, this institution demonstrates significant strengths. Accommodation also receives a commendable rating. Conversely, the university's weakest areas are its facilities and student life, both scoring very low. Location is rated moderately.

Reviews summary
Highlights

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%), with a 4.43 average rating. Students praise well-rounded education, engaging professors, lively campus life, and excellent facilities.

With an average rating of 4.19/5, approximately 93% of reviews are positive. Students praise the university's well-organized courses, supportive professors, and beautiful, functional campus. Some note that accommodation is expensive.

Nothing to show

With a 4/5 average rating and no negative feedback, this university is highly regarded. Students praise the campus and facilities, with one noting endless opportunities and an unforgettable experience.

With an average rating of 4.18/5 based on 11 reviews, ~73% highlight positive experiences. Students commend knowledgeable and supportive professors, good campus community, and a solid theoretical foundation. No negative feedback was reported.

Nothing to show

The single review is positive, highlighting consistent follow-up and helpful assistance. Students appreciate the proactive and informative support they receive.

Rating distribution
5★
46%
31%
0%
0%
45%
0%
0%
4★
51%
56%
0%
100%
27%
0%
100%
3★
3%
13%
0%
0%
27%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Master of Public Administration

I am a graduate of Master in Public Administration, year of 2019. The program was amazing as well as academic team of the School of Public Policy. The program is designed for working professionals with various backgrounds and interests which makes this program unique. Your groupmates are going to be from different age groups and work environments, but they will all share the same goal of succeeding in their career as well as sharpening their skills. Also this kind of diverse environment gives you a great chance to learn about other’s experiences and grasp an opinion on how dilemmas in civil service or public policy are solved in their organizations and companies. Professor’s were great from the very first day, and became our friends by the end of the program. All the books and materials used were in compliance with the international best practices and this opinion comes from a person who did his bachelor’s in California back in 2015. If you are seeking for a program that can challenge your professionalism do not hesitate to apply for this program or choose NU as your next place to start your studies.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close