London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE vs ONCAMPUS Global vs University of Cumbria vs London Academy of Trading - LAT vs London School of Business & Finance - LSBF
Side-by-side comparison from 358 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Knowledgeable and approachable faculty
- +High-quality academic programs and clear feedback
- +Excellent facilities and resources
- +Supportive and approachable teachers
- +Excellent student support services
- +Convenient campus location and facilities
- +Practical, career-focused programs and employability emphasis
- +Supportive and motivating teaching staff
- +Enjoyable study environment and facilities
- +Supportive and knowledgeable tutors
- +Engaging daily webinars with market analysis
- +Improved trading profitability and understanding
- +Practical, real-world focused learning
- +High-quality, supportive faculty
- +Applied business and marketing curriculum
- +Accessible resources and user-friendly website
- +Positive learning environment and supportive teachers
- +Strong professional development and career opportunities
- +Diverse teaching styles from various tutors
- +Flexibility and adaptability fostered by module changes
- -Poor teaching quality and unstructured courses.
- -High fees combined with lack of support and career services.
- -Limited social life and judgmental environment.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are prevalent.
- -Inefficient administrative processes and lack of clear communication are frustrating.
- -Limited resources and support for academic needs are a concern.
- -Administrative & management issues cause frequent frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning experiences.
- -Course content and teaching quality often fall short of expectations.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of engagement and uninspired teaching methods are disliked.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a significant concern.
- -Administrative issues and lack of support create frustration.
- -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant and lacking practical application.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment are a common complaint.
- -Lack of clear communication and transparency exacerbates problems.
- -Inefficient administrative and communication processes.
- -Poorly maintained and outdated facilities.
- -Lack of engaging and relevant teaching.
Examining the university's performance reveals a diverse set of scores. The strongest areas are **Internationality** and **Location**, both receiving very high marks. **Student Life** stands out as the weakest performing category. Other areas like **Professors**, **Accomodation**, and **Facilities** received solid, above-average ratings, with **Value** also scoring positively.
This institution garners strong approval across multiple aspects, with particularly high marks for its **Professors (4.76)** and **Location (4.75)**. Student life and internationality also score well, above 4.5. **Accommodations (4.35)** received the lowest rating, though still generally positive, while facilities and value demonstrate solid, above-average performance.
With a standout score for professors, this institution clearly excels in academic instruction. Conversely, facilities present the lowest-rated aspect. Other areas like location and accommodation are well-regarded, suggesting a generally positive student experience, though student life scores are moderate. Internationality and value also receive favorable marks.
Across numerous metrics, this institution demonstrates exceptional strengths. Facilities, professors, location, student life, and internationality all garnered perfect scores, indicating outstanding offerings in these domains. The sole area falling slightly short, though still very strong, is accommodation at 4.5 stars, suggesting a minor area for potential enhancement compared to its otherwise flawless performance.
This institution boasts exceptional strengths in its **professors**, **location**, and **internationality**, all receiving perfect scores. Student life is also highly regarded, with a rating of 4. However, its **accommodation** stands out as a significant weakness, scoring a 0, indicating a critical area for improvement. Facilities and value for money are rated moderately well at 3 and 4 respectively.
With outstanding scores in nearly every aspect, this institution excels in its facilities, professors, location, accommodation, internationality, and overall value, all receiving perfect marks. However, a significant area for improvement is evident in student life, which received the lowest possible rating, indicating a substantial deficit in this crucial category.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in its teaching staff and international student experience, both receiving top marks. Its facilities, location, student life, and accommodation are also highly regarded, all scoring a solid four out of five. While value for money is also rated at a perfect five, the professors and internationality stand out as the university's most impressive attributes.
Approximately 96.6% of reviews are positive, praising knowledgeable professors, supportive learning environments, and strong academic reputations. A small percentage (around 3.4%) of negative feedback cites issues with lecturing, grading, and course structure.
All 21 reviews are positive, averaging 4.76/5 stars. Students frequently praised helpful teachers, strong academic support, and good facilities. Some also highlighted a positive transition experience and newfound confidence.
Most reviews are highly positive, rating the university 4.5/5. Students praise practical, career-focused programs, supportive staff, and appealing campuses. No negative feedback was recorded.
Both reviews are highly positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Key highlights include excellent tutors, engaging daily webinars, and improved trading profitability. Students appreciated the supportive learning environment that clarified market understanding.
With a 4/5 average rating and 100% positive feedback, students highlight practical programs and good teachers. Limited negative comments, around 0%, mention a lack of dissertation support.
With an average rating of 5/5, 100% of reviews are positive. Students praise the university experience and CIMA's support, describing it as a dream come true.
The single review is highly positive, giving a 5/5 rating. This suggests overwhelmingly positive feedback, with approximately 0% negative sentiment. The reviewer appreciated the flexibility offered by having different tutors per module.
LSE is a great place to create life-long connections and friends. There's a certain sense of community that is special to the university. The staff are hands-on and approachable. The facilities are modern and well-equipped.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
It was a dream come true, I wanted to become a CIMA member which I achieved in 2015, the thing I like their support very user friendly website, the thing I dislike is the Merger with AICPA, as it seems like for most members it is not a merger but a take over. All in all I am happy to be a member in this Esteem Management Accountancy body.
Nothing to show
