King's College London vs London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE vs University of Greenwich - UoG vs Kingston University - KU vs Istituto Marangoni
Side-by-side comparison from 729 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Supportive professors and valuable, practical courses
- +Diverse international community and vibrant student life
- +Academic excellence and empowering environment
- +Knowledgeable and approachable faculty
- +High-quality academic programs and clear feedback
- +Excellent facilities and resources
- +Supportive faculty and staff
- +Welcoming and vibrant campus environment
- +Diverse student community
- +Engaging and supportive faculty.
- +Practical, real-world focused curriculum.
- +Vibrant campus life and location.
- +Global fashion hub and career opportunities
- +Inspiring teachers and valuable learning experiences
- +Practical industry-focused learning and skill development
- +Passionate and knowledgeable teaching staff
- +Useful facilities for musicians
- +Exceptional teaching quality from passionate, experienced instructors
- +Unmatched precision, emphasis on quality, and professional skill development
- +Welcoming environment, strong support, and valuable alumni network
- -High tuition fees for international students disproportionately fund real estate rather than academic resources.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of essential resources are a significant concern.
- -Administrative and management issues create significant frustration for students.
- -Poor teaching quality and unstructured courses.
- -High fees combined with lack of support and career services.
- -Limited social life and judgmental environment.
- -Disorganized management and administrative issues.
- -Poor quality teaching from some lecturers.
- -Negative impact of strikes and poor value for money.
- -Administrative & management issues, including a lack of student support and disorganization.
- -Inexperienced teachers and professors who seem uncaring about student progress.
- -Lack of resources and scattered course structure negatively impact learning.
- -Administrative and management issues create confusion and frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Communication breakdowns and lack of transparency are significant problems.
- -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of essential resources are a recurring problem.
- -Course content and teaching methods are often perceived as irrelevant or poor quality.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are disappointing.
- -The curriculum feels irrelevant and disconnected from real-world needs.
This institution excels notably in its **Location**, receiving a high rating, and also scores very well in **Internationality**. The **Facilities** and **Professors** also show strong performance. Conversely, **Accomodation** received the lowest marks, suggesting it's an area for potential improvement. **Student Life** and **Value** fall in the mid-range, indicating a generally positive but not outstanding experience in those aspects.
Examining the university's performance reveals a diverse set of scores. The strongest areas are **Internationality** and **Location**, both receiving very high marks. **Student Life** stands out as the weakest performing category. Other areas like **Professors**, **Accomodation**, and **Facilities** received solid, above-average ratings, with **Value** also scoring positively.
This university garners impressive scores in several key areas. Its strongest points are Internationality and Location, both exceeding 4.5. Professors also receive high marks. Accommodations, however, present the weakest area with a rating of 3.85. Overall, the institution demonstrates a well-rounded offering with strong performance in student experience and its surroundings.
Internationality stands out as the highest-rated aspect, reflecting a strong global presence. Facilities and professors also received commendable scores. Conversely, accommodation presents the weakest area, scoring considerably lower than other categories. Student life and value for money fall within a moderate range, with location also performing well but not reaching the highest tiers.
This institution shines particularly brightly in its **Location** and **Internationality**, both receiving excellent scores. **Professors** and **Value** also stand out as strong points. Conversely, the **Facilities** represent the weakest area, scoring considerably lower than other aspects. **Student Life** and **Accomodation** fall in the mid-range, indicating areas for potential improvement but also solid performance.
This institution demonstrates considerable strengths in several key areas. Location receives the highest commendation, followed closely by Facilities, Professors, and Internationality, all scoring very well. Student Life offers a solid experience. However, Accommodations represent a significant weakness, significantly impacting the overall perception. Value is rated moderately.
This university demonstrates exceptional strength in its **location** (4.7), **professors** (4.6), and **internationality** (4.6). Students are particularly impressed with the quality of instruction and the global environment. Conversely, **accommodation** stands out as the lowest-rated area at 3.0, suggesting room for improvement in this aspect. Student life and value for money also received moderate scores.
With a 4.16/5 average, ~99.6% of reviews are positive, highlighting supportive professors, interesting courses, and a vibrant international community. A small amount of negative feedback points to misleading degree focus and administrative slowness.
Approximately 96.6% of reviews are positive, praising knowledgeable professors, supportive learning environments, and strong academic reputations. A small percentage (around 3.4%) of negative feedback cites issues with lecturing, grading, and course structure.
The vast majority of reviews are positive (~90%), praising the green campus, helpful faculty, and strong community. A small percentage (~1.5%) reported negative experiences, citing issues with organization and lecturers.
The vast majority of reviews (~74%) highlight Kingston University's strong learning environment, knowledgeable lecturers, and relevant course content. A small percentage (~2.5%) of feedback mentioned issues with management and resources.
With a 3.67 average rating, positive feedback (~33%) highlights fashion business opportunities and inspiring teachers. No negative reviews were provided.
All three student reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.33/5. Recurring themes include strong learning experiences in music industry skills and passionate teachers.
Students highly praise the exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable instructors. Facilities are noted as impeccable and the learning environment welcoming, contributing to professional and personal growth for ~100% of reviewers.
Versatile degree with many potential teaching pathways and career options. However a degree focused a lot on social studies rather than culture and media. There should be more of a focus on this given the degree title, making it seem a bit misleading.
LSE is a great place to create life-long connections and friends. There's a certain sense of community that is special to the university. The staff are hands-on and approachable. The facilities are modern and well-equipped.
Nothing to show
The course and it's syllabus can be super interesting and fun but most of the lecturers are trash. They show no enthusiasm to teach and deliver lectures as if they were eulogies. Which is a shame, I feel the only thing holding back KU is the lack of enthusiasm.
I like a lot of it but I feel like the subject teaches us the same every time. There should be more diversity in our contents and make us work more in groups and do more exercises in class, in order words the classes should be more dynamic
Everything is great. The teachers are passionate about teaching, and the facilities are very useful for musicians. The only thing is that I'm not sure if it was worth it to pay for the degree, in terms of value and career prospect.
I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.
