King's College London vs London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE vs Brunel University London vs SOAS University of London vs The Institute of Contemporary Music Performance - ICMP
Side-by-side comparison from 768 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Supportive professors and academic excellence
- +Vibrant student life and diverse international community
- +Strong balance of theory and practical application
- +Expert, approachable faculty and high-quality teaching
- +Strong career preparation and marketable skills development
- +Excellent facilities and a supportive learning environment
- +Practical, career-focused learning with industry relevance
- +Supportive and engaging teaching staff
- +Accessible campus and useful resources
- +Diverse and inclusive community.
- +Global perspectives and academic rigor.
- +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty.
- +Practical industry-focused learning and skill development
- +Passionate and knowledgeable teaching staff
- +Useful facilities for musicians
- +Exceptional teaching quality from passionate, experienced instructors
- +Unmatched precision, emphasis on quality, and professional skill development
- +Welcoming environment, strong support, and valuable alumni network
- +International relevance & practical/hands-on experience
- +Welcoming & supportive environment with friendly, helpful staff/faculty
- +Diverse, small classes with experienced professors
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant problem.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of investment in them are disappointing.
- -High tuition fees are not perceived as being reflected in the quality of education or resources.
- -Poor teaching quality and unclear learning expectations.
- -Lack of structure and significant workload.
- -Disappointing careers service and limited social life.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant concern.
- -Outdated course content and confusing teaching methods are frustrating.
- -Poor communication and lack of professionalism are prevalent.
- -Poor administrative support and communication lead to unresolved issues.
- -Lack of adequate support services and advice negatively impacts student well-being and finances.
- -Uncommunicated changes and issues with departmental structure cause significant disruption.
- -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of essential resources are a recurring problem.
- -Course content and teaching methods are often perceived as irrelevant or poor quality.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are disappointing.
- -The curriculum feels irrelevant and disconnected from real-world needs.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are often criticized.
- -Poor teaching quality and unengaging course content are commonly cited.
The university garners excellent scores in several key areas, notably excelling in Location with a rating of 4.82 and Internationality at 4.62. Facilities and Professors also received strong marks. Conversely, Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, rated at 3.56. Value and Student Life are rated moderately well, indicating areas for potential improvement.
This institution demonstrates remarkable strengths in its **Internationality** and **Location**, both receiving scores nearing 4.8. **Professors** also score highly at 4.26. Conversely, **Student Life** is the lowest-rated area, with a score of 3.64, followed by **Accomodation** at 3.79. Other aspects like Facilities and Value fall within a solid mid-range.
This institution garners a strong overall rating, particularly excelling in **Internationality** with a score of 4.33. **Professors** and **Value** also receive high marks. Conversely, **Accomodation** and **Location** present the weakest areas, scoring 3.61 and 3.72 respectively. Facilities, student life, and professors all fall within a commendable 3.8 to 4.0 range.
This university garners high marks, particularly excelling in its prime **location**, which received a near-perfect score. **Internationality** and **Student Life** also stand out positively. Conversely, **Accommodations** present the lowest-rated aspect. Other areas like **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Value** are generally rated well, indicating a solid overall offering with specific strengths and one area for potential improvement.
This institution demonstrates considerable strengths in several key areas. Location receives the highest commendation, followed closely by Facilities, Professors, and Internationality, all scoring very well. Student Life offers a solid experience. However, Accommodations represent a significant weakness, significantly impacting the overall perception. Value is rated moderately.
This university demonstrates exceptional strength in its **location** (4.7), **professors** (4.6), and **internationality** (4.6). Students are particularly impressed with the quality of instruction and the global environment. Conversely, **accommodation** stands out as the lowest-rated area at 3.0, suggesting room for improvement in this aspect. Student life and value for money also received moderate scores.
Student feedback indicates strong satisfaction across several aspects of university life. Location stands out as the highest-rated area, with internationality and professors also receiving excellent marks. While student life and value are also highly regarded, facilities represent the weakest area among the surveyed categories. Overall, the institution demonstrates a solid performance with clear strengths in its external and academic offerings.
With ~74% positive reviews and an average rating of 4.16/5, students highlight versatile degrees, supportive professors, and a vibrant international community. A very small amount of feedback noted administrative slowness and a degree focus not matching its title.
Nearly 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting a supportive environment, knowledgeable faculty, and excellent facilities. A small percentage (around 3.4%) mention issues like poor lecturing, inconsistent grading, and lack of social life.
Over 97% of reviews are positive, highlighting career-focused degrees, practical learning, and supportive lecturers. A small amount of negative feedback mentions visa issues and course content clarity.
~76% of 34 reviews are positive, praising global perspectives, diverse community, and supportive professors. A small percentage of negative feedback (approximately 5.9%) mentions issues with administrative support and communication.
All three student reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.33/5. Recurring themes include strong learning experiences in music industry skills and passionate teachers.
Students highly praise the exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable instructors. Facilities are noted as impeccable and the learning environment welcoming, contributing to professional and personal growth for ~100% of reviewers.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~95% of feedback highlighting an engaging, internationally relevant learning experience and a welcoming environment. Students appreciate practical learning, helpful staff, and international class settings. No negative feedback was recorded.
Versatile degree with many potential teaching pathways and career options. However a degree focused a lot on social studies rather than culture and media. There should be more of a focus on this given the degree title, making it seem a bit misleading.
LSE is a great place to create life-long connections and friends. There's a certain sense of community that is special to the university. The staff are hands-on and approachable. The facilities are modern and well-equipped.
Nothing to show
I am originally from the USA but decided to pursue my Masters degree in London. My university has a large diverse community of students. I was able to thrive in this environment as I was accepted for being myself. I am Proud to be a SOAS graduate.
Everything is great. The teachers are passionate about teaching, and the facilities are very useful for musicians. The only thing is that I'm not sure if it was worth it to pay for the degree, in terms of value and career prospect.
I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.
First of all since my campus was in the heart of Rome, the place and inside of the university was like a whole museum. I love how friendly and helpful the staff was, the professors were one in a million. I love how they did all their best to tell us about the subjects in detail and in a fun way with examples for us to get into it more. I liked how they make time and engage in it and actually help us to teach us, so it was all in one reading writing with our own brain and infos searching for the sources by ourselves listening but also being able to express our own way of knowledge on the topics!
