EU Business School vs SBS Swiss Business School vs EHL Hospitality Business School - EHL vs BHMS Business & Hotel Management School - B.H.M.S vs Rushford Business School
Side-by-side comparison from 323 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Diverse international environment and networking opportunities
- +Knowledgeable and experienced professors with practical insights
- +Innovative and engaging business programs
- +Diverse and international student body and learning environment
- +Engaging and adventurous learning experiences
- +Strong focus on practical business skills and international management
- +Strong academic programs blending hospitality and business.
- +Abundant opportunities and supportive environment.
- +Welcoming student community and personal development focus.
- +International environment and diverse cultures
- +Practical, hands-on learning and industry connections
- +Supportive and approachable lecturers
- +Flexible study schedules and diverse themes
- +High-quality faculty with global perspectives
- +Relevant MBA programs for career advancement
- +Dual degrees and career foundation
- +Reputable programs with practical experience
- +Internship opportunities and networking
- +Practical, interdisciplinary teaching
- +Pleasant atmosphere with lecturers and students
- +Good cafeteria food options
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -The quality of education and teaching is often perceived as basic and unengaging.
- -Facilities and academic support are frequently criticized as inadequate.
- -Administrative & management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a consistent complaint.
- -Communication breakdowns and poor support services are frequently mentioned.
- -Disorganized and uncommunicative administration.
- -Poorly maintained and outdated facilities.
- -Lack of responsiveness from staff and instructors.
- -Poor staff attitude and a lack of care for students are significant issues.
- -Unfulfilled promises and misleading information create a negative student experience.
- -Inadequate facilities and miserable conditions contribute to dissatisfaction.
- -Lack of promised support and opportunities.
- -Poor post-enrollment communication.
- -Chaotic and inconsistent schedules disrupt learning.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities are a recurring problem.
- -Material is not fully in English and local students are insular.
- -Teachers lack enthusiasm and suggest inadequate translation tools.
- -The program has too many minor subjects, hindering focus on core learning.
This institution demonstrates particular strengths in its **Location** and **Internationality**, both scoring very highly. **Student Life** and **Facilities** also received positive marks. Conversely, **Accomodation** emerged as the weakest area, indicating room for improvement. **Professors** and **Value** fall within a moderate range, suggesting a generally positive but not exceptional experience in these aspects.
This institution demonstrates exceptional performance, with a perfect score of 5 across all evaluated aspects. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and perceived value all received top marks. Consequently, there are no distinct weak areas; the university appears to excel uniformly in every surveyed category, indicating a consistently high-quality experience for its students.
This institution garners exceptional ratings, particularly for its **Internationality**, which stands out at 4.93. Facilities and Student Life also score highly, both above 4.7. Accommodation and Value are similarly strong. Professors and Location receive solid scores, though slightly lower than other categories. The university demonstrates a well-rounded profile with a distinct strength in its global appeal and a consistently positive experience for students.
This institution receives its highest marks for Location, with a perfect score. Student Life and Internationality are also strong areas, both scoring above 4.0. Conversely, Value for Money is the lowest-rated aspect, followed by Facilities and Professors, which also received moderate scores. Accommodations fall in the middle range of ratings.
This institution receives excellent marks, with its **Facilities** standing out as the strongest area, earning a perfect 5. **Professors** also garner high praise at 4.9. **Student Life**, while still strong, is the relatively weakest aspect with a score of 4.4. The university demonstrates a solid all-around performance with high ratings in location, accommodation, internationality, and value.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its academic offerings and global reach. Professors received a perfect score of 5, and its internationality is highly rated at 4.67. The university also scores well in location (4.5) and accommodation (4.33). Facilities and student life both earned a solid 4. Conversely, the value proposition is the weakest area, with a rating of 3.67.
This institution excels in its **Location** and **Accomodation**, both scoring a strong 4.5 and 4 respectively. The **Professors** and **Student Life** also receive a solid 3.5. However, **Facilities** and **Internationality** present areas for improvement, each receiving a lower rating of 2.5. The university offers good **Value** at 4.
Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting diverse networks, knowledgeable professors, and an engaging international environment. A small percentage of feedback (~7.7%) notes disorganization and basic education.
With a perfect 5/5 average rating, the sole review highlights an excellent international vibe and engaging learning experience in a Business Administration degree. There are no negative reviews.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%), with an average rating of 4.76/5. Students highlight excellent curriculum, ample opportunities, and strong institutional support. There is no negative feedback reported.
About 78% of reviews are positive, highlighting the international environment, practical approach, industry connections, and supportive lecturers. Two reviews (about 22%) express dissatisfaction with staff rudeness and perceived broken promises.
Nearly all reviews are positive, praising program flexibility, diverse themes, and supportive faculty. A small percentage of feedback mentions unfulfilled promises and poor communication.
University reviews are mixed, with ~67% positive and ~33% negative. Positive feedback highlights career foundation, dual degrees, and practical experience. Some negative comments mention scheduling issues.
With an average rating of 3/5, university student feedback is split evenly. Positive comments highlight practical teaching and a pleasant atmosphere, while negative points focus on limited space and international student integration challenges.
Although I earned my bachelor degree at the University of York in UK, it was quite theoretical. I really started to bridge the learning gap between theory and practice only when I started to pursue my master degree in Business Analytics and Data Science at EU Business School in Barcelona. What stands out most in my current program is the university’s strong emphasis on practical experience. Our professors are not only scholars but also are successful business managers and data experts, as they are either the owners of successful organizations or individuals who took on top management roles in large corporations. Their teachings are more than just the syllabus in, they also provide personal experience in the area of niche markets, provide best practices in an industry, and always provoke our thinking with regard to the existing trends in higher education, business strategy, and innovation.
I've been meaning to share this incredible journey I've been on at SBS Barcelona, and honestly, it's been a wild ride. Currently knee-deep in my Business Administration degree with a spicy focus on International Management, and let me tell you, SBS knows how to make learning an adventure. First off, the whole international vibe is off the charts. My classmates are like a mini United Nations, and getting to know different cultures has been eye-opening. It's not just about textbooks here; it's about learning the nitty-gritty of how business works on a global scale. The professors? More like business wizards meets friendly mentors. They don't just teach; they share their war stories from the business battlefield. You feel like they're genuinely rooting for you to succeed, which makes the whole learning thing a lot less intimidating. But what's a great university without a bit of innovation, right? SBS Barcelona takes it to the next level. We're not just stuck in classrooms; we're out there in the real world. Internships, research projects, rubbing shoulders with industry hotshots – it's like they're prepping us for the business Olympics.
Choosing EHL was a very intentional decision for me. As an extroverted person passionate about hospitality, I wanted a university where service excellence is not only taught but truly practiced. EHL stood out because of its balance between academic rigor and hands-on experience. The AP (preparatory year) program had a big impact on me. Working in operational roles such as fine dining service, front office, pastry taught me discipline, attention to detail, and how to perform under pressure. It gave me real confidence in guest interaction and teamwork. Academically, I especially enjoyed classes related to financial accounting and economics as they helped me better understand how people and businesses function together. EHL’s career support also made a real difference. The interview preparation and guidance helped me secure my Front Office internship at Jumeirah Marsa Al Arab, which was a major opportunity for me. What makes EHL distinctive is its international environment and high standards. You’re constantly surrounded by ambitious, driven students, which pushes me to grow both personally and professionally. My advice to future students is to fully embrace the operational experience; it builds resilience and professionalism that truly sets you apart.
To be honest compared to other universities BHMS did not strike me as a great choice in the first place. However, the 2 semesters per year, where in the first one you study and in the second one you do an internship is a really great way of learning. I have gotten great opportunities and met many people here. I would like to highlight my professor; Mr. Marcel Enzler. He is an amazing lecturer who truly believes in his students and also tries to elevate the school to the best of his abilities. After doing my studies here for 3 years, I would like to see them make the first and second year curriculum fit the industry requirements and standards. Because they are very easy courses and once you are in third year you start struggling a lot. Other than that I immensely enjoyed my time here.
I regret choosing Rushford Business School for my MBA. Despite detailed discussions and assurances from its president, Syed Tufail, none of the promised support or opportunities were delivered. Communication after enrollment was extremely poor, and the overall experience did not meet expectations. Sharing this to help others make informed decisions.
Usually I trust reviews and they have never let me down, until 2023, when I chose to continue the bsc culinary course at this place. I wish someone told me this before my “study” there. First, I couldn’t get my proper classes schedule for 3 weeks. When the schedule finally came, it was chaotic, with daily kitchen duties overlapping with theoretical classes (By the way, I have No complaints about most of the theoretical classes, they were rare for culinary students but to the point and interesting - the only one plus). The kitchen duties were overwhelming, covering 24 days a month, and I almost never had the chance to attend a practical cooking class or even write down a single recipe, as all practical part was under MIT - people who working for HTMI as volunteers to get 1 year Swiss visa. These MIT used to talk with me very badly and always gave the task to clean or bring/peal for them vegetables, they directly told us that culinary students here to work, not enjoy their study. There was no culinary instructor for my course. And almost every event on Friday for students I had to be all day in the kitchen to cook for HTMI and after clean kitchen. I felt like I was working as a servant at the school, preparing meals and performing tasks for the kitchen MIT. The quality of the food was poor, sometimes even totally vegetarian days, and everything was prepared by the students, with the exception of desserts. Desserts were prepared with pastry students, but even pastry chef visits to the main kitchen were rare, and his desserts plating was outdated (like previous century, no one plate this way now in fine dining restaurants. Anyway, at least one teacher whom I sometimes even had to beg to attend his classes instead of “learning” how to clean kitchen and steam rice from MIT) They even taught us to plate dishes in a clock style 🤣) In the event planning class, we were expected to find our sponsors to organize an event as a part of the study, which forced us to seek support from local hotels and supermarkets, couldn’t really do it… They also forgot to give me my iPad in the beginning, when I asked, they say I’m trying to cheat them. I also had to pay my insurance twice. I was hoping on internship, but even that was below then Macdonalds level, i had to prepare sandwiches and salads for hotel staff, HTMI career center that time stoped replying my emails.. The experience was so depressing that I had to take antidepressants to cope with the stress. I strongly recommend that parents of prospective students look elsewhere in Switzerland and avoid these scams. I’m also attaching pictures from our “culinary classes” with MIT and accordingly the same food that was given to the students for 3500 franks per 12 weeks. Thank you for the attention 🙏🏼
What I liked: -Sustainable concerns of the school -Partnership with Social Education University in order to deliver social related modules What I didn't like while being registered to an international program: -Some material modules are still in German, some teachers suggested to translate them on Deepl -Local students are not very open-minded... tend to create their own circles and don't include international students -Even though the program is supposed to be taught in English, more minors are given in German than in English, which reduces the minors choices to 3 only... To improve: -Class materials and/or explanations can be given in English even though the student asked a question in Swiss-German (more inclusive) -More inclusive events, even though students can not be forced to take part in them, help international students to be included by locals Recommend? : I do not think that I would recommend international students to study there. I studied one year in Geneva, and the international program there is more inclusive than the one in Lucerne.
