EU Business School vs University of Zurich - UZH vs INSEEC Business School vs BHMS Business & Hotel Management School - B.H.M.S vs Alfred Nobel Open Business School
Side-by-side comparison from 276 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Industry expert professors and practical, real-world application focus
- +Strong emphasis on out-of-class learning and hands-on experience
- +Vibrant campus life and diverse international student community
- +Welcoming and inclusive environment for all students
- +Supportive and dedicated professors
- +Effective and enjoyable learning facilities and resources
- +Practical, group-focused learning and professional initiation.
- +High-quality teaching and supportive faculty mentorship.
- +Strong professional network and vibrant student life.
- +International environment and diverse cultures
- +Practical, hands-on learning and industry connections
- +Supportive faculty and staff
- +Engaging, real-world focused professors and interactive learning
- +Opportunities for practical application and recognition through competitions
- +Personal growth and boosted confidence
Nothing to show
- +Practical, interdisciplinary teaching
- +Pleasant atmosphere with lecturers and students
- +Good cafeteria food options
- -Disorganized administration and unhelpful staff lead to constant confusion.
- -Poor educational quality, including basic courses and insufficient study facilities.
- -Lack of accreditation and business-like focus detract from educational value.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are major concerns.
- -Lack of administrative support and unclear communication cause frustration.
- -Course content is often irrelevant or not up-to-date with industry standards.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance.
- -Lack of student support and responsiveness from administration.
- -Uninspiring curriculum and teaching methods.
- -Unfriendly and unhelpful staff create a negative experience.
- -Promises made by the school are not kept.
- -Poor living conditions and misleading fee practices cause student dissatisfaction.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment detract from the learning experience.
- -Limited career support and job placement opportunities are a major concern.
Nothing to show
- -Material is not fully in English and local students are insular.
- -Teachers lack enthusiasm and suggest inadequate translation tools.
- -The program has too many minor subjects, hindering focus on core learning.
With a robust score of 4.69, **Location** stands out as the university's strongest asset, closely followed by its high **Internationality** rating of 4.68. Conversely, **Accomodation** emerges as the lowest-rated category at 3.44. Other areas like Facilities (4.03), Student Life (4.14), Professors (3.97), and Value (3.86) fall within a moderate to good range, indicating a generally positive but uneven performance across different aspects.
This institution receives strong marks across most surveyed areas. Location and Facilities stand out with the highest ratings, indicating these are particular strengths. Student Life is the lowest-rated aspect, suggesting room for improvement in this domain. Other key areas like Professors, Accomodation, Internationality, and Value are all rated positively, reflecting a generally well-regarded university experience.
This university demonstrates notable strengths in its **Location**, receiving a high rating of 4.64. **Student Life** and **Internationality** are also well-regarded. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a significantly lower score of 2.5. Other aspects like **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Value** fall within a moderate to good range.
The university demonstrates exceptional strengths in its **Location**, receiving a perfect score. Student life and facilities also stand out with high marks. Conversely, the **Value** for money is its lowest-rated aspect. Other areas like professors, accommodation, and internationality fall within a solid, respectable range, indicating a generally positive but not perfect experience.
Remarkably, this institution achieves top scores in several key areas. Its strongest aspects are Professors and Internationality, both earning a perfect 5. Facilities, Location, Student Life, Accomodation, and Value are also highly rated at 4. The only area not explicitly detailed is the weakest, but the consistent high marks suggest a well-rounded university experience.
Nothing to show
This institution excels in its **Location** and **Accomodation**, both scoring a strong 4.5 and 4 respectively. The **Professors** and **Student Life** also receive a solid 3.5. However, **Facilities** and **Internationality** present areas for improvement, each receiving a lower rating of 2.5. The university offers good **Value** at 4.
Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting industry expert professors, practical applications, and vibrant campus life. A smaller ~8% of feedback points to disorganization and basic course content.
All 34 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.09/5. Students highlight welcoming environments, enjoyable student life, and effective facilities. Professors are often described as helpful and committed.
Most student feedback is positive (~63% 4-5 stars), highlighting excellent pedagogy, practical experiences, and supportive staff. The average rating is 3.81/5, with no negative reviews.
~63% of reviews are positive, highlighting the international environment, practical approach, and industry connections. A smaller ~25% of feedback is negative, mentioning rude staff interactions and unmet promises.
With a 5/5 average rating from one review, approximately 100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight inspiring professors, interactive classes, and significant personal growth.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 3/5, university student feedback is split evenly. Positive comments highlight practical teaching and a pleasant atmosphere, while negative points focus on limited space and international student integration challenges.
I love to take a path in a good environment to perform my ability to intend all the perspective that matches and are suitable for every student in daily lifestyle and work in a way which will be helpful for the needs or students to get higher oppurtuinitied
Known for outstanding education, the university offers rigorous academic programs and innovative teaching methods. The campus features modern architecture and a vibrant community atmosphere that stimulates intellectual curiosity. Professors are committed to student success and provide mentorship, while state-of-the-art amenities support academic research and collaboration. Comfortable on-campus accommodation enhances the student experience.
This university has a lot of qualities such as adapting to students in order to optimize learning, and the desire to confront the student as quickly as possible with the world of work. On the other hand, I would criticize this school for poorly disseminated information and a gloomy community life.
Unfortunately I’m an Alumni of BHMS and I was met by a very rude person when I went to inquire about placement programs ! This man used a very condescending tone ! He was rude ! and very snappy! I’m very ashamed that I went to this school and upon coming back I experienced the horror that other students once talked about a very rude student working at the desk. You’d think we're taught to meet people with kindness being a hospitality school! Shame on you
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
What I liked: -Sustainable concerns of the school -Partnership with Social Education University in order to deliver social related modules What I didn't like while being registered to an international program: -Some material modules are still in German, some teachers suggested to translate them on Deepl -Local students are not very open-minded... tend to create their own circles and don't include international students -Even though the program is supposed to be taught in English, more minors are given in German than in English, which reduces the minors choices to 3 only... To improve: -Class materials and/or explanations can be given in English even though the student asked a question in Swiss-German (more inclusive) -More inclusive events, even though students can not be forced to take part in them, help international students to be included by locals Recommend? : I do not think that I would recommend international students to study there. I studied one year in Geneva, and the international program there is more inclusive than the one in Lucerne.
