Clark Atlanta University - CAUB vs Hamad bin Khalifa University vs University of Iceland - HÍ vs Vellore Institute of Technology - VIT vs Reykjavik University - RU

Side-by-side comparison from 42 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Northwest University, Kano (4.50)
Clark Atlanta University - CAUB: wins 3/7 categories
Hamad bin Khalifa University: wins 0/7 categories
University of Iceland - HÍ: wins 2/7 categories
Vellore Institute of Technology - VIT: wins 1/7 categories
Reykjavik University - RU: wins 0/7 categories
Universidad Católica de Santa Fe: wins 0/7 categories
Northwest University, Kano: wins 1/7 categories
Comparing
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
4.00
Read more reviews
27 reviews
×
Best programme: Business
Best programme: Communication and Public Relations
Best programme: Mechanical Engineering
Reykjavik, Iceland
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Education
Category ratings
Facilities
3.88
Not rated
3.50
4.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Location
4.26
Win
Not rated
4.00
2.82
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Professors
4.56
Win
Not rated
4.00
3.36
Not rated
Not rated
4.50
Internationality
3.63
Not rated
4.50
Win
4.09
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Student life
4.38
Win
Not rated
3.50
3.55
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Value
4.30
Not rated
3.50
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
4.50
Win
Accommodation
3.88
Not rated
4.00
Win
3.55
Not rated
Not rated
2.50
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Empowering atmosphere and strong sense of community
  • +Excellent professors and approachable faculty support
  • +Opportunities for involvement and personal growth

Nothing to show

  • +Strong practical and hands-on learning experiences.
  • +High quality of higher education.
  • +Expert, approachable faculty and strong academic programs
  • +Good balance of study, extracurriculars, and campus life
  • +Modern infrastructure, safety, and international opportunities

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Supportive and caring staff and administration
  • +Encouraging academic experience and effective teachers
  • +Conducive learning atmosphere
Cons
  • -None of the provided reviews express negative sentiment or highlight aspects that students appreciate the least.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequently criticized.
  • -Communication and transparency from the institution are lacking.
  • -Overcrowding and poor academic support lead to high failure rates.
  • -Remote location detracts from campus life.
  • -Faculty lack teaching effectiveness and engagement.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent complaint.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are often mentioned.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
Rating summary
What students say

This university receives its highest marks for its Professors, with an impressive 4.56 rating. Student Life also scores well at 4.38, closely followed by Value at 4.30. Conversely, Internationality is its weakest area, rated at 3.63. Facilities and Accomodation are moderately rated, both around 3.88.

Nothing to show

This institution demonstrates particular strength in its **Internationality**, receiving a high rating of 4.5. Other well-regarded aspects include **Professors**, **Location**, and **Accomodation**, all scoring a solid 4. Conversely, **Facilities** and **Student Life** are areas with the lowest scores, both at 3.5, suggesting room for improvement in these domains.

This institution receives commendation for its **Facilities** and **Value**, both scoring a strong 4. **Internationality** also stands out with the highest rating at 4.09. Conversely, the **Location** received the lowest score, averaging 2.82. **Professors**, **Student Life**, and **Accommodation** are rated moderately well, falling between 3.36 and 3.55.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

The university demonstrates significant strengths in its academic offerings and campus environment. Professors receive an excellent rating of 4.5, closely followed by strong scores for Value (4.5) and Student Life (4). Internationality also scores well at 4. The weakest area of concern is Accommodation, with a rating of 2.5, while Facilities and Location are rated moderately at 3.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Most reviews praise growth opportunities, empowering atmosphere, and excellent professors. A small percentage of feedback notes concerns with campus safety. The average rating is 4.04 out of 5.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4/5, reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students highlight practical work and the university's quality. A minor concern involves mandatory Icelandic subjects in some specializations.

Around 55% of reviews praise exceptional faculty, practical knowledge, and good industry connections. A small portion, ~9%, mentions overcrowding, academic pressure, and faculty not meeting expectations.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With a 4.5/5 average rating from 2 reviews, 100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight strong support from staff and lecturers, alongside a positive academic experience and conducive learning atmosphere.

Rating distribution
5★
19%
0%
0%
18%
0%
0%
50%
4★
74%
0%
100%
36%
0%
0%
50%
3★
4%
0%
0%
36%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
9%
0%
0%
0%
1★
4%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close