University of Ghana - UG vs Wisconsin International University College vs Islamic University of Ghana - IUG vs Accra Technical University vs Accra Institute of Technology

Side-by-side comparison from 278 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Pentecost University - PentVars (5.00)
University of Ghana - UG: wins 0/6 categories
Wisconsin International University College: wins 1/6 categories
Islamic University of Ghana - IUG: wins 0/6 categories
Accra Technical University: wins 0/6 categories
Accra Institute of Technology: wins 0/6 categories
Pentecost University - PentVars: wins 5/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Administration
Best programme: Accounting
Best programme: Building Technology
Best programme: Accounting
Category ratings
Facilities
4.00
3.50
Not rated
3.67
2.00
4.00
Location
4.32
4.50
Win
Not rated
3.82
Not rated
4.00
Professors
4.25
4.00
Not rated
4.36
4.00
5.00
Win
Internationality
4.08
3.83
Not rated
3.95
3.00
5.00
Win
Student life
4.29
4.17
Not rated
3.95
4.00
4.50
Win
Value
4.22
3.67
Not rated
4.41
2.00
5.00
Win
Accommodation
3.48
3.83
Not rated
3.24
1.00
4.00
Win
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Strong academic programs and theory-practice balance
  • +Diverse, inclusive, and intellectually engaging campus environment
  • +Opportunities for exploration and personal growth
  • +Knowledgeable and engaging lecturers
  • +Positive learning environment and campus facilities
  • +Strong academic programs and curriculum

Nothing to show

  • +Strong focus on practical learning and job market preparation
  • +Approachable and supportive lecturers
  • +Encourages leadership and professional growth
  • +Engaging and effective teaching methods
  • +Supportive and accessible instructors
  • +Excellent career development support
  • +Strong practical focus and industry relevance
  • +Supportive faculty and positive community environment
  • +Holistic development beyond academics
Cons
  • -Outdated curriculum and teaching methods hinder skill development.
  • -Inefficient administrative processes cause communication and access issues.
  • -Overcrowded facilities and old-fashioned learning environments are problematic.
  • -Administrative and management issues create confusion and inefficiency.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning and student comfort.
  • -Lack of clear communication and student support leads to frustration.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a common complaint.
  • -Students often express dissatisfaction with the quality of teaching and curriculum.
  • -Administrative and management issues are prevalent.
  • -Outdated facilities and limited technology are concerns.
  • -The class system is considered insufficient.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent complaint.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a common concern.
  • -Inconsistent communication and poor course structure lead to frustration.
Rating summary
What students say

Overall, the university receives positive feedback, with particularly strong ratings in Location (4.32), Student Life (4.29), and Value (4.22). Professors (4.25) and Internationality (4.08) also score well. The weakest area identified is Accomodation, receiving a rating of 3.48, indicating room for improvement in this aspect of the student experience. Facilities also received a solid, but lower, score of 4.

Consider this university's performance: It excels in its Location, receiving a high rating of 4.5. Student Life also stands out with a score of 4.17. The weakest area noted is Facilities, with a 3.5 rating. Other aspects like Professors, Accommodation, Internationality, and Value fall within a solid range, generally scoring above 3.5.

Nothing to show

A review of university ratings reveals a strong performance in value and professor quality, with scores of 4.41 and 4.36 respectively. Student life and internationality also received high marks, both at 3.95. The weakest area identified is accommodation, scoring 3.24, followed by facilities at 3.67. The location received a respectable 3.82 rating.

This institution excels in academics and social engagement, with particularly strong ratings for **Professors** and **Student Life**. Conversely, its weakest areas are **Location** and **Accomodation**, both receiving the lowest possible scores. Facilities and overall value are rated moderately. Internationality is a mid-range strength, indicating a solid but not outstanding global presence.

This institution garners excellent marks, particularly excelling in its professors and internationality, both receiving a perfect score. Student life also stands out with a 4.5 rating. Facilities, location, and accommodation are all rated a solid 4. Its value proposition is also exceptionally high, scoring a 5. Overall, the university presents a compelling and well-rounded offering.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Most reviews (~88%) highlight academic excellence, diverse programs, and vibrant campus life. A small minority (~1.6%) experienced administrative delays and outdated teaching methods.

Students highly praise knowledgeable lecturers and a good learning environment, with positive feedback comprising ~83% of reviews. Some notes suggest improvements needed in facilities and classroom availability.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4.36/5 from 22 reviews, approximately 91% highlight hands-on learning and supportive lecturers. A few mention limited practical facilities or a desire for more programs. No negative feedback was recorded.

The single review (100% negative) suggests administrative issues despite brilliant teachers and good courses. The student experienced a slightly poor administration system.

With a perfect 5/5 average rating from two reviews, the university garners overwhelmingly positive feedback (~100%). Students highlight strong practical skills, good faculty support, and positive campus environments. No negative feedback was reported.

Rating distribution
5★
41%
33%
0%
45%
0%
100%
4★
47%
50%
0%
45%
0%
0%
3★
11%
17%
0%
9%
0%
0%
2★
1%
0%
0%
0%
100%
0%
1★
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Educative

The University of Ghana is a highly respected institution with strong research, diverse programs, and a vibrant campus life, though it faces challenges with large class sizes and administrative delays, and I would recommend it for its academic reputation and opportunities.

The Ultimate Experience

Wisconsin International University College(WIUC), is one of the top leading private universities in Ghana. There are pros and cons to WIUC. In terms of the positive aspect of the school, the Lecturers are very knowledgeable and highly skilled in their fields. They lecture with understanding and engage students in precise activities that aid the students in learning. Next is the environment. The environment is clean, serene and in order. My favourite place in the school is the Library. As a student, the library is by far the best place to study. The library is clean, spacious, quiet and airconditioned. Every student has their own cubicle to study and avoid distractions. In terms of the negative aspects of the school, unless you are in your second year going, you aren't allowed to use laptops in class. As a technological person, this was a challenge for me. I study better when I type my notes however if I have to write down my notes, I usually miss the important points and get easily distracted. Another con is hangout spots. Besides the cafeteria and hallways, there aren't any spots to hang out with your mates in the school. Honestly, besides these, I can't think of any other cons.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close