EU Business School vs Technical University of Dortmund - TU Dortmund vs WHU - Otto Beisheim School of Management vs South Westphalia University of Applied Sciences vs International School of Management (ISM)
Side-by-side comparison from 269 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Supportive and approachable staff and faculty
- +Practical, interactive learning with strong career focus
- +Welcoming community and international environment
- +Supportive staff and international environment
- +Modern facilities and resources
- +Well-structured programs and helpful guidance
- +Excellent faculty and practical learning experiences
- +International exposure and real-world business cases
- +Engaging program with opportunities for skill development and creativity
- +Practical, hands-on curriculum and industry relevance
- +Supportive and approachable faculty
- +International environment and practical career preparation
- +High-quality lectures and academic planning
- +Diverse assessment methods
- +Opportunities for holistic student development
- +Strong international business programs
- +Positive semester abroad opportunities
- +Integrated business and technology education for practical application.
- +Small class sizes and personal lecturer/staff interaction.
- +Strong focus on entrepreneurship and innovation.
- -Administrative and management issues cause disorganization.
- -Educational quality is perceived as basic and lacking proper support.
- -Facilities and extracurriculars are underdeveloped and not prioritized.
- -Administrative & management issues disrupt operations and student support.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning and comfort.
- -Lack of clear communication and transparency causes confusion and frustration.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder the learning experience.
- -Poor communication and lack of support from staff are consistently criticized.
- -Students are dissatisfied with administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a recurring problem.
- -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant and poorly delivered.
- -Administrative and management issues are frequently cited as a source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources detract from the learning environment.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from faculty and staff is a recurring problem.
- -Administrative & management issues disrupt student experience.
- -Outdated facilities hinder learning and comfort.
- -Lack of clear communication and support causes frustration.
- -Administrative and management issues are a major source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are frequently criticized.
- -Poor communication and lack of support from staff are recurring complaints.
This institution demonstrates significant strengths in its **Location** and **Internationality**, both scoring an impressive 4.7. Student life is also highly regarded at 4.2. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents the weakest area, with a rating of 3.4. Other aspects like Facilities, Professors, and Value fall within a moderate to good range, generally above 3.8.
This institution garners exceptional marks for its Facilities, receiving a perfect 5. Areas of notable strength also include Internationality at 4.8 and Professors and Location, both rated 4.6. Conversely, Student Life and Accomodation are rated a respectable 4, representing the areas with the lowest scores in this assessment.
Overall, this university garners very positive feedback. Its strongest aspects include excellent Facilities, Professors, and Location, all scoring a high 4.5. Value is also rated highly at 4.5. Areas with slightly lower scores are Student Life and Internationality, both at 3.5. Accommodations received a solid 4.
Overall, this university garners excellent scores across most categories. Its strongest areas are internationality and value, both receiving perfect marks. Professors are also highly regarded. Facilities, location, and student life are rated very well. The weakest area is accommodation, which falls significantly below other metrics.
This institution performs exceptionally well in its teaching staff, earning a strong 4.5 for professors. Its facilities, location, internationality, and overall value also receive respectable scores of 3.5. Student life is rated moderately at 3. However, accommodation emerges as a significant weakness, with a low rating of 1.
This institution excels in several key areas, achieving perfect scores for location, student life, internationality, and value. Facilities are also highly rated, indicating a positive student experience. Conversely, the university's performance in professor quality and accommodation received moderate scores, suggesting these aspects could be areas for improvement.
This institution garners exceptional ratings in several key areas. Professors and accommodation stand out with perfect scores, indicating a highly valued academic staff and excellent housing options. Student life and facilities also received near-perfect marks, suggesting a vibrant campus environment and well-equipped resources. Conversely, internationality and value represent the weaker aspects, with ratings of 4.4, suggesting potential areas for enhancement in global engagement and affordability.
Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting career services, supportive staff, and an international environment. About 7.4% are negative, citing disorganization and basic education.
All 8 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.5/5. Students highlight rewarding academics, approachable professors, a supportive international environment, and well-equipped facilities.
The university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback (100% positive reviews) with an average rating of 4.5/5. Students highlight experienced professors, a strong mix of theory and practical application, and enjoyable staff and fellow students.
All 5 reviews were positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Students highlighted practical, hands-on education, approachable faculty, and good career preparation. No negative feedback was reported.
With a 3.5/5 average rating from two reviews, approximately 50% are positive. Students highlight strong academic planning, lectures, and assessments for enhancing learning. Minimal negative feedback was noted.
With one review, the average rating is 4 out of 5 stars. This overwhelmingly positive feedback suggests a good experience, with no negative comments recorded.
All 6 reviews are highly positive, with an average rating of 5/5 stars. Students highlight the strong focus on technology and entrepreneurship, practical learning, and a welcoming atmosphere. No negative feedback was reported.
As far as universities go I think EU business school comes first in terms of student-staff relationship. Every member of the staff I have encountered has been more than helpful. What i think should improve as even tho its not connected to my previous point is I think the school should have more leniency towards tuition payment specially to international students because we are here despite the challenges of having to find willing banks to exchange local currencies to Euros.
Nothing to show
Amazing program, it provides the perfect blend and opportunity to learn skills and also explore your creativity. Most professors are very experienced and well known within their field of expertise. Some are outstanding and provide you with great knowledge. There is a lot of emphases given to practical learning and group projects. WHU staff, as well as students, were good fun.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This was the best Varsity ever. The professionalism is on the high level. I have no dislikes and I highly recommend it to people who are struggling with focus. It's takes special students with disabilities.
