University of Wroclaw - UWr vs WSB University - WSB vs Cracow University of Technology - PK vs Silesian University of Technology - SUT vs University of Lodz - UL
Side-by-side comparison from 235 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Well-organized university with responsive administration
- +Inspiring learning environment with quality education and practical experience
- +Welcoming international community and enjoyable student life in a beautiful city
- +Practical, career-focused programmes with real-world skills
- +Supportive and approachable lecturers and staff
- +Flexible learning formats and opportunities for personal development
- +Practical, up-to-date courses and hands-on learning
- +Helpful, passionate professors and supportive staff
- +Opportunities for personal and academic growth
- +Hands-on learning opportunities and well-equipped facilities
- +Supportive and knowledgeable professors
- +Strong career preparation in specialized fields
- +High-quality education with excellent, approachable professors and a supportive atmosphere.
- +Diverse, international, and social environment with many opportunities.
- +Modern, well-equipped facilities and a positive urban setting.
- +Academic excellence and practical skills development
- +Supportive community and global perspective
- +Online study options and affordability
- +Supportive and helpful staff
- +Inspiring and dedicated lecturers
- +Motivating and safe learning environment
- -Outdated and irrelevant course content not suitable for English Philology graduates.
- -Lack of promised opportunities beyond specific career paths like translation or business.
- -Severely underfunded and inadequate facilities.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Course content is often irrelevant or poorly delivered.
- -Administrative and management issues frustrate students.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from faculty and staff is disappointing.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are frequently mentioned.
- -Poor teaching quality and ineffective instruction are common complaints.
- -Excessive administrative burdens and lack of efficient management.
- -Outdated or poorly maintained facilities and resources.
- -Unengaging curriculum and ineffective teaching methods.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor equipment detract from the learning experience.
- -Lack of depth in technical subjects fails to meet expectations for specialized knowledge.
- -Poor academic support and communication.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment.
- -Administrative and management issues.
Evaluations reveal a university with notable strengths in location, boasting a score of 4.81, and in its professors, earning a 4.47. Student life and value are also highly regarded. The weakest area identified is accommodation, with a rating of 3.99, suggesting room for improvement in this category. Facilities and internationality also received solid, above-average scores.
This university scores highly in several key areas, with location and internationality being particularly strong points. Student life and accommodation received the lowest ratings among the surveyed categories. Facilities and value for money are also well-regarded, while professors are rated favorably as well.
This institution receives strong acclaim for its internationality, scoring 4.35, and its value, rated at 4.29. Facilities and student life are also highly regarded, both at 4.25. Professors are well-rated at 4.06, while accommodation stands as the weakest area, with a score of 4. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded picture with particularly impressive international appeal.
With a strong showing in key areas, this university excels particularly in its **location**, receiving the highest rating. **Student life** and **professors** also score very well, indicating a positive overall experience. Conversely, **internationality** and **accommodation** present the weakest points, though still receiving respectable scores. The remaining categories, including **facilities** and **value**, fall within a solid middle range, reflecting a generally positive institutional assessment.
This institution garners strong ratings across several key areas. Location and value are particularly well-regarded, achieving scores over 4.2. Internationality and professors also score highly, exceeding 4.1. While student life and accommodation are rated positively, facilities represent the weakest area among the surveyed categories.
This university shows excellent marks in two key areas: Facilities and Internationality, both scoring a high 4.7. Its strengths lie in providing impressive resources and a globally diverse environment. Areas that received more moderate feedback, averaging 3.7, include Professors, Student Life, Accommodation, and Value. These aspects indicate room for improvement compared to its standout categories.
This institution garners excellent scores across multiple facets, particularly excelling in Facilities, Professors, Student Life, Accommodation, and Internationality, all receiving a strong 4.5. Location scores a respectable 4, while Value is the relatively weakest area at 4. Overall, it presents a highly positive student experience with notable strengths in its campus environment and support systems.
The university receives strong positive feedback (~86%) regarding inspiring people, good organization, and enjoyable student life. A small percentage of reviews (~3.9%) mention program course design issues and underfunded facilities.
With an average rating of 4/5 based on 11 reviews, ~73% of feedback is positive. Students highlight practical, student-friendly learning environments, approachable lecturers, and opportunities for personal development and internships. No negative feedback was reported.
Nearly all 100% of reviews are positive, with students highlighting practical and up-to-date courses, helpful professors, and opportunities for personal and academic growth. The average rating is 4.06/5.
Students highly praise the university, with ~84% giving positive reviews. Recurring themes include well-equipped labs, helpful professors, and excellent resources for hands-on learning and career development.
With a 4.13/5 average rating from 98 reviews, ~94% are positive, highlighting a high-quality education, supportive academic staff, and a social, dynamic city. No negative feedback was received.
With a 4/5 average rating, approximately 67% of reviews are positive, praising academic excellence, innovative thinking, and flexible online study options. A smaller portion, ~33%, indicates dissatisfaction, particularly regarding the dean's office efficiency and depth of technical program knowledge.
With a perfect 5/5 average rating, 100% of reviews are positive. Students highlight helpful staff and inspiring, supportive lecturers who create a motivating learning environment and aid personal and academic growth.
As a current master's student in the Communication Management program at the University of Wroclaw, I can confidently say that this journey has been one of the most enriching experiences of my life, not only academically, but also personally and professionally. 1. Global opportunities through Erasmus+: During my time here, I’ve joined two short-term BIP exchange programs in Spain and Romania (with a generous grant), and have a one-year exchange in Germany. These experiences have allowed me to meet peers from across Europe, learn in diverse settings, and grow both culturally and intellectually. 2. Serious research, strong support: I’m currently representing our Institute in a Monography research project of UWr, a valuable opportunity to engage deeply with academic work and collaborate with professors in a meaningful way. The opportunity is open for all students who wanna pursue an academic path. 3. Supportive and passionate faculty: The professors are not only knowledgeable but also truly approachable. In the first semester, I approached my professor for guidance on career path, research opportunities, and expressed my interest. She shared insightful experiences, motivated and encouraged me a lot. And she nominated me for the Monography research project under her supervision, and I got the opportunity. I'm grateful, honestly. 4. Practice-oriented learning: Unlike many programs that are heavy on theory, this one focuses on real-world projects, case studies, and group work - ideal for master's-level students who want to build practical skills for the workplace. Actually, I don't face much study pressure, I enjoy the courses. 5. International Office that really cares: The International Office team is incredibly helpful. During the application process, I was surprised that they always responded to my email inquiries quickly and helped me resolve any issues. When I study here, from paperworks support to academic/exchange activities, they are always ready to assist and create a welcoming environment for students from all over the world. 6. Peaceful lifestyle & affordable living: Wroclaw is a charming, student-friendly city with a mix of history and modernity. The cost of living is reasonable, making it accessible for many international students without compromising on quality of life. I travelled to many cities in European countries, but Wroclaw is one of the most peaceful and affordable cities. Although the English skills of the city officers are limited, they always try to support by using Google Translate or finding support people. Studying at the University of Wroclaw has opened doors I never imagined: from international networks to research, from personal growth to professional clarity. If you're looking for an educational experience that truly takes you beyond the classroom, this could be your next big step. I appreciate this experience and believe that this is a worthy step to open up many opportunities to explore the world!
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Studies, are at very good level, but the most important think is what university gives you apart from lectures. There are so many free courser, and student organisactions you can join. Ya'll never get bored here.
I was an international student at the University of Lodz in Poland. I am very happy that I choose this university for my masters studies. May be for some one its not but the overall discipline is appreciable.
The University of Economy in Bydgoszcz or Wyższa Szkoła Gospodarki as they call it in polish is a private university with a lot of international students. It is a great place for those who just want to take it easy and enjoy being student cos university gives that opportunity. You will find places to develop your personal and social skills if you will look for these opportunities. However, for those who seek deep knowledge in engineering or programming, I wouldn't recommend going to UoE in Bydgoszcz. Professors very often don't really care about students and are not engaging in your studying process unless you will make them (and yes I mean it). I can judge only engineering courses and professors as a mechatronics student, however, I doubt other courses are any better, I think it is generally the university's approach to education. So to sum up, I would recommend or don't recommend this uni depending on how you will answer the question in the title, if you want to study and earn a profound knowledge in the area then probably you should look for some other place if however, you want 3-4 careless years, then UoE is a perfect place for your post-school studying.
Nothing to show
