EADA Business School vs EU Business School vs OBS Business School vs Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona - UAB vs INESDI Digital Business School - Barcelona
Side-by-side comparison from 521 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Strong professors with practical experience and supportive environment
- +International atmosphere and networking opportunities
- +Dynamic, practical learning with skill development
- +Industry expert professors and practical, real-world application focus
- +Strong emphasis on out-of-class learning and hands-on experience
- +Vibrant campus life and diverse international student community
- +Strong business programs with real-world application
- +Engaging professors and challenging coursework
- +Networking opportunities and appealing study location
- +Excellent faculty expertise and professor support
- +Accessible digital resources and student services
- +Pleasant campus environment and connectivity
- +Knowledgeable and experienced professors with industry practice
- +Practical and hands-on learning approach
- +Personalized student attention and career development support
- +Expert and supportive instructors
- +Practical, hands-on learning experiences like workshops and shootings
- +Modern facilities and extensive industry-relevant resources
- +Flexible courses & supportive teachers
- +Career advancement & internship opportunities
- +Personal and professional growth
- -Administrative and communication issues, including last-minute scheduling and inflexible processes.
- -Disappointment with program content not meeting advertised expectations, such as the lack of sustainability focus.
- -Inconsistent or arbitrary grading practices were a concern.
- -Disorganized administration and unhelpful staff lead to constant confusion.
- -Poor educational quality, including basic courses and insufficient study facilities.
- -Lack of accreditation and business-like focus detract from educational value.
- -Lack of qualified teachers and poor educational quality
- -Perceived as a for-profit institution rather than a school
- -Ineffective learning environment and useless forum structure
- -Poor teaching quality and negative teacher interactions.
- -Substandard housing conditions and inadequate facilities.
- -Lack of academic support and administrative issues.
- -administrative & management issues
- -poor communication and transparency
- -difficulties with financial processes
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and lack of support from staff are common frustrations.
- -Outdated course content and lack of practical training.
- -Poor communication and a feeling of being scammed.
- -Administrative and management issues.
This institution garners excellent reviews, particularly excelling in **Location** with a score of 4.92. **Facilities** and **Internationality** also stand out with strong ratings of 4.60 and 4.77 respectively. The **Accomodation** category received the lowest score at 4.24, while other areas like **Professors**, **Student Life**, and **Value** received consistently high marks, all above 4.49.
With a robust score of 4.69, **Location** stands out as the university's strongest asset, closely followed by its high **Internationality** rating of 4.68. Conversely, **Accomodation** emerges as the lowest-rated category at 3.44. Other areas like Facilities (4.03), Student Life (4.14), Professors (3.97), and Value (3.86) fall within a moderate to good range, indicating a generally positive but uneven performance across different aspects.
This institution presents a largely consistent performance across several key areas. Facilities, professors, location, accommodation, and internationality all received a solid 2.5 rating, indicating a generally positive experience. The strongest aspect appears to be value, scoring a 3. Conversely, student life is the weakest area, rated at 2, suggesting room for improvement in that regard.
Across various metrics, the university demonstrates a strong showing, particularly in Student Life (4.23) and Value (4.00). Internationality also scores well at 3.98. The weakest area is Accomodation, with a rating of 3.67, though Facilities (3.90), Professors (3.83), and Location (3.83) also received solid, above-average scores.
Examining the provided ratings reveals a mixed picture. This institution excels in areas such as **professors**, achieving a strong 4 out of 5. It also demonstrates good standing in **internationality** and **value**, both scoring 3. Conversely, significant weaknesses are apparent with zero ratings for **facilities**, **location**, and **accommodation**. **Student life** received a low score of 1.
Outstanding marks are awarded for the university's **Location**, which received a perfect score. Areas of particular strength also include **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Student Life**, all scoring above 4.3. **Value** is another highly rated aspect, coming in at 4.67. The university's **Accomodation** and **Internationality** received solid ratings of 4.0, representing its relatively weaker, though still good, performance.
A review of this university reveals a mixed but generally positive assessment. Its strongest areas are Student Life and Internationality, both scoring around 3.67. Facilities, Location, and Accommodation received a solid 3, while Professors and Value landed slightly higher at approximately 3.33.
Over 96 reviews, ~97% are positive, praising practical, globally recognized programs, excellent professors, and a strong international community. A small portion (~3%) mentioned issues with administrative inflexibility and insufficient focus on specific program elements.
Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting industry expert professors, practical applications, and vibrant campus life. A smaller ~8% of feedback points to disorganization and basic course content.
Most reviews are positive, highlighting good educational foundations and opportunities. However, about 33.3% of feedback is negative, citing issues with teaching quality and program recognition.
~81% of reviews are positive, highlighting strong academic support, useful resources, and a pleasant campus environment. A small percentage (~4.6%) expresses dissatisfaction with teaching quality and faculty interaction.
Reviews are predominantly positive (~75%), with students highlighting knowledgeable professors and a practical, in-depth curriculum. A smaller portion (~25%) reported issues with administrative processes.
With an average rating of 4.33/5, approximately 67% of reviews are highly positive, praising professional teachers, workshops, and modern facilities. No negative feedback was recorded.
With an average rating of 3.67/5 from 3 reviews, approximately 67% of feedback is positive, highlighting career advancement, internships, and effective teaching. About 33% of feedback expressed disappointment with communication and outdated course content.
My time at EADA is something I'll look back on with a big smile. The classes were well paced and the professors were great, not just as teachers but as people. They'd share their own real world experiences which made everything feel much more grounded and useful. Campus life was a lot of fun. Between the events, the outdoor activities and the people you meet across programs, you find your people pretty quickly. EADA has this big family energy that's hard to describe but very easy to feel. And it doesn't stop when you graduate either. The alumni network is genuinely one of the best parts, people actually stay connected and look out for each other. I'd recommend it without hesitation.
I love to take a path in a good environment to perform my ability to intend all the perspective that matches and are suitable for every student in daily lifestyle and work in a way which will be helpful for the needs or students to get higher oppurtuinitied
It's embarrassing that they call themselves a school. They're a company that wants to take your money without providing any education nor a recognized degree. The "teachers" are businessmen without any teaching qualification and without the know-how, the classes were boring and the forum structure is pointless. Save yourself and study somewhere else!
I studied tourism at UAB for one semester in 2022. I was supposed to stay for a full year, but my experience wasn't good and I left after the first semester. First of all, the housing area (Villa universitária) has mold. I was sick constantly during my exhange and went through multiple respiratory infections. I also had almost daily headaches and a very painful and strong cough. All of this eased after a couple weeks once I returned to my home country. Other exhange students told me about having the same issues and some noticed mold in their apartment walls. The housing area at times is very unsave and not controlled properly. The tourism faculty is located in the same building with the housing area reception. Therefore, it was very excluded from the rest of the campus. That's why, I didn't really get to use any of the services offered at the campus or get a real university experience. UAB also has a medical centre for "all students" according to their website, yet this doesn't include tourism students. I was turned away from the centre despite being extremely sick once they heard I study tourism at the school. The classes focused more on remembering as much information as you can to pass the exam, rather than focusing on understanding, critical thinking etc. The teachers were very often late to classes, they felt very unmotivated and I received very little feedback. In short, I do not recommend UAB. My experience was a loss of money and time.
My experience with Inesdi, a business school in Barcelona, was deeply discouraging. After requesting a refund of 200 euros for an unused service, I found myself trapped in a cycle of procrastination and evasion by the admissions manager. What should have been a simple process turned into an ordeal lasting almost three months, with no guarantee of receiving my money back. The lack of transparency and professionalism on the part of Inesdi is worrying. Instead of addressing my request promptly, they seemed more interested in prolonging the process, apparently to avoid fulfilling their obligation to refund the money. After weeks of frustration and multiple contact attempts, I was abruptly informed that my application was no longer eligible, with no clear explanation. In short, my experience with Inesdi was a total disappointment. Your lack of integrity and respect for clients demonstrates a lack of commitment to basic ethical standards. I recommend those considering enrolling at Inesdi to think twice, as it seems that their priority is not providing quality education or satisfactory customer service, but simply money.
The professional teachers, the shootings and workshops! The university is really beautiful and modern. We received a lot of information about fashion and stylists, magazines and the library it was really cool!
I genuinely wish I could leave a positive review about Hospitality Academy, but unfortunately, my experience has been incredibly disappointing and feels like a scam. They promised a hospitality certificate program with proper classes and training. I attended the first class, and after that—nothing. No follow-up, no new classes, and the content they provided was completely outdated, with videos from as far back as 2008. What’s worse is the complete lack of communication. I’ve reached out more than ten times via email and received no response. I also contacted my supposed advisor multiple times, and again—nothing. This level of unprofessionalism is unacceptable, especially from a company claiming to help professionals grow in the hospitality industry. I do not recommend this program to anyone. If you're serious about your education, go directly with accredited universities. It will save you time, money, and a lot of frustration.
