Brunel University London vs Kingston University - KU vs Birkbeck University of London vs St George's University of London vs Online Business School

Side-by-side comparison from 240 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Brunel University London: wins 0/7 categories
Kingston University - KU: wins 0/7 categories
Birkbeck University of London: wins 5/7 categories
St George's University of London: wins 2/7 categories
Online Business School: wins 0/7 categories
Jolt.io: wins 0/7 categories
Royal College of Art - RCA: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
London, The United Kingdom
4.10
Read more reviews
119 reviews
×
Best programme: Computer Science
London, The United Kingdom
4.20
Read more reviews
79 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Management and Marketing
London, The United Kingdom
4.30
Read more reviews
35 reviews
×
Best programme: BSc Psychology
London, The United Kingdom
4.30
Read more reviews
7 reviews
×
Best programme: Biomedical Science
London, The United Kingdom
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
London, The United Kingdom
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
London, The United Kingdom
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
3.98
4.15
4.18
Win
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Location
3.72
4.07
4.59
Win
3.57
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
4.03
4.10
4.50
Win
4.29
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
4.33
4.30
4.44
Win
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
3.83
3.91
3.76
4.14
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Value
4.13
4.07
4.09
4.29
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
3.61
3.62
4.19
Win
3.33
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Practical, career-focused learning with industry relevance
  • +Supportive and engaging teaching staff
  • +Accessible campus and useful resources
  • +Knowledgeable and approachable lecturers, practical and relevant course content
  • +Inclusive campus environment with many opportunities for personal and professional growth
  • +Strong support systems and useful resources for students
  • +Supportive and caring staff communication
  • +Engaging and knowledgeable lecturers
  • +Diverse and motivated student community
  • +Strong healthcare focus and practical NHS experience
  • +Excellent faculty support and expertise
  • +Unique communication skills training and supportive community

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant concern.
  • -Outdated course content and confusing teaching methods are frustrating.
  • -Poor communication and lack of professionalism are prevalent.
  • -Administrative and management issues are prevalent.
  • -Lack of resources and support negatively impacts studies.
  • -Disorganized student union and indifferent faculty are recurring problems.
  • -Unresponsive and unhelpful administrative staff.
  • -Overcrowded and poorly maintained facilities.
  • -Lack of adequate resources and support for students.
  • -Administrative & management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Facilities are often outdated and in poor condition.
  • -Lack of communication and unclear policies cause frustration.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution garners a strong overall rating, particularly excelling in **Internationality** with a score of 4.33. **Professors** and **Value** also receive high marks. Conversely, **Accomodation** and **Location** present the weakest areas, scoring 3.61 and 3.72 respectively. Facilities, student life, and professors all fall within a commendable 3.8 to 4.0 range.

Overall, the university garners positive feedback, with Internationality standing out as its strongest area. Facilities, Professors, Location, and Value also received favorable scores. Student Life and Accomodation are areas where improvements could be beneficial, as they received the lowest ratings in the survey.

Academic and faculty excellence stand out, with professors receiving a near-perfect score. Location also scores highly, reflecting a desirable setting. However, student life and value represent the areas with the most room for improvement. Facilities and internationality are rated favorably, contributing to a generally positive assessment.

Overall, the university receives positive feedback. Its strongest areas include professors and value, both scoring very high. Student life and internationality also received strong marks. The weakest area appears to be accommodation, which garnered the lowest score. Facilities and location fall in the mid-range, indicating room for improvement in these aspects.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

Over 97% of reviews are positive, highlighting career-focused degrees, practical learning, and supportive lecturers. A small amount of negative feedback mentions visa issues and course content clarity.

Kingston University receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~81% of 80 reviews being 4-5 stars and an average rating of 4.19/5. Key strengths include knowledgeable lecturers, practical course content, and a supportive environment, though a small percentage (~2.5%) noted poor management and lack of resources.

With a 4.26/5 average rating from 35 reviews, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight strong communication, caring and approachable staff, and knowledgeable, engaging lecturers. Small class sizes foster personalized attention.

With an average rating of 4.29/5, ~100% of reviews are positive. Students praise healthcare courses, practical experience, faculty support, and the university's location. Some minor concerns include slow administration.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
32%
41%
43%
57%
0%
0%
0%
4★
55%
42%
40%
14%
0%
0%
0%
3★
10%
16%
17%
29%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
3%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
3%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Human Geography

The course and it's syllabus can be super interesting and fun but most of the lecturers are trash. They show no enthusiasm to teach and deliver lectures as if they were eulogies. Which is a shame, I feel the only thing holding back KU is the lack of enthusiasm.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close